NASA awards $37.9M to Lockheed Martin for Computer Systems Design Services under Master Contract NAS5-98145
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $37,921,779 ($37.9M)
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2004-03-31
End Date: 2007-04-01
Contract Duration: 1,096 days
Daily Burn Rate: $34.6K/day
Competition Type: FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: ODIN GRC DELIVERY ORDER TO MASTER CONTRACT NAS5-98145
Place of Performance
Location: LANHAM, PRINCE GEORGE'S County, MARYLAND, 20706
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $37.9 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION for work described as: ODIN GRC DELIVERY ORDER TO MASTER CONTRACT NAS5-98145 Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a large, established defense contractor. 2. The contract is a follow-on to a competed action, suggesting prior competition. 3. The service category is Computer Systems Design Services, a common IT procurement area. 4. The contract duration is over three years, indicating a significant project. 5. The firm fixed-price contract type aims to control costs.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $37.9M over three years appears reasonable for complex computer systems design services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT contracts would provide a more precise assessment of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
While noted as a 'FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION', the specific competition method for this delivery order is not detailed. The impact on price discovery depends on whether the original master contract competition was robust and if this delivery order was also competed or awarded under its terms.
Taxpayer Impact: The firm fixed-price contract type is designed to provide cost certainty for taxpayers. The value of the contract suggests a significant investment of public funds.
Public Impact
Supports NASA's mission-critical IT infrastructure and systems. Ensures continued development and maintenance of complex computer systems. Impacts the technological capabilities of a leading space agency. Potential for job creation within the IT sector supporting this contract.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific competition details for this delivery order.
- Potential for vendor lock-in if the master contract limits future competition.
- The 'br' (bid range?) value of 34600 is unclear and could indicate a wide bid spread if it represents a bid amount.
Positive Signals
- Follow-on to a competed action suggests a history of competition.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type offers cost predictability.
- Awarded to a reputable large contractor with proven capabilities.
- Long-term duration allows for sustained project development.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically computer systems design. Spending in this area is crucial for government modernization and operational efficiency. Benchmarks for similar IT services contracts vary widely based on complexity and duration.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to Lockheed Martin Corporation, a large business. There is no indication that small businesses were involved as prime contractors or significant subcontractors in this specific delivery order.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract is managed by NASA, a federal agency with established oversight mechanisms. The 'FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION' suggests that the initial award underwent a competitive process, implying some level of oversight. Further review of contract performance reports would be needed for a full oversight assessment.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Systems Design Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed competition information for the delivery order.
- Potential for limited price competition if awarded sole-source under the master contract.
- Unclear meaning of the 'br' value.
- No performance data provided to assess effectiveness.
- Contractor is a large business, potentially limiting small business participation.
Tags
computer-systems-design-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, md, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $37.9 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ODIN GRC DELIVERY ORDER TO MASTER CONTRACT NAS5-98145
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $37.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-03-31. End: 2007-04-01.
What was the specific competition method used for this delivery order, and how did it impact price discovery compared to the original master contract?
The data states 'FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION' but does not specify the method for this particular delivery order. If it was a sole-source award under the master contract, price discovery might be less robust than if it were competed. Understanding the original master contract's competition and the terms under which this delivery order was issued is crucial for assessing price reasonableness and taxpayer value.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how has Lockheed Martin performed against them?
The provided data does not include specific KPIs or performance metrics for this contract. Assessing Lockheed Martin's performance would require access to contract performance reports, quality assurance reviews, and any documented issues or successes. Without this information, it's difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the contractor's service delivery and the overall value realized by NASA.
How does the per-unit cost or overall contract value compare to industry benchmarks for similar computer systems design services provided to other federal agencies or large organizations?
A direct per-unit cost benchmark is not available without more granular data on the services provided. However, the total contract value of $37.9 million over approximately three years for complex computer systems design services awarded to a major contractor like Lockheed Martin is within a plausible range for large-scale government IT projects. A detailed comparison would necessitate analyzing the scope of work against similar contracts.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)
Address: 700 N FREDERICK AVE LOC B, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Federally Funded Research and Development Corp, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $47,186,725
Exercised Options: $47,186,725
Current Obligation: $37,921,779
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NAS598145
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-03-31
Current End Date: 2007-04-01
Potential End Date: 2007-04-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-03-18
More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Modification IS to Award F-35A Lrip 15 Usaf Aircraft* Long Lead Funding — $30.1B (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Award Long Lead Funding for F-35A, F-35B, and F-35C Aircraft for U.S. Services, Non-Dod Partners, and FMS Customers — $24.5B (Department of Defense)
- Lrip 11 AAC — $12.3B (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →