NASA's $14.9M Media Fusion Contract for IT Services Awarded Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,904,177 ($14.9M)
Contractor: Media Fusion, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2007-05-01
End Date: 2012-04-30
Contract Duration: 1,826 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: COMM SERVICES CONTRACT
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20546
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $14.9 million to MEDIA FUSION, LLC for work described as: COMM SERVICES CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract Value: $14.9 million over 5 years. 2. Competition: Awarded via full and open competition. 3. Risk: Cost Plus Award Fee contract type may incentivize overspending. 4. Sector: Information Technology services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's cost-plus award fee structure allows for flexibility but requires careful monitoring to ensure value for money. Benchmarking against similar IT service contracts is recommended to validate pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing by allowing all eligible vendors to bid.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs and improves service quality.
Public Impact
Ensures access to IT services for NASA's mission. Supports a competitive market for IT service providers. Potential for innovation through award fee incentives.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 81 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure can lead to higher costs if not managed effectively.
- No indication of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Long-term contract provides stability for service delivery.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT services sector, which is a significant area of government spending. Benchmarks for similar IT service contracts can vary widely based on complexity and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business subcontracting opportunities were pursued or mandated.
Oversight & Accountability
NASA's procurement processes and contract management systems are designed to ensure oversight. The award fee mechanism requires performance metrics to be established and monitored.
Related Government Programs
- Other Computer Related Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF structure.
- Lack of small business participation noted.
- Contract duration of 5 years may not be optimal for rapidly evolving IT needs.
- Specific performance metrics for award fee are not detailed.
Tags
other-computer-related-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, dc, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $14.9 million to MEDIA FUSION, LLC. COMM SERVICES CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MEDIA FUSION, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-05-01. End: 2012-04-30.
What specific IT services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with NASA's strategic objectives?
The contract, NAICS code 541519, covers 'Other Computer Related Services.' While specific service details are not provided, these typically include IT consulting, system integration, and IT support. Alignment with NASA's objectives would depend on how these services directly contribute to space exploration, research, and operational needs.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) tied to the award fee, and how are they measured to ensure contractor performance?
The award fee structure implies that specific performance metrics and KPIs are defined within the contract. These likely relate to service delivery, system uptime, responsiveness, and potentially innovation. NASA's contracting officers would be responsible for objectively measuring performance against these KPIs to determine award fee amounts.
How does the 'Cost Plus Award Fee' structure compare to other contract types in terms of cost efficiency for similar IT services?
Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contracts are often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined or when innovation is highly valued. While CPAF offers flexibility and incentivizes performance, it can be more expensive than fixed-price contracts if not managed diligently. Its cost efficiency relative to other types depends heavily on the specific project and effective oversight.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services
Product/Service Code: PHOTO, MAP, PRINT, PUBLICATION › PHOTOGR, MAPPING, PRINTING, PUBLISH
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4951 CENTURY ST NW, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 05
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,183,072
Exercised Options: $15,183,072
Current Obligation: $14,904,177
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-05-01
Current End Date: 2012-04-30
Potential End Date: 2012-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-09-27
More Contracts from Media Fusion, LLC
- Center Administrative&technical Support Services — $26.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Materials, Equipment and Supplies Task Order 80msfc21f0012 Awarded Against Sraces Contract 80msfc21d0011 — $8.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →