DoD awards $5.4M for Joint Intelligence Operations Center at Pearl Harbor-Hickam, with engineering services to be delivered by Jacobs/B&M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,377,509 ($5.4M)

Contractor: Jacobs/B&m a Joint Venture

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-04-21

End Date: 2026-12-01

Contract Duration: 589 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FY28 MCON PROJECT P-079 JOINT INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS CENTER (JIOC) JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM HI, USA

Place of Performance

Location: JBPHH, HONOLULU County, HAWAII, 96860

State: Hawaii Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $5.4 million to JACOBS/B&M A JOINT VENTURE for work described as: FY28 MCON PROJECT P-079 JOINT INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS CENTER (JIOC) JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM HI, USA Key points: 1. The contract value represents a significant investment in critical intelligence infrastructure. 2. Engineering services are essential for maintaining and upgrading complex operational facilities. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests a defined scope and budget, potentially mitigating cost overruns. 4. The project duration of approximately 1.9 years indicates a focused, medium-term effort. 5. The award is a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle, suggesting a streamlined procurement process. 6. The geographic location in Hawaii highlights the strategic importance of the facility in the Pacific region.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

Benchmarking the specific value of $5.4 million for this type of engineering service is challenging without more detailed scope information. However, the firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control. The award to a joint venture suggests a capacity to handle complex projects. Further analysis would require comparing this to similar JIOC construction or renovation projects, considering the specific engineering disciplines required and the prevailing labor and material costs in Hawaii.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This competitive process is designed to ensure the government receives the best value by encouraging a range of technical solutions and pricing. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but full and open competition generally leads to more robust price discovery and a wider selection of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is the most advantageous for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for competitive pricing and ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, thereby driving down costs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies relying on the Joint Intelligence Operations Center. The services delivered will support the maintenance, upgrade, and operational readiness of critical intelligence infrastructure. The geographic impact is concentrated at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, a key strategic location. The contract will likely involve a workforce of engineers, project managers, and potentially skilled trades, contributing to local employment in Hawaii.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the initial project definition is not precise.
Reliance on a joint venture may introduce coordination challenges between the parent companies.
Geographic isolation of Hawaii could impact logistics and material costs.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
Award to a joint venture indicates specialized capabilities for complex projects.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting defense infrastructure. The market for specialized engineering services for military installations is substantial, driven by the need for continuous modernization and maintenance of facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other large-scale construction, renovation, or specialized facility support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies for similar types of operational centers.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not specify any small business set-aside. Therefore, there is no direct indication of small business participation as the prime contractor. However, the prime contractor, Jacobs/B&M A Joint Venture, may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill specific aspects of the engineering services required, which would be detailed in their subcontracting plan.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and project management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being made under full and open competition, with public reporting mechanisms for federal contract awards.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction (MILCON)
Defense Intelligence Agency Facilities
Joint Intelligence Operations Centers
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope is not tightly managed.
Logistical challenges due to remote island location.
Dependence on joint venture partner performance.
Integration risks with existing intelligence systems.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $5.4 million to JACOBS/B&M A JOINT VENTURE. FY28 MCON PROJECT P-079 JOINT INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS CENTER (JIOC) JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM HI, USA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JACOBS/B&M A JOINT VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-04-21. End: 2026-12-01.

What is the track record of Jacobs/B&M A Joint Venture in performing similar engineering services for defense facilities?

Assessing the specific track record of the joint venture 'Jacobs/B&M A Joint Venture' requires examining past performance data for both Jacobs and B&M, individually and potentially as a joint venture on prior projects. Jacobs is a large, well-established engineering firm with extensive experience in government contracting, including defense infrastructure. B&M's specific experience would need to be evaluated. A review of their contract history, past performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any reported issues or successes on similar projects would provide insight into their capability to execute this Joint Intelligence Operations Center project effectively. The Department of Defense typically maintains performance records that inform future source selections.

How does the $5.4 million contract value compare to similar engineering services for intelligence facilities?

Directly comparing the $5.4 million value is difficult without a precise scope of work and detailed service breakdown. However, this amount suggests a significant but not massive project, likely focused on specific upgrades, renovations, or specialized engineering design for the JIOC. Larger MILCON projects for new intelligence facilities can run into hundreds of millions or billions. Smaller, more routine maintenance or specialized consulting might be in the hundreds of thousands. This $5.4 million falls into a mid-range for substantial engineering support to a critical facility, implying a focused scope of work rather than a complete new build.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential scope creep if the project requirements are not clearly defined, leading to cost overruns despite the fixed-price nature. Technical risks related to integrating new systems or upgrading aging infrastructure are also present. Logistical challenges and higher costs due to the remote island location of Hawaii could impact material delivery and specialized labor availability. Mitigation strategies likely include rigorous project management, detailed technical specifications, phased delivery schedules, and robust quality assurance processes. The firm-fixed-price contract itself is a primary risk mitigation tool, placing the cost burden on the contractor for defined work.

What is the expected effectiveness of the engineering services in enhancing the JIOC's capabilities?

The effectiveness hinges on the specific engineering tasks undertaken. If the services involve modernizing IT infrastructure, improving physical security, enhancing power and cooling systems, or optimizing workspace design, the JIOC's operational effectiveness, data processing capabilities, and personnel support should improve. The contract's success will be measured by the timely and quality delivery of these engineering solutions, ultimately contributing to the JIOC's mission readiness and its ability to support intelligence analysis and operations in the Indo-Pacific region.

What are historical spending patterns for engineering services at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam?

Historical spending on engineering services at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam would likely show a consistent need for facility upgrades, maintenance, and modernization, reflecting its status as a major naval installation and strategic hub. Spending patterns would be influenced by military construction priorities, technological advancements in intelligence gathering and analysis, and the overall defense budget. Analyzing past awards from agencies like the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) for similar projects (e.g., infrastructure upgrades, IT systems integration, facility renovations) at JBPHH would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the contractors most frequently engaged.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 155 N LAKE AVE STE 150, PASADENA, CA, 91101

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,377,509

Exercised Options: $5,377,509

Current Obligation: $5,377,509

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $604,360

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6274220D0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline