GSA Awards $36.16M for Design Review to Dick Corporation Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $36,159,938 ($36.2M)
Contractor: Dick Corporation
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2005-06-22
End Date: 2011-02-25
Contract Duration: 2,074 days
Daily Burn Rate: $17.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: DESIGN REVIEW
Place of Performance
Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44199
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $36.2 million to DICK CORPORATION for work described as: DESIGN REVIEW Key points: 1. The contract value of $36.16 million for design review services is substantial. 2. Dick Corporation, the awardee, operates within the commercial and institutional building construction sector. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The duration of 2074 days indicates a long-term project.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $36.16 million for design review services over 2074 days appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction design review contracts would provide a clearer picture of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing and allows for a wide range of qualified contractors to bid. This method is expected to yield fair market prices.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayers are likely receiving a fair price for the design review services rendered.
Public Impact
Public infrastructure projects often involve extensive design review phases to ensure quality and compliance. The General Services Administration (GSA) manages a vast portfolio of federal buildings, impacting public access and services. Construction sector contracts can influence local economies through job creation and material sourcing.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data.
- Potential for cost overruns in long-duration construction projects.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a critical phase.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type can provide cost certainty.
- Long contract duration may indicate a well-defined and extensive scope.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant area of federal spending. Benchmarks for design review services within this sector are highly project-specific, but large-scale projects like this typically involve substantial investment.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the awardee is Dick Corporation, and there is no explicit mention of small business participation. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing federal building projects. Oversight mechanisms would typically include regular progress reports, site inspections, and adherence to contract terms to ensure accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- General Services Administration Contracting
- Public Buildings Service Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep over the long contract duration.
- Limited visibility into the specific performance metrics and quality assurance processes.
- No explicit indication of small business subcontracting.
- Dependence on a single firm for critical design review functions.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, general-services-administration, oh, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $36.2 million to DICK CORPORATION. DESIGN REVIEW
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DICK CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $36.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-06-22. End: 2011-02-25.
What specific design review tasks are included in this $36.16 million contract, and how do they align with the project's overall construction scope?
The provided data does not detail the specific tasks within the design review. Typically, this would encompass reviewing architectural and engineering plans, ensuring compliance with building codes and federal standards, identifying potential constructability issues, and verifying cost estimates. The alignment with the overall construction scope would depend on the specific federal facility being developed or renovated.
What were the key factors considered during the full and open competition that led to the selection of Dick Corporation, and were there any significant price differences among bidders?
While the data confirms full and open competition, it does not specify the evaluation criteria beyond the award to Dick Corporation. Typically, factors include technical qualifications, past performance, management approach, and price. Without bid data, it's impossible to assess price differences, though the firm fixed price suggests a ceiling was established.
Given the 2074-day duration, what mechanisms are in place to ensure the continued effectiveness and relevance of the design review throughout the project lifecycle?
Mechanisms for ensuring continued effectiveness over a long duration typically involve phased reviews, incorporating feedback loops, and allowing for contract modifications if project requirements evolve. Regular progress meetings, independent quality assurance checks, and clear communication channels between the design reviewers, construction team, and GSA are crucial for maintaining relevance and addressing emerging issues.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation ID: GS05P05GBC0018
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: DCK Worldwide, LLC (UEI: 826879426)
Address: 1900 STATE ROUTE 51, LARGE, PA, 12
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $36,366,522
Exercised Options: $36,365,540
Current Obligation: $36,159,938
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-06-22
Current End Date: 2011-02-25
Potential End Date: 2011-06-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-09-23
More Contracts from Dick Corporation
- Federal Contract — $119.6M (General Services Administration)
- 200508!009305!1700!n62467!navy Facilities Engineering Comm!n6246705c0099 !A!N! !N! ! !20050526!20070527!037937786!037937786!037937786!n!dick Corporation !1900 State RTE 51 !clairton !pa!15025!47970!033!12!naval Station !escambia !florida !+000079017192!n!n!000079017192!y199!other Miscellaneous Buildings !C2 !construction !000 !* !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!002!b! !D!N!C! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!y! !N! ! !1700!N00204!0001! ! — $81.8M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $73.7M (General Services Administration)
- THE Purpose of This Modification IS for the Following Scope of Work: Cor's 51, 92, 99, 108, 114, 118 and 119 — $12.6M (General Services Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)