NASA awards $30.8M for UAV-SAR R&D to California Institute of Technology, a sole-source contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,775,427 ($30.8M)

Contractor: California Institute of Technology

Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Start Date: 2004-08-04

End Date: 2009-01-31

Contract Duration: 1,641 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: UAV-SAR

Place of Performance

Location: PASADENA, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 91125

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $30.8 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY for work described as: UAV-SAR Key points: 1. Significant investment in advanced UAV-SAR technology development. 2. Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and innovation. 3. High R&D spending in a specialized scientific sector. 4. Potential for long-term technological advancements.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's Cost Plus Award Fee structure can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. Benchmarking is difficult without comparable sole-source contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a potential lack of market research or a belief that only one entity could perform the work. This limits price discovery and may result in a higher cost to the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competition, with funds directed to a single provider without market validation.

Public Impact

Advancement in drone-based synthetic aperture radar technology. Potential applications in Earth science, disaster monitoring, and defense. Investment in cutting-edge research capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Cost-plus contract type
  • Sole-source award

Positive Signals

  • Supports critical R&D
  • Partnership with a leading research institution

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical and engineering sciences. Spending benchmarks for specialized UAV-SAR R&D are difficult to establish due to its niche nature, but $30.8M represents a substantial investment.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to the California Institute of Technology, a large research institution. There is no indication of small business participation in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants close oversight to ensure the cost-plus award fee structure is managed effectively and that the research objectives are met efficiently.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award lacks competition.
  • Cost-plus contract type can lead to cost overruns.
  • Potential for limited price discovery.
  • Lack of transparency in award fee determination without detailed metrics.

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ca, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $30.8 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. UAV-SAR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-08-04. End: 2009-01-31.

What was the justification for the sole-source award, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, critical urgency, or a lack of viable alternatives. For this UAV-SAR contract, NASA likely assessed that the California Institute of Technology possessed specialized expertise or proprietary technology essential for the project. Further investigation into the specific justification documentation would clarify whether other competitive avenues were explored and why they were deemed unsuitable.

How is the 'award fee' component structured, and what metrics are used to determine its payout to ensure value for money?

The 'award fee' component in a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract is designed to incentivize contractor performance beyond basic requirements. NASA would have established specific performance criteria, such as technical milestones, schedule adherence, and innovation. The agency then evaluates the contractor's performance against these metrics to determine the amount of award fee paid. Clear, objective metrics are crucial to ensure this fee drives desired outcomes and represents good value.

What are the long-term implications of this sole-source R&D investment on broader market competition and technological diffusion?

Sole-source R&D investments can concentrate expertise and potentially lead to significant technological breakthroughs. However, they may also stifle broader market competition by limiting other entities' access to foundational research or development opportunities. The long-term impact depends on how NASA manages intellectual property and encourages knowledge sharing post-award to foster wider technological adoption and future competitive efforts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTSpace R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4800 OAK GROVE DR, PASADENA, CA, 91109

Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,860,300

Exercised Options: $30,860,300

Current Obligation: $30,775,427

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NAS703001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-08-04

Current End Date: 2009-01-31

Potential End Date: 2009-01-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-02-18

More Contracts from California Institute of Technology

View all California Institute of Technology federal contracts →

Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts

View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending