NASA's $25.5M Facilities Support Contract Awarded to Information Network Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $25,550,204 ($25.6M)
Contractor: Information Network Inc
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2004-02-02
End Date: 2009-01-31
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: GREENBELT, PRINCE GEORGE'S County, MARYLAND, 20771
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $25.6 million to INFORMATION NETWORK INC for work described as: TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $25.5M over 5 years. 2. Awarded via Full and Open Competition. 3. Potential risk in cost-plus award fee structure. 4. Facilities Support Services sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract is a Cost Plus Award Fee type, which can lead to higher costs if not managed effectively. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the cost-plus award fee structure might incentivize contractors to incur costs to achieve award fees, potentially impacting price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for facilities support services. The cost-plus award fee structure requires careful oversight to ensure value for money and prevent unnecessary expenditures.
Public Impact
Ensures operational continuity for NASA facilities. Supports critical infrastructure maintenance and services. Potential for cost overruns due to award fee structure.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure
- Lack of detailed cost data for benchmarking
Positive Signals
- Full and Open Competition
- Long-term contract providing stability
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category encompassing maintenance, operations, and management of physical infrastructure. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on the scale and complexity of the facilities supported.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The Cost Plus Award Fee structure necessitates robust oversight from NASA to ensure performance targets are met and costs are controlled. Regular performance reviews and audits are crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to fee structure
- Lack of transparency in cost breakdown
- Dependence on contractor performance for award fee
- Limited insight into small business participation
Tags
facilities-support-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, md, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $25.6 million to INFORMATION NETWORK INC. TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INFORMATION NETWORK INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $25.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-02-02. End: 2009-01-31.
What specific performance metrics are tied to the award fee, and how are they measured?
The award fee is typically tied to predefined performance metrics outlined in the contract. These could include factors like response times for maintenance requests, quality of service delivery, cost control, and adherence to safety standards. NASA's contracting officers would be responsible for evaluating the contractor's performance against these metrics and determining the appropriate award fee.
How does the cost-plus award fee structure compare to fixed-price contracts for similar services in terms of overall cost and risk to the government?
Cost-plus award fee contracts offer flexibility and can be suitable for services where costs are uncertain. However, they carry a higher risk of cost overruns compared to fixed-price contracts. The government bears more cost risk, but the award fee mechanism aims to incentivize contractor performance and efficiency, potentially leading to better outcomes if managed well.
What is the historical performance of Information Network Inc. on government contracts, particularly those with similar fee structures?
Assessing Information Network Inc.'s historical performance is crucial. Reviewing past contract performance evaluations, any past performance issues or commendations, and their track record with cost-plus award fee contracts would provide insight into their reliability and ability to manage costs effectively while meeting performance objectives.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: RFP5-01915-GET
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 10210 GREENBELT ROAD, SUITE 300, LANHAM, MD, 04
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $25,550,204
Exercised Options: $25,550,204
Current Obligation: $25,550,204
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-02-02
Current End Date: 2009-01-31
Potential End Date: 2009-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-04-29
More Contracts from Information Network Inc
- Financial Services Contract — $18.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →