Navy Awards $81.8M Construction Contract to Dick Corporation for Building Upgrades
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $81,778,969 ($81.8M)
Contractor: Dick Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-05-26
End Date: 2008-04-01
Contract Duration: 1,041 days
Daily Burn Rate: $78.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200508!009305!1700!N62467!NAVY FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMM!N6246705C0099 !A!N! !N! ! !20050526!20070527!037937786!037937786!037937786!N!DICK CORPORATION !1900 STATE RTE 51 !CLAIRTON !PA!15025!47970!033!12!NAVAL STATION !ESCAMBIA !FLORIDA !+000079017192!N!N!000079017192!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!002!B! !D!N!C! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!C!Y! !N! ! !1700!N00204!0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: PENSACOLA, ESCAMBIA County, FLORIDA, 32508
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $81.8 million to DICK CORPORATION for work described as: 200508!009305!1700!N62467!NAVY FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMM!N6246705C0099 !A!N! !N! ! !20050526!20070527!037937786!037937786!037937786!N!DICK CORPORATION !1900 STATE RTE 51 !CLAIRTON !PA!15025!47970!033!12!NAVAL STATION !ESCA… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $81.8 million, was awarded to Dick Corporation for miscellaneous building construction. 2. This award represents a significant investment in infrastructure by the Department of Defense, specifically the Navy. 3. The project falls under the broad category of commercial and institutional building construction, a competitive sector. 4. Potential risks include project delays, cost overruns, and unforeseen site conditions common in large construction projects.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $81.8 million appears reasonable for a large-scale construction project of this nature. Benchmarking against similar naval facility construction contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is expected to yield a fair price, maximizing taxpayer value for the construction services.
Public Impact
Enhances naval operational capabilities through improved facilities. Supports local economy through construction jobs and material procurement. Potential for long-term cost savings through modernized infrastructure. Ensures compliance with modern building codes and safety standards.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in large construction projects.
- Reliance on a single prime contractor for complex execution.
- Weather and environmental factors can impact construction timelines.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Fixed-price contract type can limit cost uncertainty.
- Experienced contractor with a history of government work.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction. Spending in this area is substantial, driven by government infrastructure needs and private development.
Small Business Impact
While Dick Corporation is the prime contractor, opportunities for small businesses may exist as subcontractors for specialized services or material supply within this large construction project.
Oversight & Accountability
Standard oversight mechanisms for federal construction contracts would apply, including site inspections, progress reporting, and quality assurance checks by the Navy.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise.
- Risk of schedule delays due to weather or supply chain issues.
- Dependence on the financial stability and performance of Dick Corporation.
- Scope creep could lead to increased costs beyond the initial award.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, fl, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $81.8 million to DICK CORPORATION. 200508!009305!1700!N62467!NAVY FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMM!N6246705C0099 !A!N! !N! ! !20050526!20070527!037937786!037937786!037937786!N!DICK CORPORATION !1900 STATE RTE 51 !CLAIRTON !PA!15025!47970!033!12!NAVAL STATION !ESCAMBIA !FLORIDA !+000079017192!N!N!000079017192!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DICK CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $81.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-05-26. End: 2008-04-01.
What specific types of 'other miscellaneous buildings' are included in this contract, and what is their current condition?
The contract specifies 'OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS' without further detail in the provided data. A thorough review of the contract's statement of work would be necessary to identify the exact structures. Understanding their current condition is crucial for assessing the necessity and scope of the renovation or construction work, and thus the overall value proposition of the contract.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will contractor performance be measured?
Key performance indicators for construction contracts typically include adherence to schedule, budget, quality standards, and safety regulations. The Navy's contracting officer and technical representatives would monitor these aspects through regular site visits, progress reports, and milestone reviews. Failure to meet KPIs could result in penalties or contract modifications, impacting the contractor's future eligibility for government work.
What is the long-term maintenance plan for the upgraded facilities, and how does this contract contribute to it?
This contract likely focuses on the initial construction or renovation. The long-term maintenance plan would be a separate consideration managed by the Navy's facilities management. However, by ensuring high-quality construction and using durable materials, this contract can contribute to reduced future maintenance costs and extended facility lifespans, thereby enhancing overall long-term value.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: DCK Worldwide, LLC (UEI: 826879426)
Address: 1900 STATE RTE 51, CLAIRTON, PA, 15025
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-05-26
Current End Date: 2008-04-01
Potential End Date: 2008-04-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-07-28
More Contracts from Dick Corporation
- Federal Contract — $119.6M (General Services Administration)
- Federal Contract — $73.7M (General Services Administration)
- Design Review — $36.2M (General Services Administration)
- THE Purpose of This Modification IS for the Following Scope of Work: Cor's 51, 92, 99, 108, 114, 118 and 119 — $12.6M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)