NASA's $26M Admin Services Contract Awarded to Infinity Technology, Inc. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $26,264,493 ($26.3M)
Contractor: Infinity Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2000-08-15
End Date: 2010-02-28
Contract Duration: 3,484 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 16
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: EDWARDS, KERN County, CALIFORNIA, 93523
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $26.3 million to INFINITY TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract Value: $26.26 million over its life. 2. Competition: Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Risk: Low risk indicated by firm fixed price contract type. 4. Sector: Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $26.26 million appears reasonable for administrative management and general management consulting services over a 10-year period. Benchmarking against similar contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value.
Public Impact
Supports NASA's administrative functions, ensuring operational efficiency. Contract duration of over 9 years indicates a long-term need for these services. The award to Infinity Technology, Inc. signifies a significant business opportunity for the contractor.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess effectiveness.
- Potential for scope creep in long-term administrative contracts.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks.
- Full and open competition suggests competitive pricing was achieved.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the administrative management and general management consulting services sector, which is crucial for supporting government agency operations. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on agency needs and project scope.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors in this award. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), which has established oversight mechanisms. However, specific details on the oversight applied to this particular contract are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract duration is lengthy, increasing potential for evolving needs.
- Limited information on specific deliverables and performance metrics.
- No indication of small business subcontracting goals or achievements.
- Potential for contractor lock-in due to long-term nature.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ca, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $26.3 million to INFINITY TECHNOLOGY, INC.. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INFINITY TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2000-08-15. End: 2010-02-28.
What specific administrative management and general management consulting services were provided under this contract?
The contract number and award data do not specify the exact services rendered. Typically, such contracts encompass a range of support functions including strategic planning, organizational analysis, process improvement, and general administrative support to facilitate the agency's mission objectives and operational efficiency.
What was the competitive landscape like for this contract, and did it result in significant cost savings?
Awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' this implies multiple bidders were considered. While full and open competition generally drives competitive pricing, the extent of cost savings compared to a sole-source or limited competition award would require detailed bid analysis not available in this summary data.
How effectively did Infinity Technology, Inc. perform its administrative services, and what was the impact on NASA's operations?
Performance effectiveness and operational impact are not detailed in the provided data. Assessing this would require reviewing performance reports, customer satisfaction surveys, and any documented outcomes or efficiencies achieved by Infinity Technology, Inc. during the contract's lifespan.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 16
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 430 WYNN DR NW, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 05
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $28,911,549
Exercised Options: $28,911,549
Current Obligation: $26,264,493
Timeline
Start Date: 2000-08-15
Current End Date: 2010-02-28
Potential End Date: 2010-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-07-19
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →