NASA awards $10.3M contract for electronics fabrication support to Science & Technology Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,308,633 ($10.3M)
Contractor: Science & Technology Corporation
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2005-01-28
End Date: 2010-01-27
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: PROVIDE PHASE IN EFFORT AND PR0VIDE ELECTRONICS AND FABRICATION SUPPORT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: HAMPTON, HAMPTON (CITY) County, VIRGINIA, 23666, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $10.3 million to SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION for work described as: PROVIDE PHASE IN EFFORT AND PR0VIDE ELECTRONICS AND FABRICATION SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Science & Technology Corporation for electronics and fabrication support. 2. The contract value is $10.3 million over a 5-year period. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 4. The sector is primarily IT/Electronics Manufacturing, supporting NASA's scientific and technological endeavors.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $10.3 million over five years averages $2.06 million annually. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized electronics fabrication and support services is difficult without more specific details on the scope of work and required technologies. However, the duration and value suggest a moderate-sized, specialized service contract.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the agency to select the best value offering. The price discovery is likely robust due to the competitive nature of the award.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing competitive pricing for necessary services.
Public Impact
Supports NASA's scientific and technological research and development through specialized electronics manufacturing. Potential for technological advancements stemming from the fabrication support services provided. The contract duration of five years provides stability for the contractor and consistent support for NASA projects.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics or deliverables in the provided data.
- Potential for cost overruns if the scope of 'fabrication support' is not clearly defined.
- Limited visibility into the specific technologies or complexity of the electronic assemblies.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Long-term contract provides stability for a critical support function.
- Contractor has experience in electronics manufacturing (NAICS 334418).
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology and Electronics Manufacturing sector, specifically supporting the aerospace industry. Spending benchmarks for specialized electronics fabrication and support services can vary widely based on complexity, volume, and required certifications. NASA's spending in this area is critical for its mission success.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (sb: false). The contract was awarded to Science & Technology Corporation, and it is unclear from the provided information if they are a large or small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine the impact on small businesses in this sector.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically be managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers to ensure the contractor meets performance requirements and adheres to contract terms. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides some cost control, but ongoing monitoring of quality and delivery is essential.
Related Government Programs
- Printed Circuit Assembly (Electronic Assembly) Manufacturing
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed scope of work.
- Potential for undefined technical challenges in specialized fabrication.
- Limited information on contractor's past performance or specific expertise.
- No clear indication of small business utilization.
Tags
printed-circuit-assembly-electronic-asse, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $10.3 million to SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION. PROVIDE PHASE IN EFFORT AND PR0VIDE ELECTRONICS AND FABRICATION SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-01-28. End: 2010-01-27.
What specific types of electronic assemblies and fabrication support are included in this contract, and how do they align with NASA's current and future mission needs?
The contract specifies 'Printed Circuit Assembly (Electronic Assembly) Manufacturing' and 'Electronics and Fabrication Support Services'. This likely includes the production of circuit boards, assembly of electronic components, testing, and potentially design support for specialized aerospace applications. Alignment with NASA's needs would depend on the specific projects requiring these capabilities, such as satellite systems, scientific instruments, or ground support equipment, ensuring technological relevance and mission criticality.
Given the firm-fixed-price structure, what mechanisms are in place to manage potential scope creep or unforeseen technical challenges in complex electronic fabrication?
While firm-fixed-price contracts aim to control costs, managing scope creep and technical challenges requires robust contract management. NASA likely employs change order processes for any deviations from the original scope, requiring justification and potential contract modifications. Technical oversight by NASA engineers would identify issues early, and clear communication channels with the contractor are crucial to address unforeseen problems proactively before they significantly impact cost or schedule.
How does the performance of Science & Technology Corporation on this contract compare to industry benchmarks for quality, on-time delivery, and innovation in electronics fabrication?
Assessing performance against industry benchmarks requires access to specific contract performance data, such as quality acceptance rates, on-time delivery metrics, and any documented innovations. Without this detailed performance history, a direct comparison is not possible. However, NASA's continued engagement with a contractor over a five-year period, especially under a competitive award, suggests a baseline level of satisfactory performance, though continuous evaluation is standard practice.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing › Printed Circuit Assembly (Electronic Assembly) Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 10 BASIL SAWYER DR, HAMPTON, VA, 23666
Business Categories: Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $20,000,000
Exercised Options: $20,000,000
Current Obligation: $10,308,633
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNL05AA00B
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-01-28
Current End Date: 2010-01-27
Potential End Date: 2010-01-27 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-10-15
More Contracts from Science & Technology Corporation
- Data Support Services — $52.5M (Department of Defense)
- Systems Engineering Services (SES) — $33.8M (Department of Commerce)
- Aeronautics and Exploration Mission Modeling and Simulation (aemms)support — $29.1M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Data Support Services — $18.6M (Department of Defense)
- Devcom CBC BPA Call 03 TAS Cbrne Support — $12.2M (General Services Administration)
View all Science & Technology Corporation federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →