NASA's Mars Exploration Rover contract awarded to Caltech for $227M, spanning 9 years
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $227,143,609 ($227.1M)
Contractor: California Institute of Technology
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2003-09-24
End Date: 2012-09-30
Contract Duration: 3,294 days
Daily Burn Rate: $69.0K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 51
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: MARS EXPLORATION ROVER
Place of Performance
Location: PASADENA, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 91125
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $227.1 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY for work described as: MARS EXPLORATION ROVER Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in planetary science research. 2. Sole-source award suggests unique capabilities or established expertise of the contractor. 3. Long duration indicates a complex, multi-phase project with sustained research objectives. 4. Performance context likely involves extensive data collection and analysis from Mars missions. 5. Sector positioning places this contract within NASA's core space exploration and scientific endeavors. 6. The contract's cost-plus award fee structure incentivizes performance while managing uncertainty.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
Benchmarking the value of this specific contract is challenging due to its unique nature as a large-scale, long-term scientific research project for planetary exploration. However, the total award of $227 million over nine years, averaging approximately $25 million annually, appears reasonable for a mission of this complexity and duration, considering the specialized personnel, equipment, and operational costs involved. The cost-plus award fee structure allows for flexibility in managing research costs while providing incentives for achieving project milestones.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating that NASA identified the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) as the only entity possessing the necessary specialized knowledge, facilities, or capabilities to perform the research and development for the Mars Exploration Rover mission. Sole-source awards typically occur when a unique product or service is required, or when a specific contractor has a proven track record and indispensable expertise for a particular project.
Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can limit opportunities for competitive bidding, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers if alternative, more cost-effective solutions were available through open competition.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the scientific community and the public, through advancements in our understanding of Mars. Services delivered include the design, development, operation, and scientific analysis of data from the Mars Exploration Rovers. Geographic impact is global, with data contributing to international scientific understanding and space exploration efforts. Workforce implications include employment for scientists, engineers, technicians, and support staff at Caltech and its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in long-term, complex R&D projects.
- Risk associated with reliance on a single contractor for critical mission objectives.
- Challenges in ensuring continued innovation and cost-efficiency over an extended contract period.
Positive Signals
- Contractor's established expertise in space science and rover technology.
- Successful track record of Caltech in managing complex scientific missions.
- Cost-plus award fee structure incentivizes performance and achievement of mission goals.
- Long-term nature of the contract allows for sustained focus and development.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development (R&D) sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences related to space exploration. The aerospace R&D market is characterized by high technological complexity, significant government investment, and a limited number of highly specialized contractors. NASA's spending on planetary science missions like the Mars Exploration Rover is a key component of this sector, driving innovation and scientific discovery.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements explicitly mentioned for this sole-source award. As a sole-source contract awarded to a large research institution, the direct impact on small businesses may be limited unless Caltech actively engages them as subcontractors for specific components or services.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily be managed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), which operates under Caltech's management. NASA's internal oversight mechanisms, including program reviews, milestone tracking, and financial audits, would be in place to ensure accountability and adherence to contract terms. The cost-plus award fee structure also provides a performance-based oversight component.
Related Government Programs
- Mars Science Laboratory (Curiosity Rover)
- Mars 2020 (Perseverance Rover)
- Outer Planets Missions
- Hubble Space Telescope Operations
- James Webb Space Telescope Operations
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award may limit competitive pricing.
- Long contract duration increases risk of cost escalation.
- Complexity of R&D projects can lead to unforeseen challenges.
Tags
nasa, caltech, mars-exploration, research-and-development, space-exploration, sole-source, cost-plus-award-fee, planetary-science, california, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $227.1 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. MARS EXPLORATION ROVER
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $227.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-09-24. End: 2012-09-30.
What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis to the California Institute of Technology?
The specific justification for the sole-source award to the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) for the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) mission likely stemmed from Caltech's unique and indispensable expertise in planetary science, rover design, and mission operations, particularly through its Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). NASA often relies on JPL's established capabilities for complex robotic space missions due to their proven track record, specialized facilities, and highly skilled personnel. For missions as intricate and critical as exploring Mars, identifying a single entity with the comprehensive capabilities and institutional knowledge required to successfully execute the project from conception through operation is paramount. This ensures continuity, minimizes risks associated with technology transfer or contractor learning curves, and leverages existing infrastructure and intellectual property developed over years of prior space exploration endeavors.
How does the total contract value of $227 million compare to other large-scale NASA R&D projects?
The total contract value of $227 million for the Mars Exploration Rover mission, awarded over approximately nine years, places it within the range of significant, but not unprecedented, NASA R&D investments. For context, major NASA flagship missions, such as the Mars Science Laboratory (Curiosity rover) or the James Webb Space Telescope, have development and operational costs that can range from hundreds of millions to several billion dollars. Smaller-scale R&D contracts or individual instrument development projects would typically be valued much lower. The MER contract's value is substantial, reflecting the complexity, duration, and scientific ambition of exploring another planet, but it is not at the extreme upper end of NASA's most costly endeavors. Its value is more comparable to other multi-year robotic planetary science missions.
What are the primary risks associated with a long-duration, sole-source contract like this one?
A long-duration, sole-source contract like the Mars Exploration Rover mission carries several primary risks. Firstly, the lack of competition means there's a reduced incentive for the contractor to aggressively control costs or innovate beyond the contract's defined scope, potentially leading to cost overruns. Secondly, reliance on a single entity can create vulnerabilities; if the contractor faces financial difficulties, management issues, or key personnel departures, the entire project could be jeopardized. Thirdly, over an extended period, the contractor might become entrenched, making it difficult to introduce new technologies or approaches that could improve efficiency or scientific return. Finally, without competitive benchmarking, it can be harder to ensure the government is receiving optimal value for its investment throughout the contract's lifecycle.
How does the 'Cost Plus Award Fee' (CPAF) contract type influence project management and cost control?
The 'Cost Plus Award Fee' (CPAF) contract type is designed to balance cost control with performance incentives on complex projects where precise cost estimation is difficult. Under CPAF, the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred, plus a base fee that is a fixed percentage of the estimated cost. Crucially, there is also an 'award fee' component, which is earned based on the government's subjective evaluation of the contractor's performance against pre-defined criteria. This structure incentivizes the contractor to exceed minimum performance requirements to earn the award fee, while the government retains control over the amount of the award fee. It encourages proactive management and high-quality execution, but requires robust government oversight to objectively assess performance and determine the appropriate award fee, thus mitigating some risks of cost overruns inherent in cost-plus contracts.
What is the historical spending pattern for NASA's Mars exploration programs?
NASA's historical spending on Mars exploration programs demonstrates a consistent and significant commitment to understanding the Red Planet. This commitment has evolved over decades, with spending increasing as missions have become more ambitious and technologically complex. Early missions were relatively low-cost, but the advent of sophisticated orbiters, landers, and rovers has driven substantial budget allocations. Programs like the Mars Exploration Rovers (MER), Mars Science Laboratory (MSL), and Mars 2020 represent multi-year, multi-hundred-million-dollar investments. Overall, Mars exploration consistently ranks as a high-priority area within NASA's planetary science division, reflecting its scientific importance and public interest. Spending fluctuates based on mission lifecycles, with peaks during development and launch phases and sustained funding for operations and data analysis.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Space R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 51
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4800 OAK GROVE DR, PASADENA, CA, 91109
Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $235,994,700
Exercised Options: $235,994,700
Current Obligation: $227,143,609
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NAS703001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-09-24
Current End Date: 2012-09-30
Potential End Date: 2012-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-10-26
More Contracts from California Institute of Technology
- Europa Clipper Project the Contract IS the Sponsoring Agreement Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Nasa and the California Institute of Technology-Contractor, a Private Nonprofit Educational Institution, Which Establishes the Relationship for the Operation of the Federally Funded Research and Development Center-Ffrdc Known AS the JET Propulsion Laboratory. the Contractor, JPL, IS Required to Perform Work That IS Designated in Task Orders Issued by the Nasa Management Office-Nmo Contracting Officers. Nasa-Sponsored Work: Jpls Primary Mission IS to Support the Nasa Science Mission Directorate-Smd in Carrying OUT the Specific Objectives Identified in the SMD Science Plan. the Four Broad Scientific Areas ARE: Earth Science, Planetary Science, Heliophysics, and Astrophysics. in Performance of This Contract, JPL Shall: 1. Supply a Broad Base of Scientific and Technical Capabilities Relevant to Nasa Program and Project Responsibilities and Assignments. 2. Foster ITS Unique Relationship With a Top-Tier University to Facilitate the Involvement of Scientists, Engineers, and Students From the University and Research Communities in Nasa Mission and in Supporting Other Government Agencies. 3. Support Nasa in Enabling Program and Institutional Capabilities. 4. Develop Spacecraft and Instruments That ARE Sent to Various Destinations With OUR Solar System, Including Earth Orbit, Planets, Planetary Satellites, Asteroids, and Comets. These Missions MAY BE Orbiters, Landers, or Rovers, and Typically Include Cutting-Edge Technologies Required to Meet Scientific Requirements. 5. Perform Project Tasks Involving: I-Autonomous Deep-Space, Inner-Space and Earth-Orbiting Spacecraft or Major Subsystems, Ii-Experiments, Instruments, or Other Devices Which MAY BE Carried AS Payload on Spacecrafts in Missions Managed by Others, And-Or Iii-Ground-Based Systems. 6. Beyond ITS Primary Mission, JPL MAY Perform Work for Other Nasa Mission Directorates or Offices. 7. JPL IS Also Responsible for the Operation, Research, Technology Insertion, and Management of Nasas Deep Space Network to Provide Telecommunication and Operation Services, Including Data Acquisition and Data Delivery Required to Meet Established Agency Objectives. 8. JPL IS Also Required to Maintain and Conduct an Education Program in Close Coordination With the Nasa Headquarters Education Office, the Academic Community AT Large, and in Support to Nasa Strategic Objectives to Improve Student Retention in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics-Stem Disciplines. Work for Non-Nasa Sponsors: JPL MAY Perform Work for Non-Nasa Sponsors. This Work Will BE Designated in Task Orders Issued by NMO Contracting Officers Based on Task Plans Initiated by the Contractor — $2.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Mars Science Laboratory — $1.7B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Mars Sample Return (MSR) Program - Phase a 40-108270 — $1.6B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Deep Space Network (DSN) the Contract IS the Sponsoring Agreement Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) and the California Institute of Technology (contractor), a Private Nonprofit Educational Institution, Which Establishes the Relationship for the Operation of the Federally Funded Research and Development Center (ffrdc) Known AS the JET Propulsion Laboratory. the Contractor, JPL, IS Required to Perform Work That IS Designated in Task Orders Issued by the Nasa Management Office (NMO) Contracting Officers. Nasa - Sponsored Work: Jpl's Primary Mission IS to Support the Nasa Science Mission Directorate (SMD) in Carrying OUT the Specific Objectives Identified in the SMD Science Plan. the Four Broad Scientific Areas ARE: Earth Science, Planetary Science, Heliophysics, and Astrophysics. in Performance of This Contract, JPL Shall: 1) Supply a Broad Base of Scientific and Technical Capabilities Relevant to Nasa Program and Project Responsibilities and Assignments. 2) Foster ITS Unique Relationship With a Top-Tier University to Facilitate the Involvement of Scientists, Engineers, and Students From the University and Research Communities in Nasa Mission and in Supporting Other Government Agencies. 3) Support Nasa in Enabling Program and Institutional Capabilities. 4) Develop Spacecraft and Instruments That ARE Sent to Various Destinations With OUR Solar System, Including Earth Orbit, Planets, Planetary Satellites, Asteroids, and Comets. These Missions MAY BE Orbiters, Landers, or Rovers, and Typically Include Cutting-Edge Technologies Required to Meet Scientific Requirements. 5) Perform Project Tasks Involving: (I) Autonomous Deep-Space, Inner-Space and Earth-Orbiting Spacecraft or Major Subsystems, (II) Experiments, Instruments, or Other Devices Which MAY BE Carried AS Payload on Spacecrafts in Missions Managed by Others, And/Or (III) Ground-Based Systems. 6) Beyond ITS Primary Mission, JPL MAY Perform Work for Other Nasa Mission Directorates or Offices. 7) JPL IS Also Responsible for the Operation, Research, Technology Insertion, and Management of Nasa S Deep Space Network to Provide Telecommunication and Operation Services, Including Data Acquisition and Data Delivery Required to Meet Established Agency Objectives. 8) JPL IS Also Required to Maintain and Conduct an Education Program in Close Coordination With the Nasa Headquarters Education Office, the Academic Community AT Large, and in Support to Nasa Strategic Objectives to Improve Student Retention in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (stem) Disciplines. Work for Non-Nasa Sponsors: JPL MAY Perform Work for Non-Nasa Sponsors. This Work Will BE Designated in Task Orders Issued by NMO Contracting Officers Based on Task Plans Initiated by the Contractor — $1.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 2020 Mars Science Rover Project - Phase a the Contract IS the Sponsoring Agreement Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) and the California Institute of Technology (contractor), a Private Nonprofit Educational Institution, Which Establishes the Relationship for the Operation of the Federally Funded Research and Development Center (ffrdc) Known AS the JET Propulsion Laboratory. the Contractor, JPL, IS Required to Perform Work That IS Designated in Task Orders Issued by the Nasa Management Office (NMO) Contracting Officers. Nasa - Sponsored Work: Jpl's Primary Mission IS to Support the Nasa Science Mission Directorate (SMD) in Carrying OUT the Specific Objectives Identified in the SMD Science Plan. the Four Broad Scientific Areas ARE: Earth Science, Planetary Science, Heliophysics, and Astrophysics. in Performance of This Contract, JPL Shall: 1) Supply a Broad Base of Scientific and Technical Capabilities Relevant to Nasa Program and Project Responsibilities and Assignments. 2) Foster ITS Unique Relationship With a Top-Tier University to Facilitate the Involvement of Scientists, Engineers, and Students From the University and Research Communities in Nasa Mission and in Supporting Other Government Agencies. 3) Support Nasa in Enabling Program and Institutional Capabilities. 4) Develop Spacecraft and Instruments That ARE Sent to Various Destinations With OUR Solar System, Including Earth Orbit, Planets, Planetary Satellites, Asteroids, and Comets. These Missions MAY BE Orbiters, Landers, or Rovers, and Typically Include Cutting-Edge Technologies Required to Meet Scientific Requirements. 5) Perform Project Tasks Involving: (I) Autonomous Deep-Space, Inner-Space and Earth-Orbiting Spacecraft or Major Subsystems, (II) Experiments, Instruments, or Other Devices Which MAY BE Carried AS Payload on Spacecrafts in Missions Managed by Others, And/Or (III) Ground-Based Systems. 6) Beyond ITS Primary Mission, JPL MAY Perform Work for Other Nasa Mission Directorates or Offices. 7) JPL IS Also Responsible for the Operation, Research, Technology Insertion, and Management of Nasa S Deep Space Network to Provide Telecommunication and Operation Services, Including Data Acquisition and Data Delivery Required to Meet Established Agency Objectives. 8) JPL IS Also Required to Maintain and Conduct an Education Program in Close Coordination With the Nasa Headquarters Education Office, the Academic Community AT Large, and in Support to Nasa Strategic Objectives to Improve Student Retention in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (stem) Disciplines. Work for Non-Nasa Sponsors: JPL MAY Perform Work for Non-Nasa Sponsors. This Work Will BE Designated in Task Orders Issued by NMO Contracting Officers Based on Task Plans Initiated by the Contractor — $1.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all California Institute of Technology federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →