NASA's $265M Facilities Support Contract Awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. for Long-Term Operations

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $264,648,889 ($264.6M)

Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Start Date: 2014-02-01

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 4,563 days

Daily Burn Rate: $58.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MODULE (CMM) SYSTEM FOR FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL TASK ORDER WITH A STATEMENT OF WORK AND OTHER TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED FOR FUNDING OBLIGATIONS ONLY AND TO ACCOUNT FOR CMM AND SAP FINANCIAL SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY. THIS "TASK ORDER" IS TO FUND NNL13AA14C CLIN 1 (MAINTENANCE). CENTER MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS, AND ENGINEERING (CMOE) CONTRACT. REQUIREMENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS, AND ENGINEERING OF LARC'S INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES AND HIGHLY TECHNICAL RESEARCH FACILITIES FOR MISSION SUCCESS. THE CMOE CONTRACT WILL PROVIDE CORE SUPPORT SERVICES TO LARC IN THE AREAS OF INSTITUTIONAL AND RESEARCH OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND ENGINEERING (OME). THESE TECHNICAL SERVICES INCLUDE: RESEARCH FACILITIES OPERATIONS (E.G., HIGHLY SPECIALIZED WIND TUNNELS, LABORATORIES, TEST STANDS, INSTRUMENTATION CALIBRATION/REPAIR) CENTRAL UTILITIES OPERATIONS (E.G., STEAM, COMPRESSED AIR, ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION, POTABLE WATER) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT/ADMINISTRATION (E.G., FACILITY AUTOMATION SYSTEMS [FAS], DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEMS [DAS]) RESEARCH AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITY MAINTENANCE (E.G., PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE, TROUBLE CALLS, RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE [RCM], FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT [FCA]) AND FACILITY ENGINEERING (E.G., DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT, TACTICAL ENGINEERING, PRESSURE SYSTEM RECERTIFICATION, PROJECT MANAGEMENT/PLANNING SUPPORT).

Place of Performance

Location: HAMPTON, HAMPTON CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23681

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $264.6 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MODULE (CMM) SYSTEM FOR FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL TASK ORDER WITH A STATEMENT OF WORK AND OTHER TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED FOR FUNDING OBLIGATIONS ONLY AN… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. for comprehensive facilities support services. 2. The contract has a long performance period, extending through July 2026. 3. Services include maintenance, operations, and engineering for institutional and research facilities. 4. This contract is crucial for supporting NASA's mission success at Langley Research Center. 5. The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, incentivizing performance. 6. Funding is allocated for maintenance and operations, indicating a focus on essential services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $264.6 million over its period of performance appears reasonable for comprehensive facilities support services at a major research center like NASA Langley. While specific cost breakdowns are not provided, the Cost Plus Award Fee structure allows for performance-based incentives, which can drive value. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities management contracts for federal research institutions would provide a more precise assessment of value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. This approach typically leads to a wider range of potential contractors and can foster competitive pricing. The number of bidders is not specified, but the full and open nature indicates that multiple companies had the opportunity to compete for this significant contract.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by promoting a competitive environment that can lead to more cost-effective solutions and better pricing for essential services.

Public Impact

NASA Langley Research Center benefits from sustained and high-quality maintenance, operations, and engineering services. Research and institutional facilities are kept in optimal condition, supporting critical scientific endeavors. The contract ensures the operational readiness of highly technical research facilities. The workforce involved in maintaining these facilities is supported through this contract. The geographic impact is concentrated at NASA Langley Research Center in Virginia.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

• Potential for cost overruns given the Cost Plus Award Fee structure if performance targets are not met efficiently.
• Long-term nature of the contract may reduce flexibility for future technological or operational changes.
• Dependence on a single contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance could pose risks if performance degrades.

Positive Signals

• Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
• Cost Plus Award Fee structure incentivizes contractor performance and efficiency.
• Long performance period provides stability for essential facility operations.
• Contract clearly defines scope for maintenance, operations, and engineering.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a critical component of government operations. This sector encompasses a wide range of services essential for maintaining government infrastructure, including building operations, maintenance, and engineering. The market for these services is substantial, with significant government spending allocated annually to ensure the functionality and safety of federal facilities. This contract with NASA represents a substantial portion of spending within this niche, focusing on highly technical research environments.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false and there is no indication of small business set-asides (ss) for this contract. This suggests that the primary award was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. However, the prime contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill portions of the contract requirements. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business subcontracting and its impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contracting officers and program managers. The Cost Plus Award Fee structure implies performance metrics that would be monitored to determine award fees. Transparency would be facilitated through contract reporting mechanisms and potentially public contract databases. Specific Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on NASA's internal oversight structure and any specific directives related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

• NASA Langley Research Center Operations and Maintenance
• Federal Facilities Management Contracts
• Research Facility Support Services
• Cost Plus Award Fee Contracts
• Large-Scale Government Service Contracts

Risk Flags

• Long contract duration may lead to misalignment with future needs.
• Cost Plus Award Fee structure requires careful performance monitoring to ensure value.
• Dependence on a single contractor for critical infrastructure.
• Potential for scope creep or changes in requirements over the contract life.

Tags

facilities-support, nasa, amentum-technology-inc, cost-plus-award-fee, full-and-open-competition, long-term-contract, research-facilities, maintenance-operations-engineering, virginia, delivery-order

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $264.6 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. IGF::CT::IGF THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MODULE (CMM) SYSTEM FOR FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL TASK ORDER WITH A STATEMENT OF WORK AND OTHER TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED FOR FUNDING OBLIGATIONS ONLY AND TO ACCOUNT FOR CMM AND SAP FINANCIAL SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY. THIS "TASK ORDER" IS TO FUND NNL13AA14C CLIN 1 (MAINTENANCE). CENTER MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS, AND ENGINEERING (CMOE) CONTRACT. REQUIREMENT FOR THE MAINTENANC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $264.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-02-01. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at NASA Langley Research Center?

Historical spending data for facilities support services at NASA Langley Research Center would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the contractors historically awarded these agreements. Analyzing past contracts, such as previous iterations of the CMOE contract or similar facilities management agreements, can provide context for the current $264.6 million award. This analysis would help determine if the current contract represents an increase or decrease in spending, and whether the scope of services has evolved. Understanding historical spending patterns is crucial for assessing the long-term financial commitment and identifying any significant shifts in NASA's approach to facility maintenance and operations.

How does Amentum Technology, Inc.'s performance on similar contracts compare to industry benchmarks?

Assessing Amentum Technology, Inc.'s performance on similar contracts requires access to performance evaluations, past performance questionnaires, and potentially debriefing information from prior federal awards. Benchmarking against industry standards for facilities support services would involve comparing metrics such as on-time delivery, cost control, quality of service, and customer satisfaction. If Amentum has a strong track record of successful performance on comparable large-scale government contracts, particularly those involving complex research facilities, it would indicate a lower performance risk for this NASA contract. Conversely, any documented performance issues or disputes on previous contracts would raise concerns about their ability to meet the requirements of this new award.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to determine award fees under this Cost Plus Award Fee contract?

The key performance indicators (KPIs) for this Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract are critical for understanding how Amentum Technology, Inc.'s performance will be evaluated and how award fees will be determined. While not explicitly detailed in the provided data, CPAF contracts typically include KPIs related to the quality of maintenance and operations, timeliness of response to issues, cost management, safety compliance, and overall customer satisfaction. NASA's contracting officers would establish specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals for these KPIs. The contractor's achievement against these metrics directly influences the 'award fee' portion of the contract, incentivizing them to exceed minimum requirements and deliver exceptional service.

What is the potential risk associated with the long duration (over 12 years) of this contract?

The long duration of this contract, spanning from February 2014 to July 2026 (over 12 years), presents several potential risks. Firstly, technological advancements or changes in NASA's research priorities could render current facility requirements or maintenance approaches obsolete, leading to a contract that is no longer optimally aligned with agency needs. Secondly, extended reliance on a single contractor might reduce competitive pressure over time, potentially leading to complacency or less aggressive cost management. Thirdly, unforeseen economic fluctuations or changes in federal budgeting priorities over such a long period could impact the contract's financial stability or necessitate difficult renegotiations. Managing these risks requires robust contract oversight, regular performance reviews, and potentially built-in flexibility for modifications.

How does the scope of 'Maintenance, Operations, and Engineering' for 'highly technical research facilities' differ from standard facility support?

The scope of 'Maintenance, Operations, and Engineering' (MOE) for 'highly technical research facilities' differs significantly from standard facility support due to the specialized nature of the equipment, environments, and operational demands. Standard facility support typically involves routine building maintenance, HVAC, janitorial services, and groundskeeping. In contrast, supporting highly technical research facilities requires expertise in maintaining sensitive scientific instruments, specialized environmental controls (e.g., clean rooms, vibration isolation), complex laboratory systems, unique power requirements, and potentially hazardous material handling. The engineering component is also more pronounced, involving the design, modification, and upkeep of sophisticated infrastructure critical to ongoing research, demanding a higher level of technical skill and specialized knowledge from the contractor.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: NNL13458016R

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC

Address: 600 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD, TULLAHOMA, TN, 37388

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $283,084,573

Exercised Options: $283,084,573

Current Obligation: $264,648,889

Actual Outlays: $156,508,760

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 224

Total Subaward Amount: $20,109,406

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NNL13AA14C

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2014-02-01

Current End Date: 2026-07-31

Potential End Date: 2026-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-01

More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.

• THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
• Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
• Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
• Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
• Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)

View all Amentum Technology, Inc. federal contracts →

Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts

• International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
• TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
• Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
• Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
• Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)

View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending