NASA awards $486M for Geostationary Lightning Mapper instrument development and support through 2039

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $486,224,471 ($486.2M)

Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corporation

Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Start Date: 2007-12-13

End Date: 2039-06-25

Contract Duration: 11,517 days

Daily Burn Rate: $42.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TAS::80 0110::TAS GEOSTATIONARY LIGHTNING MAPPER (GLM) INSTRUMENT THE FOR GEOSTATIONARY OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITES (GOES) R. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE PERSONNEL, MATERIALS, FACILITIES AND OTHER RESOURCES TO DESIGN, DEVELOP, DELIVER (TO THE DESIGNATED DESTINATION) AND SUPPORT UNDER THE BASIC CONTRACT: A) PARTS AND MATERIALS FOR AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT UNIT (EDU) AND 4 FLIGHT MODELS B) ONE GLM ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT UNIT (EDU) C) ONE GLM PROTO-FLIGHT MODEL (PFM) DESIGNATED FLIGHT MODEL-1 (FM-1) D) THREE SETS OF THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM TEST EQUIPMENT (ESTE) E) TWO GLM EMULATORS (GLME) F) TWO FLIGHT SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTS (FSDES) G) ONE GROUND PROCESSING DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM (GPDS) H) SPARES FOR THE FOUR FMS I) ALL ADDITIONAL GLM MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (MGSE AND EGSE) CALLED OUT ELSEWHERE IN THIS DOCUMENT J) ALL ITEMS AND DOCUMENTS SPECIFIED IN ALL CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

Place of Performance

Location: PALO ALTO, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94304

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $486.2 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION for work described as: TAS::80 0110::TAS GEOSTATIONARY LIGHTNING MAPPER (GLM) INSTRUMENT THE FOR GEOSTATIONARY OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITES (GOES) R. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE PERSONNEL, MATERIALS, FACILITIES AND OTHER RESOURCES TO DESIGN, DEVELOP, DELIVER (TO THE DESIGNATED DESTINATION… Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in advanced weather monitoring technology. 2. Long contract duration suggests a need for sustained support and potential future enhancements. 3. The award is for a complex instrument with multiple flight models and extensive support equipment. 4. Competition dynamics will be analyzed to assess pricing and value for taxpayer dollars. 5. Risk indicators will be evaluated based on the complexity of the technology and development phase. 6. Performance context will be established by comparing to similar satellite instrument contracts. 7. Sector positioning highlights NASA's role in cutting-edge environmental monitoring. 8. The contract's cost-plus-award-fee structure incentivizes performance and cost control.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total contract value of $486.2 million over an 11,517-day period (approximately 31.5 years) indicates a substantial investment. While specific cost breakdowns for individual components are not provided, the cost-plus-award-fee (CPAF) structure suggests that the contractor, Lockheed Martin Corporation, will be reimbursed for allowable costs plus an award fee based on performance. Benchmarking this against similar complex satellite instrument development contracts is challenging without more granular cost data, but the extended period of performance implies a need for long-term sustainment and potential upgrades, which can influence overall value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The specific number of bidders is not detailed in the provided data, but full and open competition generally fosters a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and innovation. The use of a CPAF contract type suggests that performance metrics were critical in the evaluation, and the award fee component would have been determined based on how well Lockheed Martin met or exceeded these predefined objectives.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining competitive pricing and high-quality services through a robust bidding process.

Public Impact

The Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) instrument will enhance weather forecasting capabilities by providing continuous, high-resolution lightning data from geostationary orbit. This technology benefits meteorologists, emergency responders, and the public by improving severe weather prediction and understanding of atmospheric phenomena. The geographic impact is global, as data from geostationary satellites covers a wide area, providing crucial information for weather patterns across continents and oceans. The development and production of the GLM instrument and its components will likely involve a skilled workforce in aerospace engineering, manufacturing, and related technical fields. The contract supports NASA's GOES program, contributing to a critical component of the nation's weather observation infrastructure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

• The extended contract duration (over 31 years) raises concerns about potential cost overruns and the need for rigorous oversight to manage evolving technological requirements and inflation.
• The complexity of developing and delivering four flight models and extensive support equipment introduces inherent technical risks that could impact schedule and budget.
• The cost-plus-award-fee structure, while incentivizing performance, requires careful monitoring of allowable costs and objective assessment of award fee criteria to ensure fair value.
• Long-term sustainment requirements over such a long period may necessitate significant future funding, the scope of which might be difficult to predict accurately at the outset.

Positive Signals

• The award to Lockheed Martin Corporation, a major aerospace contractor, suggests a high level of confidence in their technical capabilities and experience with complex space systems.
• Full and open competition indicates a robust procurement process that likely yielded a technically sound and competitively priced proposal.
• The CPAF contract type, when managed effectively, can drive contractor performance and innovation by linking a portion of the profit to achieving specific objectives.
• The development of advanced lightning detection technology is a positive step for improving weather forecasting and understanding of atmospheric dynamics.
• The long contract period suggests a strategic commitment by NASA to a critical scientific mission, ensuring continuity of essential data.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on the development and production of sophisticated scientific instruments for space-based applications. The market for such specialized components is characterized by high barriers to entry due to technical expertise, stringent quality requirements, and significant R&D investment. NASA's spending on satellite instruments like the GLM is part of a broader trend in government investment in Earth observation and climate monitoring, which is crucial for understanding environmental changes and improving weather prediction. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other large satellite payload development contracts, often in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions or subcontracting requirements for this contract. As a large, complex development contract awarded to a major prime contractor, the primary focus is on the prime's ability to deliver the required technology. However, it is common practice for large prime contractors to utilize small businesses for specialized components or services, and the extent of small business participation would typically be outlined in the subcontracting plan, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by NASA's contracting officers and program management teams, who are responsible for monitoring contractor performance, approving costs, and ensuring compliance with contract terms. The cost-plus-award-fee structure necessitates detailed oversight of incurred costs and objective evaluation of performance against established criteria to determine award fees. Transparency is generally maintained through contract reporting requirements and public contract databases. While specific Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction is not explicitly stated, NASA's Office of Inspector General typically has oversight authority over NASA contracts to investigate fraud, waste, and abuse.

Related Government Programs

• Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) Program
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Weather Satellites
• Space-based Earth Observation Systems
• Atmospheric Science Research Programs
• Satellite Instrument Development Contracts

Risk Flags

• Long contract duration may lead to cost escalation and scope creep.
• Complexity of technology introduces significant development and integration risks.
• Reliance on a single contractor for over three decades requires robust oversight.
• Potential for technological obsolescence over the extended contract period.

Tags

nasa, space-instrumentation, weather-forecasting, geostationary-satellite, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-award-fee, aerospace, engineering-services, california, definitive-contract, long-term-support, environmental-monitoring

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $486.2 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. TAS::80 0110::TAS GEOSTATIONARY LIGHTNING MAPPER (GLM) INSTRUMENT THE FOR GEOSTATIONARY OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITES (GOES) R. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE PERSONNEL, MATERIALS, FACILITIES AND OTHER RESOURCES TO DESIGN, DEVELOP, DELIVER (TO THE DESIGNATED DESTINATION) AND SUPPORT UNDER THE BASIC CONTRACT: A) PARTS AND MATERIALS FOR AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT UNIT (EDU) AND 4 FLIGHT MODELS B) ONE GLM ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT UNIT (EDU) C) ONE GLM PROTO-FLIGHT MODEL (PFM) DESIGNATED FL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $486.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-12-13. End: 2039-06-25.

What is the historical spending pattern for the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) instrument program prior to this award?

The provided data focuses on a single, large definitive contract awarded in 2007 with a long period of performance extending to 2039. It does not offer historical spending details for the GLM program before this award. This contract appears to encompass the primary development and production phase, along with long-term support. To understand historical spending, one would need to examine earlier contract actions, research and development funding allocations, or potential predecessor contracts related to the GLM's conceptualization and initial design phases. Without access to NASA's detailed procurement history for the GOES program and specifically the GLM instrument, a comprehensive historical spending analysis is not possible based solely on this contract's data.

How does the cost-plus-award-fee (CPAF) structure influence contractor performance and cost control for this contract?

The Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) structure is designed to incentivize contractor performance by reimbursing allowable costs plus an additional fee that is contingent upon meeting or exceeding specific performance objectives. For the GLM instrument contract, this means Lockheed Martin Corporation is covered for its expenses but earns a higher fee if it demonstrates superior performance in areas such as technical execution, schedule adherence, and potentially cost management beyond baseline targets. This structure encourages the contractor to go beyond minimum requirements to achieve award fee criteria, fostering innovation and quality. However, it also requires robust government oversight to ensure that performance metrics are clearly defined, objectively measured, and that the award fee decisions are fair and justifiable, preventing potential manipulation or inflated claims for higher fees.

What are the key technical risks associated with developing and delivering the GLM instrument and its associated components?

Developing and delivering the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) instrument, including one Engineering Development Unit (EDU), one Proto-Flight Model (PFM), and four Flight Models (FMs), along with associated test equipment and software environments, presents several significant technical risks. These include the inherent complexity of designing and building advanced space-qualified sensors capable of high-frequency lightning detection from geostationary orbit. Risks involve ensuring the reliability and longevity of components over an extended mission life (potentially decades), managing the integration of complex subsystems, and achieving stringent performance specifications for data accuracy and coverage. Furthermore, the development of specialized test equipment (ESTE) and flight software (FSDES) introduces risks related to compatibility, functionality, and validation. Ensuring the successful transition from development units to flight-ready hardware and software, especially across multiple flight models, requires meticulous engineering, rigorous testing, and effective risk mitigation strategies throughout the program lifecycle.

What is the expected impact of the GLM instrument on weather forecasting accuracy and severe storm prediction?

The Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) instrument is expected to significantly enhance weather forecasting accuracy, particularly concerning severe storm prediction. By providing continuous, full-disk observations of lightning activity from geostationary orbit, the GLM will offer unprecedented insight into the development and intensity of thunderstorms. Lightning is a key indicator of storm updraft strength and potential for severe weather phenomena such as hail, high winds, and tornadoes. The GLM's data will allow meteorologists to detect rapid increases in lightning flash rates, which often precede severe weather outbreaks. This real-time, high-resolution data will enable earlier warnings, more precise tracking of storm evolution, and improved understanding of the complex processes within thunderstorms, ultimately leading to better preparedness and public safety.

How does the contract's duration of over 31 years compare to typical satellite instrument development contracts?

A contract duration of over 31 years (from award in 2007 to estimated completion in 2039) for a satellite instrument, encompassing development, delivery, and long-term support, is exceptionally long compared to typical satellite instrument development contracts. While the initial development and delivery phases of such instruments usually span several years (e.g., 3-7 years), contracts often include options for extended mission operations, sustainment, and data processing that can add many more years. However, a single definitive contract covering such an extensive period, including the bulk of the development and a significant operational support phase, is unusual. This extended duration likely reflects a strategic decision by NASA to ensure long-term continuity for a critical scientific capability within the GOES program, bundling initial development with a substantial portion of its operational life to streamline management and potentially secure long-term funding commitments.

What is the role of Lockheed Martin Corporation in the development and delivery of the GLM instrument?

Lockheed Martin Corporation, as the prime contractor for this definitive contract, holds the primary responsibility for the design, development, delivery, and support of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) instrument and its associated components. This includes providing all necessary personnel, materials, facilities, and resources. Their scope of work encompasses the creation of an Engineering Development Unit (EDU), a Proto-Flight Model (PFM), and four Flight Models (FMs) of the GLM instrument. Additionally, Lockheed Martin is tasked with developing and providing critical support elements such as electrical system test equipment (ESTE), GLM emulators (GLME), flight software development environments (FSDES), a ground processing demonstration system (GPDS), and spares for the flight models. The contract's Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) structure indicates that their performance in executing these tasks will be evaluated, with potential for additional award fees based on achieving predefined objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: INSTRUMENTS AND LABORATORY EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: NNG07184919R

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3251 HANOVER ST BLDG 201, PALO ALTO, CA, 94304

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $509,533,193

Exercised Options: $509,533,193

Current Obligation: $486,224,471

Actual Outlays: $43,027,791

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-12-13

Current End Date: 2039-06-25

Potential End Date: 2039-06-25 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-16

More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Corporation

• Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Department of Defense)
• 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Department of Defense)
• THE Purpose of This Modification IS to Award F-35A Lrip 15 Usaf Aircraft* Long Lead Funding — $30.1B (Department of Defense)
• THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Award Long Lead Funding for F-35A, F-35B, and F-35C Aircraft for U.S. Services, Non-Dod Partners, and FMS Customers — $24.5B (Department of Defense)
• Lrip 11 AAC — $12.3B (Department of Defense)

View all Lockheed Martin Corporation federal contracts →

Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts

• International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
• TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
• Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
• Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
• Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)

View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending