NASA's $183M Facilities Support Contract Awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. for LARC Operations
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $183,102,320 ($183.1M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2014-02-01
End Date: 2026-07-31
Contract Duration: 4,563 days
Daily Burn Rate: $40.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MODULE (CMM) SYSTEM FOR FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL TASK ORDER WITH A STATEMENT OF WORK AND OTHER TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED FOR FUNDING OBLIGATIONS ONLY AND TO ACCOUNT FOR CMM AND SAP FINANCIAL SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY. THIS "TASK ORDER" IS TO FUND NNL13AA14C CLIN 402 (FFP IDIQ). CENTER MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS, AND ENGINEERING (CMOE) CONTRACT. REQUIREMENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS, AND ENGINEERING OF LARC'S INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES AND HIGHLY TECHNICAL RESEARCH FACILITIES FOR MISSION SUCCESS. THE CMOE CONTRACT WILL PROVIDE CORE SUPPORT SERVICES TO LARC IN THE AREAS OF INSTITUTIONAL AND RESEARCH OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND ENGINEERING (OME). THESE TECHNICAL SERVICES INCLUDE: RESEARCH FACILITIES OPERATIONS (E.G., HIGHLY SPECIALIZED WIND TUNNELS, LABORATORIES, TEST STANDS, INSTRUMENTATION CALIBRATION/REPAIR); CENTRAL UTILITIES OPERATIONS (E.G., STEAM, COMPRESSED AIR, ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION, POTABLE WATER); TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT/ADMINISTRATION (E.G., FACILITY AUTOMATION SYSTEMS [FAS], DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEMS [DAS]); RESEARCH AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITY MAINTENANCE (E.G., PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE, TROUBLE CALLS, RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE [RCM], FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT [FCA]); AND FACILITY ENGINEERING (E.G., DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT, TACTICAL ENGINEERING, PRESSURE SYSTEM RECERTIFICATION, PROJECT MANAGEMENT/PLANNING SUPPORT).
Place of Performance
Location: HAMPTON, HAMPTON CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23681
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $183.1 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MODULE (CMM) SYSTEM FOR FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL TASK ORDER WITH A STATEMENT OF WORK AND OTHER TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED FOR FUNDING OBLIGATIONS ONLY AN… Key points: 1. Contract provides essential maintenance, operations, and engineering services for NASA's Langley Research Center (LaRC) facilities. 2. Amentum Technology, Inc. secured this contract through full and open competition. 3. The contract duration extends over 12 years, indicating a long-term need for these services. 4. Services encompass both institutional and highly technical research facilities, crucial for mission success. 5. The contract's value suggests a significant investment in maintaining critical research infrastructure. 6. This award represents a substantial commitment to supporting NASA's research and development capabilities.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $183.1 million over approximately 12 years for comprehensive facilities support services at NASA's Langley Research Center appears reasonable given the scope. While direct comparisons are difficult without detailed statements of work for similar facilities, the price per year averages around $15.2 million. This figure should be benchmarked against similar large-scale research facility maintenance contracts across federal agencies to fully assess value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple capable vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters competitive pricing and encourages a wide range of solutions. The government likely benefited from a robust bidding process that aimed to identify the best value provider for these critical support services.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors, ensuring that government funds are used efficiently.
Public Impact
NASA's Langley Research Center (LaRC) benefits from the continuous operation and maintenance of its research facilities. Scientists and researchers at LaRC will have reliable access to well-maintained institutional and technical facilities, supporting ongoing and future missions. The contract ensures the operational readiness of critical infrastructure, enabling advanced research and development. The workforce at LaRC will be supported by a stable environment for their scientific endeavors. Geographic impact is concentrated at the Langley Research Center in Virginia, supporting a key federal research hub.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen maintenance issues arise in highly technical research facilities.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical infrastructure operations could pose a risk if performance falters.
- Ensuring consistent quality of maintenance across diverse facility types requires robust oversight.
Positive Signals
- Long-term contract duration provides stability and continuity of essential services.
- Firm-fixed-price contract type offers predictable costs for the government.
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive and potentially cost-effective selection process.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a critical component of government operations that ensures the functionality and upkeep of federal buildings and infrastructure. The market for these services is substantial, with agencies like NASA requiring specialized expertise for complex research and development environments. Benchmarking this contract's value against similar large-scale facility management contracts for research institutions would provide further context on its market positioning.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside. However, the prime contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill specific aspects of the contract, which would be detailed in their subcontracting plan.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is likely managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers at the Langley Research Center. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's statement of work and performance standards. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific oversight details are not provided in the data.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Research and Development Contracts
- Federal Facilities Maintenance and Operations
- Aerospace Research Support Services
- Government Research Center Operations
Risk Flags
- Long-term contract duration may increase risk of contractor complacency or performance degradation over time.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure operations poses a potential single point of failure.
- Complexity of 'highly technical research facilities' may lead to unforeseen maintenance challenges and costs.
Tags
facilities-support, maintenance-operations-engineering, nasa, langley-research-center, amentum-technology-inc, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, virginia, research-and-development, aerospace, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $183.1 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. IGF::CT::IGF THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MODULE (CMM) SYSTEM FOR FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL TASK ORDER WITH A STATEMENT OF WORK AND OTHER TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED FOR FUNDING OBLIGATIONS ONLY AND TO ACCOUNT FOR CMM AND SAP FINANCIAL SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY. THIS "TASK ORDER" IS TO FUND NNL13AA14C CLIN 402 (FFP IDIQ). CENTER MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS, AND ENGINEERING (CMOE) CONTRACT. REQUIREMENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $183.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2014-02-01. End: 2026-07-31.
What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with NASA and similar federal agencies for facilities support services?
Amentum Technology, Inc. has a significant history of performing large-scale federal contracts, including extensive work with NASA and the Department of Defense. Their experience often spans complex facility operations, maintenance, and engineering services. While specific performance metrics for this particular contract are not yet available due to its recent award, Amentum's broader portfolio suggests a capacity to handle such requirements. A review of past performance evaluations and any past performance issues on similar contracts would provide a more detailed understanding of their reliability and effectiveness in delivering these critical services to government clients.
How does the $183.1 million contract value compare to similar facilities support contracts at other NASA centers or comparable research facilities?
The $183.1 million total contract value over approximately 12 years, averaging around $15.2 million annually, places this contract within the range of significant, long-term facility support agreements for major federal research installations. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to analyze the scope of work, facility size, and complexity of other contracts. For instance, contracts for maintaining large-scale laboratories or testing facilities at other NASA centers (like JPL or Ames) or at agencies such as the Department of Energy or the National Science Foundation could serve as benchmarks. Without specific comparable data, it's challenging to definitively state if this represents exceptional value, but the amount reflects the substantial operational needs of a major research center like LaRC.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are likely in place?
Key risks include potential cost overruns due to unforeseen maintenance needs in highly technical research facilities, contractor performance issues impacting critical operations, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities within the managed systems. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract oversight by NASA, clearly defined performance standards and penalties, regular performance reviews, and potentially contingency funding for unexpected issues. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government, shifting some of that burden to the contractor, provided the scope is well-defined.
How effective is the 'Facilities Support Services' category (NAICS 561210) in capturing the full scope of work for this contract?
The NAICS code 561210, 'Facilities Support Services,' is a broad category that generally encompasses the management and operation of facilities. For this contract, which includes maintenance, operations, and engineering for both institutional and highly technical research facilities, this code is a reasonable fit. However, the 'highly technical research facilities' aspect suggests that specialized engineering and maintenance expertise beyond standard building upkeep may be required. While the code captures the core function, a more granular understanding of the specific technical requirements would be needed to assess if it fully encompasses all specialized aspects of the work performed under this contract.
What are the historical spending patterns for facilities support at NASA's Langley Research Center?
Historical spending data for facilities support at NASA's Langley Research Center (LaRC) prior to this contract award would provide valuable context. Analyzing previous contracts for similar services, their values, durations, and awarded contractors would reveal trends in NASA's investment in maintaining its research infrastructure. Understanding if spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing over time can indicate shifts in facility needs, maintenance strategies, or budget allocations. Without this historical data, it's difficult to assess if the current $183.1 million award represents a significant change or continuation of past investment levels.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: NNL13458016R
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC
Address: 600 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD, TULLAHOMA, TN, 37388
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $203,215,159
Exercised Options: $203,215,159
Current Obligation: $183,102,320
Actual Outlays: $89,493,238
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 339
Total Subaward Amount: $107,487,143
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNL13AA14C
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2014-02-01
Current End Date: 2026-07-31
Potential End Date: 2026-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →