NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory contract with Caltech totals $18.6M for R&D support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,624,031 ($18.6M)

Contractor: California Institute of Technology

Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Start Date: 2012-10-01

End Date: 2018-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,190 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF GROUND SYSTEMS AND SERVICES SUPPORT FOR GSFC VIA HEADQUARTERS (AMMOS TOOLS AND SERVICES) THE CONTRACT IS THE SPONSORING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) AND THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (CONTRACTOR), A PRIVATE NONPROFIT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, WHICH ESTABLISHES THE RELATIONSHIP FOR THE OPERATION OF THE FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER (FFRDC) KNOWN AS THE JET PROPULSION LABORATORY. THE CONTRACTOR, JPL, IS REQUIRED TO PERFORM WORK THAT IS DESIGNATED IN TASK ORDERS ISSUED BY THE NASA MANAGEMENT OFFICE (NMO) CONTRACTING OFFICERS. NASA SPONSORED WORK: JPL S PRIMARY MISSION IS TO SUPPORT THE NASA SCIENCE MISSION DIRECTORATE (SMD) IN CARRYING OUT THE SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES IDENTIFIED IN THE SMD SCIENCE PLAN. THE FOUR BROAD SCIENTIFIC AREAS ARE: EARTH SCIENCE, PLANETARY SCIENCE, HELIOPHYSICS, AND ASTROPHYSICS. IN PERFORMANCE OF THIS CONTRACT, JPL SHALL: 1) SUPPLY A BROAD BASE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES RELEVANT TO NASA PROGRAM AND PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS. 2) FOSTER ITS UNIQUE RELATIONSHIP WITH A TOP-TIER UNIVERSITY TO FACILITATE THE INVOLVEMENT OF SCIENTISTS, ENGINEERS, AND STUDENTS FROM THE UNIVERSITY AND RESEARCH COMMUNITIES IN NASA MISSION AND IN SUPPORTING OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. 3) SUPPORT NASA IN ENABLING PROGRAM AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPABILITIES. 4) DEVELOP SPACECRAFT AND INSTRUMENTS THAT ARE SENT TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS WITH OUR SOLAR SYSTEM, INCLUDING EARTH ORBIT, PLANETS, PLANETARY SATELLITES, ASTEROIDS, AND COMETS. THESE MISSIONS MAY BE ORBITERS, LANDERS, OR ROVERS, AND TYPICALLY INCLUDE CUTTING-EDGE TECHNOLOGIES REQUIRED TO MEET SCIENTIFIC REQUIREMENTS. 5) PERFORM PROJECT TASKS INVOLVING: (I) AUTONOMOUS DEEP-SPACE, INNER-SPACE AND EARTH-ORBITING SPACECRAFT OR MAJOR SUBSYSTEMS, (II) EXPERIMENTS, INSTRUMENTS, OR OTHER DEVICES WHICH MAY BE CARRIED AS PAYLOAD ON SPACECRAFTS IN MISSIONS MANAGED BY OTHERS, AND/OR (III) GROUND-BASED SYSTEMS. 6) BEYOND ITS PRIMARY MISSION, JPL MAY PERFORM WORK FOR OTHER NASA MISSION DIRECTORATES OR OFFICES. 7) JPL IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPERATION, RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGY INSERTION, AND MANAGEMENT OF NASA S DEEP SPACE NETWORK TO PROVIDE TELECOMMUNICATION AND OPERATION SERVICES, INCLUDING DATA ACQUISITION AND DATA DELIVERY REQUIRED TO MEET ESTABLISHED AGENCY OBJECTIVES. 8) JPL IS ALSO REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN AND CONDUCT AN EDUCATION PROGRAM IN CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE NASA HEADQUARTERS EDUCATION OFFICE, THE ACADEMIC COMMUNITY AT LARGE, AND IN SUPPORT TO NASA STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES TO IMPROVE STUDENT RETENTION IN THE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) DISCIPLINES. WORK FOR NON-NASA SPONSORS: JPL MAY PERFORM WORK FOR NON-NASA SPONSORS. THIS WORK WILL BE DESIGNATED IN TASK ORDERS ISSUED BY NMO CONTRACTING OFFICERS BASED ON TASK PLANS INITIATED BY THE CONTRACTOR.

Place of Performance

Location: PASADENA, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 91109

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $18.6 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF GROUND SYSTEMS AND SERVICES SUPPORT FOR GSFC VIA HEADQUARTERS (AMMOS TOOLS AND SERVICES) THE CONTRACT IS THE SPONSORING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) AND THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (CONTRACTOR), A PRIVATE NONPR… Key points: 1. Contract supports NASA's Science Mission Directorate objectives. 2. FFRDC model leverages specialized research capabilities. 3. Sole-source award raises questions about competition and cost-effectiveness. 4. Long-term contract (2012-2018) with significant value.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract is a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) type, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. Benchmarking is difficult without specific task order details and comparable FFRDC contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract is sole-source, awarded to the California Institute of Technology for operating the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC). This limits price discovery and competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are directed to a specific FFRDC for specialized research, potentially limiting broader economic benefits from competitive bidding.

Public Impact

Supports critical NASA scientific research and exploration missions. Ensures continued operation of the renowned Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Funds advanced research and development in physical, engineering, and life sciences. Impacts the scientific community through research outputs and data.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition.
  • CPFF contract type can increase cost risk.
  • Lack of detailed task order information hinders full analysis.

Positive Signals

  • Supports critical national science objectives.
  • Leverages unique FFRDC capabilities.
  • Long-term relationship fosters stability in research.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. FFRDCs like JPL are crucial for long-term, complex research projects that may not be suitable for traditional competitive contracting.

Small Business Impact

The contract is awarded to a large educational institution (Caltech) for FFRDC operations. There is no indication of small business participation in this specific contract award.

Oversight & Accountability

As an FFRDC, JPL operates under a specific agreement with NASA, implying a degree of oversight. However, the sole-source nature requires robust monitoring of performance and costs to ensure accountability.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Limited transparency on task order specifics
  • FFRDC reliance may limit broader industry innovation

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ca, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $18.6 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. IGF::CL::IGF GROUND SYSTEMS AND SERVICES SUPPORT FOR GSFC VIA HEADQUARTERS (AMMOS TOOLS AND SERVICES) THE CONTRACT IS THE SPONSORING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) AND THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (CONTRACTOR), A PRIVATE NONPROFIT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, WHICH ESTABLISHES THE RELATIONSHIP FOR THE OPERATION OF THE FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER (FFRDC) KNOWN AS THE JET PROPULSION LABORATORY. THE CONTRACTOR, JPL, IS REQUIRED

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-10-01. End: 2018-09-30.

What is the cost-effectiveness of using a sole-source FFRDC for these research objectives compared to competitive bidding for similar R&D?

Sole-source FFRDCs are justified by unique capabilities and long-term strategic needs. While competitive bidding can drive down costs, it may not always yield the specialized expertise or continuity required for complex, mission-critical research like that undertaken by JPL. The cost-effectiveness hinges on whether the unique value provided by JPL outweighs the potential savings from competition.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract for advanced research?

The primary risks of a CPFF contract in advanced research include potential cost overruns if the scope is not well-defined or if unforeseen technical challenges arise. The contractor has less incentive to control costs compared to fixed-price contracts. Effective oversight is crucial to manage scope creep and ensure efficient use of funds.

How effectively does this contract enable NASA's Science Mission Directorate to achieve its objectives?

The contract's effectiveness is tied to JPL's ability to deliver on task orders issued by NASA. Given JPL's established role and expertise in space exploration and science, it is likely effective in supporting SMD's objectives. However, measuring this effectiveness requires evaluating the successful completion of research projects and scientific discoveries enabled by the contract.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTSpace R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4800 OAK GROVE DR, PASADENA, CA, 91109

Business Categories: Category Business, Federally Funded Research and Development Corp, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $38,014,470

Exercised Options: $38,014,470

Current Obligation: $18,624,031

Actual Outlays: $45,929

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NNN12AA01C

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-10-01

Current End Date: 2018-09-30

Potential End Date: 2018-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-04-28

More Contracts from California Institute of Technology

View all California Institute of Technology federal contracts →

Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts

View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending