NASA's $38.5M Facilities Support Contract for Langley Research Center awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $38,473,500 ($38.5M)

Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Start Date: 2014-02-01

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 4,563 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MODULE (CMM) SYSTEM FOR FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL TASK ORDER WITH A STATEMENT OF WORK AND OTHER TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED FOR FUNDING OBLIGATIONS ONLY AND TO ACCOUNT FOR CMM AND SAP FINANCIAL SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY. THIS "TASK ORDER" IS TO FUND NNL13AA14C CLIN 3 (ENGINEERING). CENTER MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS, AND ENGINEERING (CMOE) CONTRACT. REQUIREMENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS, AND ENGINEERING OF LARC'S INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES AND HIGHLY TECHNICAL RESEARCH FACILITIES FOR MISSION SUCCESS. THE CMOE CONTRACT WILL PROVIDE CORE SUPPORT SERVICES TO LARC IN THE AREAS OF INSTITUTIONAL AND RESEARCH OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND ENGINEERING (OME). THESE TECHNICAL SERVICES INCLUDE: RESEARCH FACILITIES OPERATIONS (E.G., HIGHLY SPECIALIZED WIND TUNNELS, LABORATORIES, TEST STANDS, INSTRUMENTATION CALIBRATION/REPAIR); CENTRAL UTILITIES OPERATIONS (E.G., STEAM, COMPRESSED AIR, ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION, POTABLE WATER); TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT/ADMINISTRATION (E.G., FACILITY AUTOMATION SYSTEMS [FAS], DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEMS [DAS]); RESEARCH AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITY MAINTENANCE (E.G., PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE, TROUBLE CALLS, RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE [RCM], FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT [FCA]); AND FACILITY ENGINEERING (E.G., DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT, TACTICAL ENGINEERING, PRESSURE SYSTEM RECERTIFICATION, PROJECT MANAGEMENT/PLANNING SUPPORT).

Place of Performance

Location: HAMPTON, HAMPTON CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23681

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $38.5 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MODULE (CMM) SYSTEM FOR FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL TASK ORDER WITH A STATEMENT OF WORK AND OTHER TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED FOR FUNDING OBLIGATIONS ONLY AN… Key points: 1. Contract provides essential maintenance, operations, and engineering services for critical research facilities. 2. Amentum Technology, Inc. is the sole awardee for this specific delivery order. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, indicating performance incentives. 4. Services are crucial for NASA's mission success at the Langley Research Center. 5. The contract duration extends over a significant period, suggesting long-term support needs. 6. This award falls under facilities support services, a common government contracting category.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's Cost Plus Award Fee structure allows for performance-based incentives, which can drive value if managed effectively. Benchmarking this specific delivery order's pricing is challenging without detailed cost breakdowns and comparison to similar facilities support contracts at other NASA centers or federal agencies. However, the total value of $38.5 million over its period of performance suggests a substantial investment in maintaining critical research infrastructure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This delivery order was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. While the specific number of bidders for this particular order is not detailed, the 'full and open' designation implies that multiple qualified contractors had the opportunity to compete. This competitive environment is generally expected to lead to more favorable pricing and better service offerings for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it fosters a competitive marketplace, driving down costs and encouraging innovation among contractors, ultimately leading to better use of public funds.

Public Impact

Benefits NASA's Langley Research Center by ensuring the operational readiness of its facilities. Delivers essential maintenance, operations, and engineering services for highly technical research infrastructure. Supports ongoing scientific research and development activities conducted at LARC. Impacts the workforce at LARC by providing a stable environment for researchers and support staff. Ensures the continuity of critical government functions related to aerospace research.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

• Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Award Fee contracts if performance incentives are not tightly managed.
• Reliance on a single contractor for critical facilities support could pose a risk if performance degrades or unforeseen issues arise.
• The long duration of the contract may require ongoing vigilance to ensure continued value and alignment with evolving NASA needs.

Positive Signals

• Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive process likely secured favorable terms.
• The Cost Plus Award Fee structure incentivizes contractor performance, potentially leading to higher quality services.
• The contract supports critical national research infrastructure, aligning with government priorities.
• Amentum Technology, Inc. is an established entity in government contracting, suggesting a degree of reliability.

Sector Analysis

The Facilities Support Services sector is a significant segment of the federal contracting market, encompassing a wide range of services from janitorial to complex engineering and maintenance. This contract fits within the broader category of support services for government research and development facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar large-scale research facility operations and maintenance contracts can vary widely based on the complexity of the facilities and the scope of services required.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside for this delivery order. While this particular award may not have direct small business set-aside provisions, the prime contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business subcontracting and its impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are built into the Cost Plus Award Fee structure, which ties a portion of the contractor's fee to performance. Transparency is generally maintained through contract reporting mechanisms, though specific details of performance evaluations and fee determinations are typically internal to the agency.

Related Government Programs

• NASA Operations and Maintenance Contracts
• Federal Facilities Support Services
• Research and Development Infrastructure Support
• Cost Plus Award Fee Contracts

Risk Flags

• Potential for cost creep in CPAF contracts.
• Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure.
• Need for rigorous performance evaluation to justify award fees.

Tags

facilities-support, nasa, amentum-technology-inc, cost-plus-award-fee, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, virginia, research-and-development, operations-and-maintenance, long-term-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $38.5 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. IGF::CT::IGF THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MODULE (CMM) SYSTEM FOR FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL TASK ORDER WITH A STATEMENT OF WORK AND OTHER TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED FOR FUNDING OBLIGATIONS ONLY AND TO ACCOUNT FOR CMM AND SAP FINANCIAL SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY. THIS "TASK ORDER" IS TO FUND NNL13AA14C CLIN 3 (ENGINEERING). CENTER MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS, AND ENGINEERING (CMOE) CONTRACT. REQUIREMENT FOR THE MAINTENANC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $38.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-02-01. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at NASA's Langley Research Center?

Analyzing historical spending for facilities support at NASA's Langley Research Center (LARC) requires examining past contracts for similar services. Prior to this $38.5 million delivery order, LARC would have had existing contracts for maintenance, operations, and engineering (OME). These could include predecessor contracts under the Center Maintenance, Operations, and Engineering (CMOE) umbrella or separate contracts for specific facility types. Understanding the trend in spending over time – whether it has increased, decreased, or remained stable – provides context for the current award. Factors influencing historical spending include facility upgrades, changes in research focus, and shifts in government funding priorities. Without access to specific historical contract data for LARC's OME services, a precise trend cannot be determined, but it is reasonable to assume consistent investment in maintaining these critical research assets.

How does the performance of Amentum Technology, Inc. on other federal contracts compare to the potential performance under this award?

Amentum Technology, Inc. is a significant federal contractor with a substantial portfolio across various agencies and service areas. To assess their potential performance on this NASA contract, one would review their past performance evaluations, contract awards, and any reported issues or successes on similar facilities support or OME contracts. Key indicators include past performance ratings (e.g., CPARS reports), any contract disputes or terminations, and the successful completion of projects with similar scope and complexity. Amentum's track record suggests experience in managing large-scale government contracts. However, specific performance on this particular NASA delivery order will depend on effective execution, resource allocation, and responsiveness to NASA's evolving needs, particularly within the context of the Cost Plus Award Fee incentive structure.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract for facilities support?

Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contracts, like the one awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. for NASA's Langley Research Center facilities support, carry specific risks. A primary risk is the potential for contractor costs to escalate beyond initial projections, as the government reimburses allowable costs. While the 'award fee' component incentivizes performance, it can also lead to complex negotiations and subjective evaluations of whether the contractor earned their full fee. For taxpayers, the risk lies in potentially paying higher overall costs if the performance metrics are not clearly defined or if the evaluation process is not rigorous. Effective oversight is crucial to mitigate these risks, ensuring that costs are reasonable and that the award fee is genuinely tied to exceptional performance that provides clear value for money.

How does the scope of 'Facilities Support Services' typically vary across different federal agencies?

The scope of 'Facilities Support Services' can vary significantly across federal agencies, reflecting their diverse missions and infrastructure needs. For agencies like NASA, which operate highly technical research and development facilities, these services often encompass specialized engineering, complex maintenance of unique equipment, and stringent environmental controls. In contrast, agencies managing more standard office buildings might focus on routine maintenance, janitorial services, and basic building operations. The NAICS code 561210 (Facilities Support Services) is broad, covering everything from groundskeeping to integrated facility management. Therefore, while the core concept of maintaining physical infrastructure remains, the specific technical requirements, security protocols, and operational complexities can differ substantially based on the agency's primary function and the nature of the facilities being supported.

What are the implications of this contract being a 'Delivery Order' versus a 'Task Order' under a larger IDIQ?

This contract is identified as a 'Delivery Order' (aw: DELIVERY ORDER), which typically implies it is a specific order placed against a pre-existing contract vehicle, potentially an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar type of award. The data notes this 'TASK ORDER' has been created for funding purposes only and is not an actual task order with a statement of work, which is unusual. Assuming it functions as a delivery order for funding, it signifies a defined scope of work, a specific period of performance (February 1, 2014, to July 31, 2026), and a ceiling value ($38.5 million). Unlike a task order which might be one of many under a broader IDIQ, a delivery order often represents a more distinct procurement action. The implications are that the services and costs are defined for this specific order, and its execution is managed separately, though it might be part of a larger contracting strategy.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: NNL13458016R

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC

Address: 600 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD, TULLAHOMA, TN, 37388

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $40,595,294

Exercised Options: $40,595,294

Current Obligation: $38,473,500

Actual Outlays: $23,038,297

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 17

Total Subaward Amount: $817,004

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NNL13AA14C

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2014-02-01

Current End Date: 2026-07-31

Potential End Date: 2026-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-01

More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.

• THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
• Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
• Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
• Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
• Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)

View all Amentum Technology, Inc. federal contracts →

Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts

• International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
• TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
• Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
• Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
• Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)

View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending