DoD's $11.9M TRF Recap Lift Station Project Awarded to JBW Group LLC in Georgia

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,900,000 ($11.9M)

Contractor: JBW Group LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-09-29

End Date: 2028-10-19

Contract Duration: 1,116 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: TRF RECAP LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT - DESIGN BUILD RFP.

Place of Performance

Location: KINGS BAY, CAMDEN County, GEORGIA, 31547

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.9 million to JBW GROUP LLC for work described as: TRF RECAP LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT - DESIGN BUILD RFP. Key points: 1. Value for money is difficult to assess without a competitive benchmark. 2. The contract was not competed, raising questions about price discovery. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with a long performance period. 4. Performance context is limited due to the lack of competition. 5. This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically water and sewer infrastructure. 6. The award represents a significant investment in critical infrastructure for the Navy in Georgia.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $11.9 million for a design-build project is substantial. However, without a competitive bidding process, it is challenging to benchmark the pricing against market rates or similar contracts. The fixed-price nature suggests cost certainty for the government, but the absence of competition prevents a definitive assessment of whether this represents good value for money. Further analysis would require understanding the scope of work and comparing it to industry standards for similar infrastructure projects.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded using a sole-source justification, meaning it was not open to full and open competition. The data indicates it was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'. This approach limits the number of potential bidders and may result in higher prices than if multiple companies had competed for the work. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from the price discovery mechanisms inherent in a competitive bidding process.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition means taxpayers may not have received the lowest possible price for this critical infrastructure project. Without competing bids, there is less pressure on the contractor to offer the most cost-effective solution.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Department of the Navy, ensuring the upgrade of essential water and sewer infrastructure. The project will deliver design and construction services for a lift station replacement. The geographic impact is concentrated in Georgia, supporting naval operations in the state. The contract is expected to create or sustain jobs in the construction sector within Georgia.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may lead to inflated costs.
Long contract duration (over 3 years) increases exposure to potential cost overruns or scope creep if not managed tightly.
Sole-source awards can set a precedent for future sole-source procurements if not carefully justified.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The project addresses critical infrastructure needs, ensuring operational readiness.
The contractor, JBW Group LLC, is being awarded a significant contract, suggesting some level of trust or capability assessment by the agency.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically focusing on heavy civil engineering and infrastructure. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 237110, 'Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction,' indicates a specialized area of construction. The market for such projects is often characterized by a mix of large, established firms and smaller, specialized contractors. Government contracts for infrastructure are a significant portion of this market, driven by the need to maintain and upgrade aging public facilities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary consideration or set-aside for this contract. This suggests that the procurement was likely aimed at larger firms with the capacity to handle complex design-build projects. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which could be a missed opportunity to engage the small business ecosystem in this significant infrastructure project.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Department of the Navy's contracting and project management officials. As a definitive contract, it is subject to standard federal procurement regulations and oversight. The specific mechanisms for accountability and transparency would be detailed within the contract itself, including reporting requirements and performance metrics. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any issues of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Contracts
Infrastructure Modernization Programs
Water and Wastewater System Construction

Risk Flags

Sole-source award lacks competitive pricing validation.
Long performance period increases potential for unforeseen issues.
Limited public information on contractor's specific past performance for similar projects.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.9 million to JBW GROUP LLC. TRF RECAP LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT - DESIGN BUILD RFP.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JBW GROUP LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-29. End: 2028-10-19.

What is the track record of JBW Group LLC on similar government contracts?

Information regarding JBW Group LLC's specific track record on similar government contracts is not provided in the data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on previous projects of comparable size and scope. Understanding their experience with design-build water and sewer infrastructure projects for the Department of Defense or other federal agencies would be crucial for evaluating their capability and reliability in executing this contract effectively. Without this historical data, the assessment of risk associated with the contractor is incomplete.

How does the contract value compare to similar lift station replacement projects?

The contract value of $11.9 million for a design-build lift station replacement is substantial. However, a direct comparison to similar projects is difficult without more specific details on the scope of work, geographical location, and the complexity of the required design and construction. Factors such as the capacity of the lift station, the environmental conditions, and the specific technological requirements can significantly influence project costs. Benchmarking would ideally involve analyzing data from recently awarded, competitively bid projects of similar scale and purpose within the Department of Defense or other federal agencies to ascertain if this price point is within a reasonable range.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for this type of project?

The primary risks associated with a sole-source award for a project of this magnitude include potential overpricing due to the lack of competitive pressure, reduced innovation from the contractor, and a diminished incentive to achieve optimal efficiency. Without competing bids, the government may end up paying more than necessary. Furthermore, a sole-source award can limit the agency's visibility into alternative solutions or technologies that might have been proposed by other firms. It also raises concerns about fairness and transparency in the procurement process, potentially impacting public trust and contractor morale.

What is the expected impact on operational readiness for the Department of the Navy?

The replacement of a lift station is critical for maintaining essential utilities and operational readiness at naval facilities. Lift stations are vital for managing wastewater and sewage, and their failure or inefficiency can lead to significant disruptions in base operations, environmental hazards, and potential health risks. By upgrading this infrastructure, the Department of the Navy ensures the continued functionality of its facilities, supports environmental compliance, and mitigates the risk of service interruptions, thereby directly contributing to sustained operational readiness.

What is the historical spending pattern for water and sewer infrastructure construction by the Department of the Navy in Georgia?

Historical spending patterns for water and sewer infrastructure construction by the Department of the Navy in Georgia are not detailed in the provided data. To assess this, one would need to analyze past contract awards for similar projects within the specified geographic region and agency. This would involve examining databases of federal procurement to identify trends in spending, the types of projects undertaken, the average contract values, and the frequency of such procurements. Understanding historical spending can help contextualize the current $11.9 million award and identify any significant shifts or increases in investment in this area.

Are there any specific performance metrics or milestones defined in the contract?

The provided data does not specify the performance metrics or milestones included in the contract. Typically, definitive contracts, especially design-build projects, outline detailed performance standards, delivery schedules, quality control requirements, and acceptance criteria. These are crucial for monitoring the contractor's progress and ensuring the project meets the government's needs. A thorough review of the contract document itself would be necessary to identify these specific performance indicators and understand how the contractor's adherence will be measured and enforced.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Utility System Construction › Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3501 HORACE AVE, FORT WORTH, TX, 76244

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native Hawaiian Organization Owned Firm, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,900,000

Exercised Options: $11,900,000

Current Obligation: $11,900,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline