NASA Awards $34.2M for Flight Projects Building Construction to SEMI USA CORPORATION
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $34,199,506 ($34.2M)
Contractor: Semi USA Corporation
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2012-12-20
End Date: 2015-06-18
Contract Duration: 910 days
Daily Burn Rate: $37.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 17
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE PERSONNEL, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLIGHT PROJECTS BUILDING
Place of Performance
Location: GREENBELT, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20771
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $34.2 million to SEMI USA CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE PERSONNEL, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLIGHT PROJECTS BUILDING Key points: 1. The contract value of $34.2 million is substantial for a single building construction project. 2. SEMI USA CORPORATION secured this contract under full and open competition. 3. The project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. 4. The firm fixed price contract type suggests a clear scope and budget.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $34.2 million appears to be within a reasonable range for a large-scale institutional building project. Benchmarking against similar NASA or federal construction projects would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to compete. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for this construction project, with the expectation of receiving a valuable asset in return for the investment.
Public Impact
Construction of a new building for NASA's flight projects, potentially enhancing research and operational capabilities. Economic impact through job creation and material sourcing within the construction sector. Long-term asset for the government, supporting future space exploration and aeronautics initiatives.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen construction challenges arise.
- Dependence on SEMI USA CORPORATION for timely and quality completion.
- Risk of delays impacting NASA's flight project timelines.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Firm fixed price contract limits potential for cost increases.
- Project supports critical NASA infrastructure.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on project scale, location, and specific requirements. Federal construction projects often involve complex specifications and stringent quality controls.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this specific award (sb: false). The prime contractor, SEMI USA CORPORATION, is not identified as a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were made available to small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically be managed by NASA's contracting officers and potentially an on-site representative to ensure adherence to contract terms, quality standards, and project milestones. Regular reporting and inspections are standard accountability measures.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract duration of 910 days (approx. 2.5 years) may be subject to delays.
- Firm Fixed Price contract offers limited flexibility for scope changes.
- No explicit mention of small business subcontracting goals.
- Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, md, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $34.2 million to SEMI USA CORPORATION. IGF::OT::IGF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE PERSONNEL, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLIGHT PROJECTS BUILDING
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SEMI USA CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $34.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-12-20. End: 2015-06-18.
What is the estimated cost per square foot for this building construction compared to similar federal or commercial projects?
Without specific details on the building's size and features, a precise cost per square foot benchmark is difficult. However, for institutional buildings of this scale, costs can range widely. A thorough analysis would compare the awarded price against recent construction data for comparable facilities in the same geographic region, considering material costs, labor rates, and specialized requirements for flight project facilities.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and penalties associated with this contract to mitigate performance risks?
The contract details do not explicitly list KPIs or penalties. However, as a firm fixed price contract, SEMI USA CORPORATION is incentivized to complete the project within budget and schedule. NASA likely has clauses for liquidated damages or termination for default if significant delays or quality issues arise, ensuring accountability for performance.
How does the completion of this building align with NASA's long-term strategic goals for its flight projects?
The construction of a dedicated Flight Projects Building suggests a strategic investment by NASA to consolidate or expand critical operational and research capabilities. This facility is likely intended to support current and future missions, enhance collaboration among project teams, and provide necessary infrastructure for advanced aeronautics and space exploration endeavors.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: NNG13412656E
Offers Received: 17
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2800 POST OAK BLVD STE 5858, HOUSTON, TX, 77056
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $34,199,506
Exercised Options: $34,199,506
Current Obligation: $34,199,506
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-12-20
Current End Date: 2015-06-18
Potential End Date: 2015-06-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-03-13
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →