Naval Air Station Pensacola contract for facilities support services awarded at $24.5M, highlighting J&J and Alms Mission Support Solutions' role

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,520,619 ($24.5M)

Contractor: J&J and Alms Mission Support Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-04-01

End Date: 2024-03-31

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $67.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NAS PENSACOLA BOSC BASE PERIOD FUNDING TO

Place of Performance

Location: PENSACOLA, ESCAMBIA County, FLORIDA, 32508

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $24.5 million to J&J AND ALMS MISSION SUPPORT SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: NAS PENSACOLA BOSC BASE PERIOD FUNDING TO Key points: 1. The contract value of $24.5 million for facilities support services represents a significant investment in maintaining critical infrastructure. 2. Competition dynamics for this contract are assessed to understand pricing efficiency and potential for taxpayer savings. 3. Risk indicators are evaluated based on contractor performance history and the nature of facilities support services. 4. Performance context is established by comparing this award to similar contracts for base operations support. 5. The sector positioning of facilities support services is crucial for overall defense readiness and operational continuity. 6. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to provide cost certainty for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $24.5 million for facilities support services at NAS Pensacola appears reasonable given the scope of base operations. Benchmarking against similar contracts for large naval installations suggests that pricing is competitive. The firm-fixed-price structure provides a degree of cost predictability, which is a positive indicator for value for money. However, a detailed cost breakdown and comparison to industry standards for specific services like maintenance, janitorial, and groundskeeping would provide a more precise value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of a competitive bidding process is generally expected to drive down prices and encourage innovation. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors, maximizing the use of public funds.

Public Impact

Naval Air Station Pensacola personnel and operations benefit from well-maintained facilities, ensuring readiness and operational efficiency. Services delivered include a broad range of facilities support, likely encompassing maintenance, janitorial, groundskeeping, and potentially other base operating support functions. The geographic impact is concentrated at NAS Pensacola, Florida, supporting a key naval aviation training and operational hub. Workforce implications include the potential for direct and indirect employment opportunities within the local Florida economy through the prime contractor and its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if not clearly defined in the contract.
Dependence on contractor performance for critical base operations.
Ensuring consistent quality across all facilities support services.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
Contract supports a critical naval installation, ensuring operational readiness.

Sector Analysis

The facilities support services sector is a vital component of the defense industry, encompassing a wide array of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of military installations. This contract fits within the broader category of base operations support (BOS), which is a significant area of government spending. Comparable spending benchmarks for BOS contracts can vary widely based on the size and complexity of the installation, but typically represent billions of dollars annually across the federal government.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside for this contract. This suggests that the competition was open to all responsible sources, and there is no explicit requirement for subcontracting to small businesses mandated within the award details. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether J&J and Alms Mission Support Solutions voluntarily engage small businesses as subcontractors, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded within the firm-fixed-price contract terms, performance work statements, and inspection processes. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics and specific oversight activities are often internal to the agency.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support Services
Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Naval Installation Support
Defense Infrastructure Management

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues impacting base operations.
Risk of cost escalation if contract terms are not robust.
Dependency on contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $24.5 million to J&J AND ALMS MISSION SUPPORT SOLUTIONS, LLC. NAS PENSACOLA BOSC BASE PERIOD FUNDING TO

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J&J AND ALMS MISSION SUPPORT SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-04-01. End: 2024-03-31.

What is the track record of J&J and Alms Mission Support Solutions, LLC with federal contracts, particularly in facilities support?

A comprehensive review of the track record for J&J and Alms Mission Support Solutions, LLC would involve examining their past performance on federal contracts, specifically within the facilities support and base operations domains. This includes assessing their history of meeting performance requirements, adherence to schedules, and overall client satisfaction as documented in past performance evaluations. Analyzing their contract award history can reveal the types and values of contracts they have previously managed, as well as their success rate in competitive bidding processes. Understanding their experience with similar-sized and scoped contracts is crucial for evaluating their capability to successfully execute the NAS Pensacola BOS contract. Without specific past performance data, it is difficult to definitively assess their reliability and expertise.

How does the awarded amount of $24.5 million compare to similar facilities support contracts at other naval installations?

To benchmark the $24.5 million award for NAS Pensacola, one would compare it to similar Base Operations Support (BOS) contracts at other naval installations of comparable size and scope. Factors such as geographic location, climate (affecting maintenance needs), specific services included (e.g., housing, transportation, fire services), and the duration of the contract period are critical for a fair comparison. For instance, a contract for a large training command might differ significantly from one supporting a major fleet concentration area. Preliminary analysis suggests that $24.5 million for a one-year period (base period) for facilities support at a significant installation like Pensacola is within a reasonable range, but a detailed comparison with publicly available data on other BOS contracts would be necessary to confirm if it represents excellent, good, or fair value.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this type of facilities support contract?

Primary risk indicators for facilities support contracts like this one include the potential for contractor underperformance, which could disrupt critical base operations. Another risk is cost overruns, particularly if the firm-fixed-price contract does not adequately account for unforeseen maintenance issues or price escalations in labor and materials. The complexity of managing a wide array of services (e.g., janitorial, groundskeeping, minor repairs) can also pose a risk if the contractor lacks robust management systems. Furthermore, reliance on a single contractor for essential services creates a dependency risk; any failure on their part can have significant operational impacts. Ensuring adequate oversight and performance monitoring is key to mitigating these risks.

What is the expected effectiveness of this contract in ensuring the operational readiness of NAS Pensacola?

The effectiveness of this contract in ensuring the operational readiness of NAS Pensacola hinges on the contractor's ability to consistently deliver high-quality facilities support services as outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Well-maintained facilities, reliable utilities, and clean operational spaces are fundamental to supporting training, maintenance, and administrative functions. If the contractor performs effectively, it directly contributes to a safe and functional environment, thereby enhancing the base's overall readiness. Conversely, any lapse in service could impede training schedules, compromise equipment, or affect the morale and productivity of personnel. The firm-fixed-price nature incentivizes the contractor to perform efficiently, but rigorous government oversight is still essential to guarantee effectiveness.

How has federal spending on facilities support services evolved over the past five years, and what are the trends?

Federal spending on facilities support services has generally seen a steady increase over the past five years, driven by the need to maintain aging infrastructure across various government agencies, particularly within the Department of Defense. Trends indicate a move towards more comprehensive Base Operations Support (BOS) contracts that consolidate multiple service requirements under single prime contractors, aiming for greater efficiency and cost savings. There's also an increasing emphasis on performance-based contracts and the integration of technology for facility management and predictive maintenance. However, budget constraints and shifting priorities can lead to fluctuations in specific agency or installation spending. Analyzing historical spending data for the Navy and specific installations like NAS Pensacola would reveal more granular trends.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N6945021R0049

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3909 ARCTIC BLVD STE 500, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,520,619

Exercised Options: $24,520,619

Current Obligation: $24,520,619

Actual Outlays: $254,514

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $23,848,695

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6945022D0043

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline