NASA's PHOENIX Phase B contract awarded to Caltech for $73.2M, a sole-source R&D effort

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $73,220,798 ($73.2M)

Contractor: California Institute of Technology

Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Start Date: 2003-09-17

End Date: 2013-05-07

Contract Duration: 3,520 days

Daily Burn Rate: $20.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 51

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: PHOENIX - PHASE B

Place of Performance

Location: PASADENA, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 91125

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $73.2 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY for work described as: PHOENIX - PHASE B Key points: 1. Significant R&D investment in physical sciences. 2. Sole-source award raises questions about competition. 3. Long contract duration (2003-2013) suggests substantial project scope. 4. Potential for cost overruns in Cost Plus Award Fee contracts.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract is a Cost Plus Award Fee type, which can incentivize performance but also carries a risk of higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts. Without specific performance metrics and award fee structure, a precise value assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may have resulted in a higher price than could have been achieved through a bidding process, impacting taxpayer value.

Public Impact

Funding advanced research in physical sciences. Potential for groundbreaking discoveries impacting technology and understanding. Long-term commitment to a specific research area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost Plus Award Fee contract type
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Supports critical R&D for NASA
  • Awarded to a reputable research institution

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. Spending in this sector is crucial for innovation but often involves higher risk and less predictable outcomes than other sectors.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded to the California Institute of Technology, a large research institution. There is no indication of small business subcontracting in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The long duration and sole-source nature of this contract warrant careful oversight to ensure funds are used effectively and objectives are met. Award fee structures require clear performance metrics.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Limited transparency on performance metrics
  • Long contract duration may indicate scope creep or delays

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ca, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $73.2 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. PHOENIX - PHASE B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $73.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-09-17. End: 2013-05-07.

What specific research objectives were achieved under this contract, and how did they align with NASA's strategic goals?

The contract supported PHOENIX Phase B, likely involving research and development related to a specific scientific or engineering challenge. Without detailed project reports, it's difficult to ascertain the precise objectives and their alignment with NASA's broader mission. Further investigation into project milestones and outcomes would be necessary.

What was the rationale for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative competitive approaches considered?

Sole-source awards are typically justified when only one source possesses the unique capability or technology required. For this contract, the rationale might stem from Caltech's specialized expertise or proprietary technology. However, the absence of competition inherently limits price discovery and may not represent the best value for taxpayer funds.

How did the performance of Caltech under the Cost Plus Award Fee structure compare to the expected outcomes and award criteria?

The Cost Plus Award Fee structure incentivizes contractor performance by offering additional payment based on achieving specific metrics. Evaluating the effectiveness requires access to the award fee determination process and performance reviews. Without this information, it's impossible to definitively assess whether the contractor met expectations or if the fee structure drove optimal value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTSpace R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 51

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4800 OAK GROVE DR, PASADENA, CA, 91109

Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $73,481,006

Exercised Options: $73,481,006

Current Obligation: $73,220,798

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NAS703001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-09-17

Current End Date: 2013-05-07

Potential End Date: 2013-05-07 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2020-10-22

More Contracts from California Institute of Technology

View all California Institute of Technology federal contracts →

Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts

View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending