DoD Awards $11.6M for Ship Repair to Cascade General, LLC Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,657,654 ($11.7M)
Contractor: Cascade General, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-01-02
End Date: 2008-04-15
Contract Duration: 104 days
Daily Burn Rate: $112.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: ALAN SHEPARD; LINE 2 - A ITEMS MSFSC FUNDING
Place of Performance
Location: PORTLAND, MULTNOMAH County, OREGON, 97217
State: Oregon Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.7 million to CASCADE GENERAL, LLC for work described as: ALAN SHEPARD; LINE 2 - A ITEMS MSFSC FUNDING Key points: 1. Contract awarded for ship building and repair services. 2. Cascade General, LLC secured the contract. 3. The award was made under full and open competition. 4. The contract value is $11,657,654. 5. The period of performance is 104 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $11.6M appears reasonable for ship repair services, though a direct comparison is difficult without specific scope details. The firm fixed-price structure suggests a clear understanding of costs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and ensures fair market value.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers are likely receiving a fair price for the services rendered.
Public Impact
Ensures readiness of naval assets through essential repair services. Supports maritime industry jobs in Oregon. Provides critical infrastructure maintenance for national defense.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited contract duration (104 days) may necessitate future competitive actions.
- Specific details on the 'exclusion of sources' are not provided, warranting further review.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Firm fixed-price contract type.
- Awarded to a single contractor, potentially indicating specialized capabilities.
Sector Analysis
The shipbuilding and repair sector is vital for national security and economic activity. This contract falls within the broader defense industrial base, with spending benchmarks varying significantly based on vessel type and repair complexity.
Small Business Impact
While this specific award went to Cascade General, LLC, the broader shipbuilding and repair sector often involves a network of subcontractors, some of which may be small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation in this particular contract's execution.
Oversight & Accountability
The use of full and open competition suggests a standard procurement process. Oversight would focus on contract performance, adherence to specifications, and timely delivery of services.
Related Government Programs
- Ship Building and Repairing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for reduced competition due to source exclusion.
- Short contract duration may lead to follow-on contracts.
- Lack of detailed scope of work for precise value assessment.
- Need to verify small business participation.
Tags
ship-building-and-repairing, department-of-defense, or, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.7 million to CASCADE GENERAL, LLC. ALAN SHEPARD; LINE 2 - A ITEMS MSFSC FUNDING
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CASCADE GENERAL, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-01-02. End: 2008-04-15.
What was the specific reason for excluding certain sources in the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' process, and did this exclusion impact the final price?
The exclusion of sources typically occurs when specific technical requirements, security clearances, or unique capabilities are necessary, limiting the pool of eligible bidders. While intended to ensure suitability, such exclusions can sometimes reduce competition, potentially impacting price discovery. A review of the justification for exclusion is needed to assess its effect on the final award price and overall value for money.
How does the $11.6M contract value compare to similar ship repair contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy in the same fiscal year?
Benchmarking this $11.6M contract against similar ship repair awards requires access to a broader dataset of contracts with comparable scope, vessel types, and repair complexity. Without this comparative data, it's challenging to definitively assess if the price represents excellent, good, or fair value. Factors like the specific shipyard's capabilities and location also influence pricing.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness of this ship repair contract and ensure successful completion within the 104-day timeframe?
Effectiveness is typically measured by adherence to the Statement of Work (SOW), meeting quality standards for repairs, timely completion within the 104-day period, and overall vessel operational readiness post-repair. The Department of the Navy would likely have specific inspection and acceptance criteria to validate the quality and completeness of the work performed.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Ship and Boat Building › Ship Building and Repairing
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › NON-NUCLEAR SHIP REPAIR
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N4044208R3003
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Vigor Industrial LLC (UEI: 153727818)
Address: 5555 N CHANNEL AVE BLDG 71, PORTLAND, OR, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,657,654
Exercised Options: $11,657,654
Current Obligation: $11,657,654
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-01-02
Current End Date: 2008-04-15
Potential End Date: 2008-04-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2008-05-23
More Contracts from Cascade General, LLC
- Preservation and Repair of Tanks, Hull, Freeboard, Emory S. Land (AS-39), Psns & IMF, Bremerton, WA — $36.1M (Department of Defense)
- Prepare for and Accomplish the Overhaul and Drydocking of the Ex-Uss Paul Foster (EDD-964) — $25.8M (Department of Defense)
- Dredge Essayons Repowering — $21.8M (Department of Defense)
- USS Emory S. Land Restricted Availability 19 October 2009 Through 16 March 2010 — $21.8M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)