NASA awards $20.3M contract for waste management services at Florida space facilities over 10 years
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,294,451 ($20.3M)
Contractor: Indyne, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2008-09-16
End Date: 2018-09-30
Contract Duration: 3,666 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.5K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MANAGEMENT, LABOR, EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY/EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO PROVIDE SOLID WASTE, REFUSE AND GARBAGE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR PATRICK AIR FORCE BASE (PAFB) TO INCLUDE MALABAR ANNEX, CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION (CCAFS) AND KENNEDY SPACE CENTER (KSC) AS WELL AS APPROXIMATELY 524 MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING(MFH) UNITS LOCATED AT PAFB.
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, BREVARD County, FLORIDA, 32899
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $20.3 million to INDYNE, INC. for work described as: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MANAGEMENT, LABOR, EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY/EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO PROVIDE SOLID WASTE, REFUSE AND GARBAGE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR PATRICK AIR FORCE BASE (PAFB) TO INCLUDE MALABAR ANNE… Key points: 1. Contract provides comprehensive waste management, including collection and disposal, for key NASA and Air Force installations. 2. The services encompass multiple sites, including Patrick Air Force Base, Malabar Annex, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, and Kennedy Space Center. 3. The contract duration spans approximately 10 years, indicating a long-term need for these essential support services. 4. The award was made as a competitive delivery order, suggesting a structured procurement process. 5. The contractor is responsible for providing all necessary labor, equipment, and vehicles, with limited government-furnished property. 6. This contract supports critical base operations and housing facilities, ensuring environmental compliance and operational readiness.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $20.3 million over 10 years for comprehensive waste management services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities support contracts for waste management suggests this pricing is within expected ranges. The cost-plus-incentive-fee structure allows for performance-based adjustments, potentially driving efficiency and value for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple offerors likely had the opportunity to bid. The presence of competition is a positive sign for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing for the services. The specific number of bidders is not detailed, but the 'full-and-open' competition suggests a robust bidding environment.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces. This approach maximizes the value received for the funds allocated to waste management services.
Public Impact
Residents and personnel at Patrick Air Force Base, Malabar Annex, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, and Kennedy Space Center benefit from reliable waste disposal services. Essential services include solid waste, refuse, and garbage collection and disposal, maintaining sanitary conditions. The geographic impact is concentrated in Florida, supporting critical national space and defense infrastructure. The contract supports a workforce involved in facilities management and environmental services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if incentive fee targets are not met or if unforeseen operational challenges arise.
- Reliance on a single contractor for a decade could lead to complacency if performance monitoring is not rigorous.
- Disruption of services due to contractor performance issues could impact base operations and housing.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process suggests potential for cost savings and efficient service delivery.
- Long-term contract provides stability and predictability for essential waste management services.
- Incentive fee structure encourages contractor performance and potentially better value.
- Comprehensive service scope ensures all waste management needs are addressed.
Sector Analysis
The facilities support services sector, particularly waste management, is a critical component of government operations, ensuring environmental compliance and operational continuity. This contract fits within the broader market for outsourced facility maintenance and logistics. Comparable spending benchmarks for large federal installations often involve multi-million dollar contracts for comprehensive services like waste management, reflecting the scale and complexity of these operations.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While the primary awardee is INDYNE, INC., the contract type (competitive delivery order) does not preclude subcontracting opportunities. The extent to which small businesses may be involved as subcontractors is not detailed but is a potential area for further investigation to ensure opportunities within the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are likely embedded within the Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure, which ties contractor payment to performance metrics. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance data may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Base Operations Support (BOS)
- Facilities Maintenance Services
- Environmental Services Contracts
- Waste Disposal and Recycling Services
- Logistics and Support Services
Risk Flags
- Long-term contract duration may reduce flexibility for future service adjustments.
- Cost-plus contract type can present risks of cost overruns if not closely managed.
- Dependence on a single contractor for essential services requires robust oversight.
Tags
facilities-support-services, waste-management, nasa, patrick-air-force-base, kennedy-space-center, cape-canaveral-air-force-station, florida, competitive-delivery-order, cost-plus-incentive-fee, long-term-contract, environmental-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $20.3 million to INDYNE, INC.. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MANAGEMENT, LABOR, EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY/EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO PROVIDE SOLID WASTE, REFUSE AND GARBAGE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR PATRICK AIR FORCE BASE (PAFB) TO INCLUDE MALABAR ANNEX, CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION (CCAFS) AND KENNEDY SPACE CENTER (KSC) AS WELL AS APPROXIMATELY 524 MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING(MFH) UNITS LOCATED AT PAFB.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INDYNE, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-09-16. End: 2018-09-30.
What is INDYNE, INC.'s track record with similar government contracts, particularly in facilities support and waste management?
INDYNE, INC. has a history of performing various government contracts, including those related to facilities support and base operations. While specific details on their waste management performance for NASA are not fully elaborated in the provided data, their selection for this significant contract suggests they met the agency's requirements and demonstrated capability. A deeper dive into their contract performance history, including past performance evaluations and any reported issues on similar contracts, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability and expertise in this domain. Examining their portfolio of awarded contracts across different agencies can reveal patterns in their service offerings and client base.
How does the awarded price compare to industry benchmarks for similar waste management services at large federal facilities?
The awarded contract value of approximately $20.3 million over 10 years, averaging around $2 million annually, appears competitive for the comprehensive scope of services provided. This includes collection, disposal, and management of solid waste, refuse, and garbage for multiple large federal installations like Patrick Air Force Base and Kennedy Space Center, along with housing units. Industry benchmarks for similar large-scale facilities support contracts, especially those involving environmental services and waste management at significant operational sites, often fall within this range. The Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure also suggests an effort to align costs with performance, potentially leading to better value than a fixed-price contract if managed effectively.
What are the primary risk indicators associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Primary risk indicators for this contract include potential cost overruns inherent in a Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure, especially if operational challenges or unforeseen circumstances arise. Another risk is the long-term reliance on a single contractor, which could lead to complacency if performance monitoring is not consistently rigorous. Service disruption due to contractor performance issues is also a concern, potentially impacting critical base operations. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust performance metrics defined in the contract, regular oversight by NASA personnel, and the incentive fee structure itself, which encourages the contractor to meet or exceed performance targets to maximize their profit. Clear communication channels and contingency planning would also be crucial.
How effective has the competitive delivery order process been in ensuring value for money for this waste management service?
The competitive delivery order process is generally designed to ensure value for money by fostering competition among potential providers. By allowing multiple qualified contractors to bid on the requirement, NASA likely secured more favorable pricing and service terms than through a sole-source or limited competition approach. The 'full-and-open' nature of the competition suggests a broad market engagement. While the specific savings achieved through this competition are not detailed, the process itself is a key mechanism for achieving cost-effectiveness. The long-term nature of the contract and the CPIF structure further aim to optimize value over the duration of the service period.
What is the historical spending pattern for waste management services at these specific Florida facilities prior to this contract?
The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for waste management services at Patrick Air Force Base, Malabar Annex, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, and Kennedy Space Center. To assess historical spending, one would need to access previous contract awards and their associated values for these facilities. Analyzing past expenditures would allow for a comparison with the current $20.3 million award over 10 years, helping to determine if spending has increased, decreased, or remained relatively stable. This historical context is crucial for understanding trends in service costs and identifying potential efficiencies or cost escalations over time.
Are there any specific performance metrics or Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) tied to the incentive fee structure in this contract?
The data indicates this is a Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract, which inherently means performance metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are tied to the incentive fee structure. However, the specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided summary. Typically, for waste management services, these KPIs could include metrics such as on-time collection rates, proper disposal methods, recycling rates, environmental compliance adherence, response times to service requests, and overall cleanliness of facilities. The incentive fee would be adjusted based on the contractor's performance against these predefined metrics, rewarding superior performance and potentially penalizing substandard service.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 11800 SUNRISE VALLEY DR, RESTON, VA, 20191
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,586,078
Exercised Options: $24,586,078
Current Obligation: $20,294,451
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA252108D0006
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-09-16
Current End Date: 2018-09-30
Potential End Date: 2018-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-07-26
More Contracts from Indyne, Inc.
- Federal Contract — $968.4M (Department of Defense)
- 200310!000264!5700!CA12 !30 Cons/Lgc !F0468403C0050 !A!N! !Y! !20030711!20030930!161909049!161909049!161909049!n!indyne, Inc !6862 ELM Street !mclean !va!22101!48376!059!51!mclean !fairfax !virginia !+000000400000!n!n!000047964924!r426!communications Services !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !517110!A!B!3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!v!2!007!k! !C!Y!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !C! !b!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $778.3M (Department of Defense)
- This IS a Continued Contract for FA2517-18-C-8000. Solid State Phased Array Radar System (sspars) Originally Awarded AS FA2517-18-C-8000, Providing Non-Personal Services to Perform Operations, Maintenance and Support 24/7 for the Sspars System — $348.4M (Department of Defense)
- 45 SW FY09 Funding for Ioms Sustainment — $282.2M (Department of Defense)
- Provide Communications Services, Telephone Service Requirements/Photo — $262.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →