JBW GROUP LLC Awarded $47.9M for Rugby Complex Flood Damage Repairs in New York

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $47,852,495 ($47.9M)

Contractor: JBW Group LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-12-18

End Date: 2026-08-26

Contract Duration: 982 days

Daily Burn Rate: $48.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN SERVICES TO DEVELOP FULL DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR REPAIRS TO THE RUGBY COMPLEX AND TWO BROOKS TO ADDRESS FLOOD DAMAGE. REPAIR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND WATERCOURSE MANAGEMENT

Place of Performance

Location: WEST POINT, ORANGE County, NEW YORK, 10996

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $47.9 million to JBW GROUP LLC for work described as: CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN SERVICES TO DEVELOP FULL DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR REPAIRS TO THE RUGBY COMPLEX AND TWO BROOKS TO ADDRESS FLOOD DAMAGE. REPAIR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND WATERCOURSE MANAGEMENT Key points: 1. Contract focuses on critical infrastructure repair and resilience. 2. Project addresses storm drainage and watercourse management, vital for community safety. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs for the government. 4. Long duration suggests a complex, multi-phase repair and design process. 5. Geographic focus on New York highlights regional infrastructure investment. 6. The contract's value places it as a significant investment in facility maintenance.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $47.9 million for construction and design services appears substantial for flood damage repairs. Benchmarking against similar large-scale infrastructure repair projects is necessary to fully assess value. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests an attempt to cap costs, but the long duration (982 days) could introduce risks of cost escalation if not managed tightly. Without specific details on the scope of repairs and the complexity of the design documents required, a definitive value assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicated as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'. This sole-source award means there was no opportunity for multiple vendors to bid, potentially limiting price discovery and the government's ability to secure the most competitive pricing. The rationale for a sole-source award, such as a unique capability or urgent need, is not provided in the data.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can result in higher costs for taxpayers as competition is absent, potentially leading to less favorable pricing than if multiple bids were solicited.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and potentially local communities in New York by restoring essential facilities. Services delivered include the development of full design documents for repairs and the repair of storm drainage systems and watercourse management. The geographic impact is concentrated in New York, specifically where the rugby complex and two brooks are located. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction workers, engineers, and design professionals involved in the project.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpayment and reduced value for taxpayer funds.
The extended contract duration increases the risk of unforeseen issues and potential cost overruns, despite the fixed-price nature.
Limited transparency due to sole-source award makes it difficult to assess the fairness of the price and contractor selection.
The specific nature of flood damage repairs can be complex and may require specialized expertise not readily available, justifying sole-source in some cases but requiring careful vetting.

Positive Signals

The contract addresses critical infrastructure needs, ensuring the functionality and safety of facilities.
The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government, assuming scope is well-defined.
The award to JBW GROUP LLC indicates a specific contractor is deemed capable of performing the required specialized work.
The project's focus on flood damage repair contributes to resilience and mitigation efforts against future environmental events.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction and Engineering sector, specifically focusing on commercial and institutional building construction. The market for such services is substantial, driven by government infrastructure needs, private development, and repair/maintenance projects. The value of this single contract, nearly $48 million, is significant and represents a notable investment in facility repair and resilience. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale government construction contracts for similar types of infrastructure repair or facility upgrades.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation is not a primary focus for this contract, as the 'ss' (small business set-aside) and 'sb' (small business) flags are false. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the prime contractor, JBW GROUP LLC, is not mandated to allocate a portion of the work to small businesses, which could limit opportunities for the small business ecosystem on this particular project.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Accountability measures are typically managed through contract administration, performance monitoring, and adherence to the firm-fixed-price terms. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise during the contract's performance.

Related Government Programs

Army Corps of Engineers Construction Projects
Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
Infrastructure Repair and Resilience Programs
Stormwater Management Projects
Federal Building and Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Sole-source award lacks competitive pricing.
Extended contract duration poses schedule and cost risks.
Limited transparency in contractor selection.
Potential for cost overruns if scope is not tightly managed.
Need for robust oversight due to lack of competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $47.9 million to JBW GROUP LLC. CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN SERVICES TO DEVELOP FULL DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR REPAIRS TO THE RUGBY COMPLEX AND TWO BROOKS TO ADDRESS FLOOD DAMAGE. REPAIR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND WATERCOURSE MANAGEMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JBW GROUP LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $47.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-12-18. End: 2026-08-26.

What is the specific scope of work for the "repairs to the rugby complex and two brooks" and what are the key design deliverables?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN SERVICES TO DEVELOP FULL DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR REPAIRS TO THE RUGBY COMPLEX AND TWO BROOKS TO ADDRESS FLOOD DAMAGE. REPAIR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND WATERCOURSE MANAGEMENT.' This suggests the project involves two main components: 1) Developing comprehensive design documents for the necessary repairs to the rugby complex and two associated brooks, which implies detailed architectural, engineering, and environmental assessments. 2) The actual repair of storm drainage systems and watercourse management, which could involve clearing debris, reinforcing banks, upgrading culverts, or implementing new drainage solutions. The 'full design documents' are a critical deliverable, as they will guide the subsequent construction phase and ensure compliance with relevant regulations and standards. Without access to the contract statement of work (SOW), the precise details of the repairs and the exact nature of the design deliverables remain unspecified, but they are clearly aimed at mitigating flood damage and improving water management.

How does the $47.9 million contract value compare to similar flood damage repair projects for federal facilities?

Benchmarking the $47.9 million contract value against similar flood damage repair projects for federal facilities requires access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts. However, as a general observation, this value is substantial and suggests a project of significant scale and complexity. Large-scale infrastructure repairs, especially those involving extensive design work and potentially complex environmental considerations for watercourses, can easily reach tens of millions of dollars. For context, major flood mitigation projects or repairs to significant federal installations following natural disasters often exceed this amount. The firm-fixed-price nature of this contract implies that the government has a defined budget ceiling, but the long duration (982 days) means that the initial cost estimate must have been robust. Without specific comparable projects detailing scope, location, and duration, a precise comparison is difficult, but the figure indicates a major investment in facility resilience.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for a construction and design contract of this magnitude?

The primary risk associated with a sole-source award for a $47.9 million construction and design contract is the potential for reduced value for taxpayer money due to the absence of competition. Without multiple bids, the government may not achieve the most competitive pricing, potentially leading to overpayment. Furthermore, a sole-source award can sometimes indicate a lack of market research or an assumption that only one contractor possesses the necessary unique capabilities, which may not always be accurate. This can stifle innovation and limit the government's access to a wider pool of qualified contractors. Transparency is also reduced, making it harder to scrutinize the fairness of the price and the selection process. While sole-source awards are sometimes justified by urgent needs or highly specialized requirements, they necessitate rigorous justification and oversight to mitigate these inherent risks.

Given the firm-fixed-price contract type and the long duration, what are the key performance indicators (KPIs) the Department of the Army should monitor?

For this firm-fixed-price contract with a 982-day duration, the Department of the Army should closely monitor several key performance indicators (KPIs). Firstly, adherence to the project schedule is crucial; delays could indicate mismanagement or unforeseen issues that might strain the fixed price if not managed contractually. Secondly, quality control is paramount; the Army must ensure the design documents are comprehensive and accurate, and that the subsequent repairs meet all specified standards and requirements. Thirdly, progress payments should be meticulously tracked against milestones achieved to ensure value for money. Fourthly, change order management is critical; any proposed changes to the scope must be rigorously evaluated for necessity and cost impact, with strict controls to prevent scope creep that could undermine the fixed-price benefit. Finally, contractor performance reviews, including site inspections and documentation audits, will provide ongoing insights into JBW GROUP LLC's execution and adherence to contract terms.

What is JBW GROUP LLC's track record with the Department of Defense, particularly on similar construction or infrastructure repair projects?

The provided data does not include specific details about JBW GROUP LLC's past performance or track record with the Department of Defense (DoD) or on similar construction and infrastructure repair projects. To assess this, one would need to consult federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) for historical contract awards to JBW GROUP LLC, review past performance evaluations (if publicly available), and examine any reported issues or successes on previous government contracts. Without this information, it is difficult to gauge their experience, reliability, and capability in handling a project of this scale and nature. The fact that this contract was awarded sole-source might imply that the DoD has prior positive experience or knowledge of JBW GROUP LLC's capabilities, but this cannot be confirmed from the given data alone.

What are the implications of the 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' NAICS code for this contract?

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220, 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction,' signifies that the primary activity under this contract involves the construction or renovation of buildings intended for commercial or institutional use, rather than residential or heavy civil engineering projects like highways. For this specific contract, it means the focus is on the physical structures of the rugby complex and potentially related facilities, encompassing all phases from design to potential construction elements related to the building itself. This code helps categorize the type of work being performed and allows for comparison with industry standards, labor statistics, and other commercial construction projects. It suggests that the contractor must possess expertise in building construction methods, materials, and project management relevant to non-residential structures.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W912DS23R0021

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3501 HORACE AVE, FORT WORTH, TX, 76244

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native Hawaiian Organization Owned Firm, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $47,852,495

Exercised Options: $47,852,495

Current Obligation: $47,852,495

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline