NASA's $11.9M HRPO Support Contract Awarded to Anadarko Industries for IT Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,910,329 ($11.9M)
Contractor: Anadarko Industries, L.L.C.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2005-06-28
End Date: 2011-04-30
Contract Duration: 2,132 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 13
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: HUMAN RESOURCES & PROCUREMENT OFFICE SUPPORT SERVICES (HRPO)
Place of Performance
Location: HOUSTON, HARRIS County, TEXAS, 77058
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $11.9 million to ANADARKO INDUSTRIES, L.L.C. for work described as: HUMAN RESOURCES & PROCUREMENT OFFICE SUPPORT SERVICES (HRPO) Key points: 1. Contract awarded for IT and procurement support services. 2. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests defined scope and cost control. 3. Long duration of 2132 days indicates a significant, ongoing need. 4. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 5. Contractor has a track record with this specific NASA office. 6. Services provided are essential for administrative and operational functions. 7. Geographic location of contractor in Texas may influence local economic impact.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $11.9 million over approximately 5.8 years averages to about $2.05 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar IT and procurement support contracts within NASA or other federal agencies is challenging without more granular data on the specific services rendered. However, the duration and total value suggest a substantial investment. The firm fixed-price nature implies that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for value if the scope is well-defined and managed.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating that the solicitation was broadly advertised and multiple bids were likely considered. The presence of 13 bids suggests a competitive environment, which generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government. This level of competition is a positive sign for achieving value for taxpayer money.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process for this contract helps ensure that NASA is obtaining services at a reasonable price, preventing potential overspending and maximizing the utility of federal funds.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA's Human Resources & Procurement Office by providing essential support services. Ensures continuity and efficiency in critical administrative functions. Supports the operational needs of a major federal agency. Potential for indirect workforce implications through contractor employment.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep given the long contract duration.
- Reliance on a single contractor for extended support could pose risks if performance degrades.
- Ensuring continued alignment with evolving NASA IT and procurement needs over 5+ years.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a fair and competitive process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type helps manage cost certainty.
- Contractor has prior experience supporting this specific NASA office.
- Long-term nature suggests a stable and reliable service provider.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader Information Technology and Professional Services sector. The market for IT support and procurement services for federal agencies is substantial, with numerous companies vying for these contracts. NASA, as a major federal entity, represents a significant client. Benchmarking spending requires comparing the scope of services (HR and procurement support) against similar contracts for IT services and administrative support within the federal government, which often run into millions of dollars annually.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside provision. The primary contractor, Anadarko Industries, L.L.C., is likely a larger entity, and the contract's value does not inherently suggest a focus on small business participation unless specified in the contract's performance requirements, which are not detailed here.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contracting officer and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price structure, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon cost. Transparency is generally facilitated through federal contract databases like FPDS, where award details are published. NASA's Office of Inspector General may conduct audits or investigations if performance issues or potential fraud are identified.
Related Government Programs
- NASA IT Support Services
- Federal Procurement Support Contracts
- Human Resources Information Systems
- Administrative Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may lead to technology obsolescence.
- Potential for vendor lock-in over the extended performance period.
- Need for continuous monitoring to ensure evolving IT needs are met.
Tags
it-services, procurement-support, nasa, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, professional-services, administrative-support, texas, large-contract, it-consulting
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $11.9 million to ANADARKO INDUSTRIES, L.L.C.. HUMAN RESOURCES & PROCUREMENT OFFICE SUPPORT SERVICES (HRPO)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ANADARKO INDUSTRIES, L.L.C..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-06-28. End: 2011-04-30.
What is the specific nature of the 'Other Computer Related Services' (NAICS 541519) provided under this contract?
The NAICS code 541519, 'Other Computer Related Services,' is broad and encompasses a range of IT services not classified elsewhere. For this specific contract, 'HUMAN RESOURCES & PROCUREMENT OFFICE SUPPORT SERVICES (HRPO)' suggests the services likely include IT support for HR and procurement systems, data management, potentially software maintenance or development related to these functions, and general IT consulting. Without the full contract statement of work, the precise services remain generalized. However, the context points towards operational and administrative IT functions crucial for the HRPO's mission within NASA.
How does the $11.9 million total contract value compare to similar HR and procurement IT support contracts at NASA?
Comparing the $11.9 million total contract value for HRPO support services requires a benchmark of similar contracts within NASA. Contracts for IT support and administrative functions can vary widely based on scope, duration, and complexity. An $11.9 million award over nearly six years (2132 days) averages roughly $2 million per year. This figure appears moderate for a federal agency like NASA, which manages complex IT infrastructures and administrative processes. However, a precise comparison would necessitate analyzing contracts with identical or highly similar service descriptions and durations within NASA's portfolio.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Anadarko Industries, L.L.C.'s performance on this contract?
Specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are not publicly detailed in the provided data. However, typical KPIs for IT and procurement support services often include system uptime and availability, response times for IT support requests, successful completion of procurement actions, data accuracy and integrity, adherence to project timelines, and user satisfaction surveys. For a firm fixed-price contract, meeting the defined scope and service levels within budget is paramount. NASA would likely have established metrics within the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) to monitor Anadarko's adherence to these requirements.
What is Anadarko Industries, L.L.C.'s track record with NASA prior to this award?
Anadarko Industries, L.L.C. has a history of contracting with NASA, as indicated by this award for HRPO support services. The fact that they were awarded this contract, especially under full and open competition, suggests they met NASA's requirements and demonstrated capability. Further investigation into their past performance records, including any previous contracts, their values, durations, and performance evaluations (if publicly available), would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their track record with the agency.
What are the potential risks associated with a long-duration contract (2132 days) for IT support services?
Long-duration contracts, like this 2132-day (approx. 5.8 years) award, carry several potential risks. Technology evolves rapidly, and a contract spanning several years might not keep pace with the latest advancements, potentially leading to outdated systems or inefficient processes. There's also a risk of vendor lock-in, making it difficult to switch providers if performance declines or needs change significantly. Furthermore, institutional knowledge can become concentrated within the contractor, posing a challenge if the contract is not renewed or is transferred. Ensuring flexibility and regular reviews within the contract's framework is crucial to mitigate these risks.
How does the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' classification impact the contract's value and transparency?
The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' classification signifies a robust procurement process. It means the solicitation was widely advertised, allowing all responsible sources to submit bids, but specific sources might have been excluded based on pre-defined criteria (e.g., security clearances, specific technical capabilities not met by all). This approach aims to maximize competition while ensuring that only qualified bidders participate, theoretically leading to better pricing and value. It enhances transparency by making the bidding process open to a wide range of potential contractors, thereby increasing the likelihood of competitive pricing and preventing sole-source situations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: NNJ0468717R
Offers Received: 13
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 500 DALLAS ST, STE-2750, HOUSTON, TX, 90
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Emerging Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,036,615
Exercised Options: $15,036,615
Current Obligation: $11,910,329
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-06-28
Current End Date: 2011-04-30
Potential End Date: 2011-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-04-04
More Contracts from Anadarko Industries, L.L.C.
- Johnson Space Center Institutional Safety Services (ciss)to Inlcude Fire Protection, Safety, Maintenance of Fire Protection Systems, Training, Test Safety and Special Projects — $29.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Consolidated Support for Afosr (CSA) — $20.5M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →