Navy Awards $18.9M Firefighting Training Contract to Prevailance, Inc. Amidst Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,941,906 ($18.9M)

Contractor: Prevailance, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-01-20

End Date: 2026-02-17

Contract Duration: 1,489 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FIRE FIGHTING, DAMAGE CONTROL, AND ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR INSTRUCTOR SERVICES (CIS) FOR SWSC, PMS 339, AND SLC AT THE FOLLOWING TRAINING LOCATIONS: SAN DIEGO, CA, GREAT LAKES, IL, PEARL HARBOR, HI, NEWPORT, RI, NORFOLK, VA AND GROTON, CT.

Place of Performance

Location: VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23462

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.9 million to PREVAILANCE, INC. for work described as: FIRE FIGHTING, DAMAGE CONTROL, AND ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR INSTRUCTOR SERVICES (CIS) FOR SWSC, PMS 339, AND SLC AT THE FOLLOWING TRAINING LOCATIONS: SAN DIEGO, CA, GREAT LAKES, IL, PEARL HARBOR, HI, NEWPORT, RI, NORFOLK, VA AND GROTON, CT. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Prevailance, Inc. for critical firefighting and damage control training. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract spans multiple training locations across the US, indicating broad operational support. 4. Risk appears moderate given the firm-fixed-price structure, but performance monitoring is key.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $18.9M over approximately 4 years appears reasonable for specialized technical training services. Benchmarking against similar instructor services contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while sources were initially excluded, the remaining pool was competed openly, likely leading to competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential training to maintain naval readiness and safety, representing a necessary investment.

Public Impact

Ensures readiness of naval personnel in critical firefighting and damage control skills. Supports multiple training facilities nationwide, standardizing training delivery. Provides specialized instruction for complex engineering systems. Contract duration of nearly 5 years allows for consistent service delivery.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns if scope creeps beyond initial requirements.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for critical training services.
  • Geographic dispersion of training sites may add logistical complexity.

Positive Signals

  • Firm-fixed-price contract helps control costs.
  • Full and open competition generally leads to better value.
  • Long-term contract provides stability for training continuity.
  • Multiple locations ensure widespread access to training.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on technical training. Spending benchmarks for similar instructor services in the defense sector can vary widely based on specialization and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not directly awarded this contract, as Prevailance, Inc. is the prime contractor. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Navy is the awarding agency, implying established oversight mechanisms. The contract type and duration suggest a need for diligent performance monitoring and financial oversight to ensure value and compliance.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Technical and Trade Schools
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Contract performance risk
  • Cost control risk
  • Quality assurance risk
  • Contractor dependency risk

Tags

other-technical-and-trade-schools, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.9 million to PREVAILANCE, INC.. FIRE FIGHTING, DAMAGE CONTROL, AND ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR INSTRUCTOR SERVICES (CIS) FOR SWSC, PMS 339, AND SLC AT THE FOLLOWING TRAINING LOCATIONS: SAN DIEGO, CA, GREAT LAKES, IL, PEARL HARBOR, HI, NEWPORT, RI, NORFOLK, VA AND GROTON, CT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PREVAILANCE, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-01-20. End: 2026-02-17.

What is the specific breakdown of training hours and instructor rates included in the $18.9M contract value?

The provided data does not detail the specific breakdown of training hours or instructor rates. A comprehensive analysis would require access to the contract's detailed schedule of services and pricing. Understanding these specifics is crucial for assessing the true value and efficiency of the awarded contract.

How will the Navy ensure the quality and effectiveness of the firefighting and damage control training provided by Prevailance, Inc. across all locations?

The Navy will likely employ a multi-faceted approach to ensure training quality. This typically includes establishing clear performance standards and metrics within the contract, conducting regular site visits and performance reviews, soliciting feedback from trainees, and potentially utilizing independent evaluators to assess instructor performance and curriculum effectiveness.

What are the potential risks associated with the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method, and how were they mitigated?

This method could pose a risk if the initial exclusion criteria were overly restrictive, potentially limiting the competitive pool and leading to a less optimal outcome. Mitigation likely involved a clear, justifiable rationale for the exclusion and ensuring the remaining open competition was robust enough to drive competitive pricing and select the best value offeror.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational ServicesTechnical and Trade SchoolsOther Technical and Trade Schools

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAININGEDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N6134021R0048

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Prevailance Inc.

Address: 4500 MAIN ST STE 460, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, 23462

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,047,613

Exercised Options: $18,941,906

Current Obligation: $18,941,906

Actual Outlays: $6,678,611

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2022-01-20

Current End Date: 2026-02-17

Potential End Date: 2027-01-17 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-04

More Contracts from Prevailance, Inc.

View all Prevailance, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending