Navy awards $2M contract for water intrusion services to Belt Built Contracting, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,040,313 ($2.0M)

Contractor: Belt Built Contracting, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-04-17

End Date: 2026-02-28

Contract Duration: 1,048 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: B1703 WATER INTRUSION

Place of Performance

Location: PATUXENT RIVER, SAINT MARYS County, MARYLAND, 20670

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $2.0 million to BELT BUILT CONTRACTING, LLC for work described as: B1703 WATER INTRUSION Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the scope of work, though specific benchmarks are unavailable. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of nearly two years indicates a sustained need for these services. 4. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 5. The contractor, Belt Built Contracting, LLC, is relatively new to federal contracting. 6. Services are geographically focused within Maryland.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2,040,313 for water intrusion services over approximately two years is difficult to benchmark without more detailed scope information. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the costs involved. Comparing this to similar large-scale building maintenance contracts, the per-year cost seems within a plausible range for specialized construction services. Further analysis would require understanding the specific remediation and prevention measures included in the contract.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which indicates that while the competition was broad, specific sources may have been excluded based on predefined criteria. The number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation generally implies a robust competitive environment. This approach aims to ensure fair access for qualified contractors and potentially drive down prices through market forces.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential bidders, increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and innovative solutions.

Public Impact

Naval facilities in Maryland will benefit from improved building integrity and reduced water damage. Services include the prevention and remediation of water intrusion, crucial for maintaining infrastructure. The geographic impact is concentrated within the state of Maryland, likely supporting local Navy installations. The contract supports the construction sector workforce, potentially creating or sustaining jobs for skilled tradespeople.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited track record of the contractor in federal space.
  • The specific nature of 'water intrusion' can be complex and require specialized expertise.
  • Potential for unforeseen issues in older infrastructure leading to scope creep if not managed tightly.

Positive Signals

  • Firm fixed-price contract limits cost uncertainty.
  • Full and open competition suggests a competitive award process.
  • Contract duration indicates a recognized and ongoing need for the services.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector, particularly for institutional and commercial buildings, is a significant area of federal spending. This contract falls under building maintenance and repair, a critical component of managing government real property. Federal spending in this area often involves specialized services to ensure the longevity and operational readiness of facilities. Benchmarking against similar construction and maintenance contracts for government facilities would provide further context on value.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data does not indicate any subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal for this specific award. However, the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors if it aligns with their project execution strategy, though this is not explicitly mandated.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is subject to standard federal procurement oversight. As a firm-fixed-price contract, oversight will focus on ensuring the contractor meets the defined scope of work and quality standards. The Department of the Navy's contracting office is responsible for administration and oversight. Transparency is maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

  • Base Operations Support Services
  • Facilities Maintenance and Repair
  • Construction Services
  • Building Envelope Services

Risk Flags

  • Contractor's limited federal contracting history.
  • Potential for scope creep in complex building repair scenarios.

Tags

construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction, maryland, delivery-order, facilities-maintenance

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $2.0 million to BELT BUILT CONTRACTING, LLC. B1703 WATER INTRUSION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BELT BUILT CONTRACTING, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-04-17. End: 2026-02-28.

What is the specific scope of work for 'water intrusion' services under this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for 'water intrusion' services. Typically, such contracts can encompass a range of activities including inspection, diagnosis, repair of leaks, waterproofing, sealant application, drainage system maintenance, and preventative measures to protect building structures from water damage. The exact services would be outlined in the contract's statement of work (SOW), which is not included in the provided summary data. Understanding the SOW is crucial for a precise assessment of value and performance.

How does Belt Built Contracting, LLC's experience compare to other contractors performing similar services for the Navy?

Belt Built Contracting, LLC appears to be a relatively new entity in the federal contracting landscape, with limited historical data available in public databases. Without a substantial track record of successfully completed federal contracts, it is challenging to directly compare their experience and performance against established contractors who have a long history of delivering similar water intrusion or construction services. Agencies often assess past performance as a key factor in source selection, and a limited history might present a perceived risk, although it does not preclude a contractor from performing well.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for water intrusion services?

While firm-fixed-price (FFP) contracts are generally favored for controlling costs, risks can still arise. For water intrusion services, unforeseen complexities in existing structures could lead to disputes over scope or require change orders, potentially increasing the final cost if not managed meticulously. The contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which could incentivize them to cut corners on quality if not adequately monitored. Conversely, if the scope is underestimated by the government, the contractor might seek to renegotiate or deliver a reduced scope, leading to potential performance issues. Robust government oversight of work quality and adherence to the SOW is critical.

What is the historical spending pattern for water intrusion services by the Department of the Navy?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for 'water intrusion' services specifically by the Department of the Navy requires access to comprehensive federal procurement data over multiple fiscal years. General searches for related categories like 'building maintenance,' 'construction,' or 'facilities repair' reveal significant and consistent spending. However, isolating the exact expenditure solely on 'water intrusion' is difficult without specific category codes or detailed contract descriptions. The Navy, managing a vast portfolio of aging infrastructure, likely dedicates substantial resources annually to address such issues across its numerous installations.

What are the implications of 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' for price discovery?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' (FOCAES) designation implies that the solicitation was made available to all responsible prospective sources, but certain sources were excluded based on specific, documented reasons (e.g., national security, specific technical capabilities not met). This approach aims to balance broad competition with the need to ensure only qualified and appropriate contractors participate. While it's more competitive than a sole-source award, the exclusion of certain entities could theoretically limit the number of bids received compared to unrestricted full and open competition, potentially impacting the degree of price reduction achieved through bidding.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N4008019R0001

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2138 ESPEY CT, CROFTON, MD, 21114

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,040,313

Exercised Options: $2,040,313

Current Obligation: $2,040,313

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N4008023D1120

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-04-17

Current End Date: 2026-02-28

Potential End Date: 2026-02-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-08

More Contracts from Belt Built Contracting, LLC

View all Belt Built Contracting, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending