NASA's $19.2M Environmental Consulting Contract Awarded to Raytheon Company
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,199,415 ($19.2M)
Contractor: Raytheon Company
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2004-11-02
End Date: 2009-05-30
Contract Duration: 1,670 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.5K/day
Competition Type: FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ACES
Place of Performance
Location: MARLBOROUGH, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01752
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $19.2 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: ACES Key points: 1. Contract Value: $19.2 million over 5.5 years. 2. Competition: Follow-on to a competed action, suggesting prior competition. 3. Risk: Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure can incentivize cost overruns. 4. Sector: Environmental Consulting Services (NAICS 541620).
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract is a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) type, which can lead to higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar environmental consulting services contracts is needed for a precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
The contract is a 'FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION,' indicating that the original contract was competed. However, the specific competition method for this follow-on action is not detailed, impacting price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The total taxpayer impact is the full $19.2 million awarded, with potential for increased costs due to the CPAF structure.
Public Impact
Environmental consulting services are crucial for NASA's operations and compliance. The long duration of the contract (over 5 years) suggests a need for sustained support. The award to a large contractor like Raytheon Company may limit opportunities for smaller, specialized firms.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure
- Lack of detailed competition method for follow-on action
Positive Signals
- Follow-on to a competed action
- Established contractor with relevant experience
Sector Analysis
Environmental consulting services are essential for regulatory compliance and operational sustainability across government agencies. Benchmarks for similar services vary widely based on scope and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved in this specific follow-on action, though the prime contractor is a large corporation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would focus on ensuring Raytheon meets performance objectives to earn award fees and manages costs effectively under the CPAF structure.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Consulting Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure
- Potential for cost overruns
- Limited transparency on follow-on competition method
- Lack of small business participation data
Tags
environmental-consulting-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ma, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $19.2 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. ACES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-11-02. End: 2009-05-30.
What was the competitive landscape for the original competed action, and how did that influence the pricing for this follow-on?
Understanding the original competition is key to assessing if the follow-on pricing reflects a fair market value. If the original competition was robust, it likely drove competitive pricing. However, without details on the follow-on competition method, it's difficult to determine if the current pricing is optimal or if there's potential for cost savings through further competition or negotiation.
How effectively has Raytheon managed costs and performance on previous environmental consulting contracts with NASA or similar agencies under CPAF arrangements?
Assessing Raytheon's past performance under CPAF contracts is crucial for evaluating the risk associated with this award. Strong historical cost control and performance metrics would indicate a lower risk of cost overruns and a higher likelihood of achieving desired outcomes. Conversely, a history of cost overruns or missed performance targets would raise concerns about the effectiveness and value of this contract.
What specific environmental consulting services are included, and how do they align with NASA's current and future mission needs?
The value and effectiveness of this contract hinge on the alignment of the consulting services with NASA's specific requirements. A clear understanding of the scope of work, including areas like environmental impact assessments, compliance monitoring, and remediation strategies, is necessary. Ensuring these services directly support NASA's operational and strategic goals maximizes the return on investment and ensures critical environmental responsibilities are met.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Space R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FOLLOW ON TO COMPETED ACTION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1001 BOSTON POST RD E, MARLBOROUGH, MA, 03
Business Categories: Category Business, Emerging Small Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,982,352
Exercised Options: $19,982,352
Current Obligation: $19,199,415
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-11-02
Current End Date: 2009-05-30
Potential End Date: 2009-05-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-08-22
More Contracts from Raytheon Company
- Federal Contract — $5.7B (Department of Defense)
- TEN Fire Units for Qatar — $5.6B (Department of Defense)
- GPS Advanced Control Segment (OCX) Phase B Blocks 1 and 2 — $4.5B (Department of Defense)
- An/Spy-6(v) Hardware Production — $3.3B (Department of Defense)
- Predominant - Patriot UAE — $3.0B (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →