NASA's $14.3M R&D Contract with Caltech: Long Duration, No Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,325,661 ($14.3M)

Contractor: California Institute of Technology

Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Start Date: 2003-09-30

End Date: 2013-03-31

Contract Duration: 3,470 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 51

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: OFC OF CHIEF ENGINEER

Place of Performance

Location: PASADENA, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 91125

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $14.3 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY for work described as: OFC OF CHIEF ENGINEER Key points: 1. Significant long-term investment in R&D at $14.3M. 2. Sole-source award to a single academic institution raises competition concerns. 3. Potential for cost overruns given the Cost Plus Award Fee structure. 4. Focus on physical, engineering, and life sciences R&D.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The Cost Plus Award Fee structure can incentivize performance but may lead to higher costs than fixed-price contracts. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the pricing is optimal.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, awarded solely to the California Institute of Technology. This lack of competition limits price discovery and may result in a higher overall cost to the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition could mean taxpayers are not receiving the best possible value for the $14.3 million spent on research and development.

Public Impact

Research advancements in physical, engineering, and life sciences could have long-term societal benefits. Sole-source awards can sometimes be justified for highly specialized research, but transparency is key. The extended duration (2003-2013) suggests a sustained research effort.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Cost Plus Award Fee structure
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Award to a reputable research institution
  • Focus on critical R&D areas

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (NAICS 541710). Spending in this sector is crucial for innovation but can be complex to manage due to the inherent uncertainties in research outcomes.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded to a large academic institution and does not appear to involve small business participation. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The long duration and sole-source nature of this contract warrant close oversight to ensure funds are used effectively and research objectives are met. Regular performance reviews are essential.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competitive bidding
  • Potential for cost creep due to CPAF
  • Extended contract duration without clear interim milestones
  • No apparent small business participation

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ca, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $14.3 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. OFC OF CHIEF ENGINEER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-09-30. End: 2013-03-31.

What specific research outcomes were achieved during the contract's 10-year period, and how do they align with NASA's strategic goals?

The contract focused on research and development in physical, engineering, and life sciences. While specific outcomes are not detailed, such long-term R&D efforts typically aim to advance scientific understanding, develop new technologies, and support NASA's broader mission objectives, potentially leading to breakthroughs in areas like materials science, propulsion, or biomedical research for space exploration.

Given the sole-source award and Cost Plus structure, what mechanisms were in place to mitigate the risk of cost overruns and ensure fair pricing?

The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure includes award fees tied to performance, intended to incentivize efficiency. However, without competition, robust oversight, including detailed cost audits and regular performance evaluations against pre-defined metrics, would be critical to ensure fair pricing and prevent unnecessary cost escalation.

How was the selection of the California Institute of Technology justified as the sole source for this critical R&D work?

Sole-source awards are typically justified when a specific entity possesses unique capabilities, expertise, or resources essential for the contract's requirements that cannot be replicated by other sources. For specialized scientific research, Caltech's established reputation and specific research infrastructure in physical, engineering, and life sciences likely formed the basis for this justification.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTSpace R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 51

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4800 OAK GROVE DR, PASADENA, CA, 28

Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,298,000

Exercised Options: $15,298,000

Current Obligation: $14,325,661

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NAS703001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-09-30

Current End Date: 2013-03-31

Potential End Date: 2013-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-11-08

More Contracts from California Institute of Technology

View all California Institute of Technology federal contracts →

Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts

View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending