DoD's Navy awards $17.2M for aviation training courseware development to Integration Innovation Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,162,635 ($17.2M)

Contractor: Integration Innovation Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-06-26

End Date: 2027-06-27

Contract Duration: 731 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: RRL FY24 CONTENT CONVERSION AVIATION RATINGS DELIVERY ORDER 8, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRAINING COURSEWARE.

Place of Performance

Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35808

State: Alabama Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.2 million to INTEGRATION INNOVATION INC for work described as: RRL FY24 CONTENT CONVERSION AVIATION RATINGS DELIVERY ORDER 8, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRAINING COURSEWARE. Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in modernizing aviation training capabilities. 2. The fixed-price contract type suggests a defined scope and potential for cost control. 3. A 2-year performance period indicates a focused effort on courseware design and development. 4. The awardee, Integration Innovation Inc., will be responsible for delivering critical training materials. 5. This contract falls under Engineering Services, highlighting the technical expertise required. 6. The geographic location of performance in Alabama may have local economic implications.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $17.2 million for a 2-year period for courseware development appears reasonable given the specialized nature of aviation training. Benchmarking against similar contracts for instructional system design and development would provide a more precise value assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price structure aims to ensure cost predictability for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is expected to yield a fair market price and encourage innovation. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment.

Public Impact

Naval aviators and aircrew will benefit from updated and potentially more effective training courseware. The services delivered include the design and development of training materials, crucial for skill acquisition and maintenance. Performance is located in Alabama, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in the region. The contract supports the readiness and operational effectiveness of naval aviation personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if initial requirements are not clearly defined.
Dependence on contractor's ability to deliver high-quality, relevant training content.
Risk of schedule delays if development encounters unforeseen technical challenges.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
Clear performance period of two years allows for focused execution.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader Engineering Services sector, specifically focusing on the development of specialized training solutions. The market for defense training and simulation is substantial, driven by the need for continuous modernization of skills and equipment. This contract contributes to the government's investment in human capital development within the aviation domain, a critical component of national defense.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business participation, including set-asides or subcontracting plans, was not explicitly provided in the data. As the contract was awarded under full and open competition, the primary focus was likely on technical and price proposals from all eligible offerors. Further analysis would be needed to determine any specific small business engagement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Navy contracting officers and program managers. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and adherence to contract terms will be key oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific details of ongoing oversight are not detailed here.

Related Government Programs

Naval Aviation Training Programs
Defense Training and Simulation Contracts
Courseware Development Services
Engineering Services for Defense

Risk Flags

Potential for schedule delays
Risk of cost overruns if scope is not well-defined
Ensuring training content remains current with evolving technology

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.2 million to INTEGRATION INNOVATION INC. RRL FY24 CONTENT CONVERSION AVIATION RATINGS DELIVERY ORDER 8, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRAINING COURSEWARE.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTEGRATION INNOVATION INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-06-26. End: 2027-06-27.

What is the track record of Integration Innovation Inc. in delivering similar defense training courseware?

A thorough review of Integration Innovation Inc.'s past performance is crucial. This would involve examining previous contracts with the Department of Defense or other federal agencies for similar services, such as instructional design, courseware development, and simulation training. Key metrics to assess would include on-time delivery, adherence to budget, quality of deliverables, and customer satisfaction ratings. Analyzing past performance data can provide insights into the contractor's reliability, technical capabilities, and overall suitability for this specific aviation training courseware project. Without specific past performance data, it is difficult to definitively assess their track record.

How does the $17.2 million contract value compare to industry benchmarks for aviation courseware development?

Benchmarking the $17.2 million contract value requires comparing it against similar projects in the defense aviation training sector. Factors influencing cost include the complexity of the subject matter, the required level of interactivity, the target audience (e.g., pilots, maintenance crews), and the delivery format (e.g., computer-based training, virtual reality). A typical range for developing sophisticated aviation courseware can vary widely, from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars, depending on these factors. The firm-fixed-price nature of this contract suggests a defined scope, which aids in cost predictability. However, a detailed comparison would necessitate access to data on the scope and complexity of the courseware to be developed under this specific contract.

What are the primary risks associated with the development of aviation training courseware, and how are they mitigated in this contract?

Key risks in aviation courseware development include technical obsolescence of training content, difficulty in accurately simulating complex operational environments, ensuring compliance with evolving aviation regulations, and contractor performance issues. This contract attempts to mitigate some risks through a firm-fixed-price structure, which incentivizes the contractor to manage costs and adhere to the defined scope. The 2-year performance period provides a defined timeline for development and delivery. However, risks related to the accuracy and effectiveness of the training content, and the contractor's ability to meet evolving requirements, would require ongoing government oversight and quality assurance processes throughout the contract lifecycle.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the readiness and effectiveness of naval aviation personnel?

This contract is expected to significantly enhance the readiness and effectiveness of naval aviation personnel by providing them with modern, relevant, and potentially more engaging training courseware. High-quality training materials are essential for pilots, aircrew, and support staff to maintain proficiency in operating complex aircraft and executing critical missions. Improved training can lead to better decision-making, reduced error rates, enhanced safety, and ultimately, a more capable and prepared naval aviation force. The specific impact will depend on the quality and applicability of the developed courseware to current and future operational needs.

How has federal spending on aviation training and courseware development evolved over recent fiscal years?

Federal spending on aviation training and courseware development has generally seen consistent investment, driven by the continuous need to maintain a highly skilled aviation workforce and adapt to technological advancements in aircraft and mission requirements. While specific figures fluctuate year-to-year based on program needs and budget allocations, the overall trend indicates a sustained commitment. Factors influencing spending include the introduction of new aircraft platforms, updates to existing systems, changes in military doctrine, and the adoption of new training technologies like simulation and virtual reality. Analyzing historical spending patterns for the Department of the Navy and the broader Department of Defense can reveal trends in investment priorities within this critical capability area.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N6134023R0073

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8000 RIDEOUT SW, SUITE 400, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35808

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,162,635

Exercised Options: $17,162,635

Current Obligation: $17,162,635

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6134024D0006

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline