NASA awards $23.3M custodial services contract to Integrity National Corporation, spanning over 4 years
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,272,834 ($23.3M)
Contractor: Integrity National Corporation
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2008-01-30
End Date: 2012-07-31
Contract Duration: 1,644 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: CUSTODIAL SERVICES AT JOHNSON SPACE CENTER, ELLINGTON FIELD, AND SONNY CARTER TRAINING FACILITY
Place of Performance
Location: HOUSTON, HARRIS County, TEXAS, 77058
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $23.3 million to INTEGRITY NATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: CUSTODIAL SERVICES AT JOHNSON SPACE CENTER, ELLINGTON FIELD, AND SONNY CARTER TRAINING FACILITY Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the duration and scope of services. 2. Full and open competition suggests potential for competitive pricing. 3. Contract duration and fixed-price nature may mitigate cost overrun risks. 4. Services are critical for maintaining operational readiness at key NASA facilities. 5. Contract falls within the janitorial services sector, a common government procurement area.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $23.3 million over 4 years for custodial services at multiple NASA facilities appears to be within a reasonable range for such a large-scale operation. Benchmarking against similar large federal custodial contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost increases, which is generally favorable for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of 6 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this service. This competitive environment is expected to drive more favorable pricing and service quality for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition indicates that taxpayer dollars are likely being used efficiently, as multiple companies vied to offer the best value, potentially leading to lower overall costs than a sole-source or limited competition award.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA personnel and operations at Johnson Space Center, Ellington Field, and the Sonny Carter Training Facility, ensuring a clean and safe working environment. Essential janitorial and custodial services are delivered, contributing to the upkeep and functionality of critical space exploration infrastructure. The geographic impact is concentrated in Texas, specifically around the Houston area, supporting local federal facilities. While not a direct workforce creation contract, it supports the employment of custodial staff through the prime contractor, Integrity National Corporation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for service quality degradation if contractor prioritizes cost-cutting over thoroughness.
- Reliance on a single contractor for essential facility maintenance could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
- Limited transparency on specific performance metrics and quality control measures employed by the contractor.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract structure incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost control.
- Full and open competition suggests a strong initial vetting of potential service providers.
- Long-term contract provides stability for service delivery and facility management.
Sector Analysis
Custodial services represent a significant segment of the facilities maintenance market within the broader government contracting landscape. This contract for NASA aligns with typical spending patterns for large federal agencies requiring extensive upkeep of their physical infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks for janitorial services at large federal installations can vary widely based on square footage, geographic location, and specific service requirements, but this $23.3M award over four years suggests a substantial scope of work.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal, though the prime contractor may engage small businesses for specific support services not detailed here.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by NASA's contracting officers and facility managers responsible for the Johnson Space Center and associated sites. Performance monitoring, quality assurance checks, and adherence to contract terms are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though detailed operational oversight specifics are not publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Custodial Services
- NASA Facility Maintenance Contracts
- Janitorial Services Contracts
- Large-Scale Government Cleaning Contracts
Risk Flags
- Contract duration may exceed optimal performance review cycles.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics in public data.
- Potential for scope creep if not tightly managed.
Tags
janitorial-services, nasa, johnson-space-center, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, texas, facilities-maintenance, large-contract, service-contract, federal-agency
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $23.3 million to INTEGRITY NATIONAL CORPORATION. CUSTODIAL SERVICES AT JOHNSON SPACE CENTER, ELLINGTON FIELD, AND SONNY CARTER TRAINING FACILITY
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INTEGRITY NATIONAL CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-01-30. End: 2012-07-31.
What is the track record of Integrity National Corporation in performing similar large-scale federal custodial contracts?
Integrity National Corporation has a history of performing federal contracts, including custodial and facilities maintenance services. While specific details on past performance for contracts of this exact magnitude and scope are not immediately available in this summary, their award by NASA suggests they met the agency's pre-qualification and performance requirements. A deeper dive into their contract history, including past performance reviews and any reported disputes or awards, would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment of their track record. Federal procurement databases and agency performance rating systems (like CPARS) are typically used to evaluate contractor performance on previous engagements.
How does the per-square-foot cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar federal facilities?
Without the specific square footage of the facilities covered (Johnson Space Center, Ellington Field, and Sonny Carter Training Facility), a precise per-square-foot cost comparison is not feasible. However, the total contract value of $23.3 million over approximately 1644 days (4.5 years) averages to roughly $14,156 per day. This daily rate, when divided by the total square footage, would need to be compared against industry benchmarks for federal custodial services, which can range significantly based on location, service intensity, and specific requirements. Generally, larger facilities and those with specialized needs (like clean rooms or sensitive equipment areas) command higher per-square-foot costs.
What are the primary risk indicators associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risk indicators include potential for service quality degradation, contractor performance issues, and unforeseen cost increases (though mitigated by fixed-price). Mitigation strategies likely involve robust performance monitoring by NASA, clearly defined service level agreements (SLAs) within the contract, and contingency planning. The firm fixed-price nature shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor. NASA's oversight and the competitive nature of the award also serve as risk mitigation factors, ensuring accountability and a baseline level of service quality.
How effective has full and open competition been in ensuring value for money for this specific contract?
The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award mechanism, with 6 bidders, suggests a competitive environment that is generally conducive to achieving value for money. This process allows multiple qualified vendors to submit proposals, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. While the final award price reflects the negotiated value, the competitive bidding process itself is a strong indicator that NASA sought and likely achieved a favorable price point relative to the market. Post-award performance monitoring would further confirm the sustained value delivered.
What is the historical spending pattern for custodial services at these NASA facilities prior to this contract?
Historical spending data for custodial services at these specific NASA facilities prior to this contract (awarded in 2008 for a period ending in 2012) would provide valuable context. Understanding previous contract values, durations, and awarded contractors would reveal trends in spending, potential cost escalations, and the stability of service providers. Without this historical data, it's difficult to assess if the $23.3 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in custodial services compared to prior periods. Analyzing past spending can also highlight any shifts in service requirements or contract structures.
Are there any specific performance metrics or KPIs included in the contract that demonstrate the contractor's effectiveness?
The provided data does not detail the specific performance metrics or Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) included in the contract. However, for a contract of this nature and value, it is highly probable that NASA included detailed performance standards related to cleanliness, response times for issues, staff availability, and adherence to safety protocols. These metrics are crucial for oversight and ensuring the contractor meets the required service levels. The effectiveness of the contractor is typically evaluated against these pre-defined metrics throughout the contract period.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Services to Buildings and Dwellings › Janitorial Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: NNJ06162823RB
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 176 THOMAS JOHNSON DR STE 104, FREDERICK, MD, 06
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $30,192,688
Exercised Options: $25,950,155
Current Obligation: $23,272,834
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-01-30
Current End Date: 2012-07-31
Potential End Date: 2013-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-09-23
More Contracts from Integrity National Corporation
- This Requisition IS for Custodial and Waste Removal Services — $29.7M (Department of Agriculture)
- DOL FPB Janitorial&snow Removal Services — $22.2M (Department of Labor)
- Contractor Will Provide Janitorial, Grounds Keeping and Snow Removal Services AT the United States Mint Denver — $10.0M (Department of the Treasury)
- Oo/Om Custodial Services and Waste Removal — $7.2M (Department of Agriculture)
- Provide Janitorial and Snow Removal Services for Usm-Ph — $6.9M (Department of the Treasury)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →