DoD's $13.8M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,862,797 ($13.9M)

Contractor: Techflow Mission Support, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-07-01

End Date: 2023-06-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $38.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: LBOS OY1 FUNDING TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: PATUXENT RIVER, SAINT MARYS County, MARYLAND, 20670

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.9 million to TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC for work described as: LBOS OY1 FUNDING TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Contract value of $13.8M for facilities support services represents a significant investment in operational readiness. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust market for these services. 3. The contract duration of 364 days indicates a need for ongoing, sustained support. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor, potentially stabilizing costs. 5. The specific NAICS code (561210) points to a focus on general facilities management. 6. Maryland location suggests a concentration of defense facilities or support infrastructure in the region.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.8M for a one-year period of facilities support services appears reasonable given the scope of general facilities management. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facilities support services within the Department of Defense is crucial for a definitive value assessment. Without specific per-unit cost data or detailed service breakdowns, a precise comparison is challenging, but the overall award amount aligns with the typical scale of such contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The process likely involved a solicitation where interested parties could submit proposals, and the award was made to the offeror best meeting the government's requirements. The level of competition is generally positive for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve service quality, ensuring that government funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its personnel, who rely on well-maintained facilities for operational effectiveness. Services delivered include general facilities support, crucial for the day-to-day functioning of military installations. The geographic impact is concentrated in Maryland, where the facilities requiring support are located. Workforce implications include potential job creation for skilled trades and support staff managed by TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen facility issues arise beyond the scope of the fixed-price contract.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities support could pose a risk if performance falters.
Ensuring consistent quality of services across all managed facilities requires diligent oversight.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract structure incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost control.
Full and open competition suggests a strong pool of qualified bidders, potentially leading to higher quality service.
The award to TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC indicates they met the government's stringent requirements for this service.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, is a broad sector encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and grounds. This includes services like janitorial, security, landscaping, and general maintenance. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, particularly for its vast real estate holdings. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale facilities management contracts awarded by various federal agencies, often running into millions of dollars annually.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded under full and open competition and there is no indication of a small business set-aside. Therefore, the direct impact on small business set-asides is minimal. However, TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC, as the prime contractor, may engage small businesses for subcontracting opportunities to fulfill specific service requirements. The extent of subcontracting to small businesses will depend on the prime contractor's strategy and the specific needs of the facilities supported.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration office within the Department of the Navy. Performance monitoring, quality assurance checks, and invoice review are standard accountability measures. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support
Facilities Maintenance Services
Logistics and Support Services
Government Contracting

Risk Flags

Contractor performance risk
Potential for cost overruns if scope expands
Dependence on contractor's resource availability

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.9 million to TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC. LBOS OY1 FUNDING TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-07-01. End: 2023-06-30.

What is the track record of TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC in performing similar facilities support contracts for the federal government?

A thorough review of TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC's contract history would be necessary to assess their track record. This would involve examining past performance evaluations, any awards or penalties received, and the scale and complexity of previous facilities support contracts they have managed. Data from contract databases like FPDS-NG or SAM.gov can provide insights into their award history, including contract values, agencies served, and contract types. Understanding their experience with firm-fixed-price contracts and their ability to manage services within defined budgets is crucial for evaluating their suitability for this current award.

How does the awarded amount of $13.8M compare to the average cost of similar facilities support contracts within the Department of Defense?

To benchmark the $13.8M award, one would need to analyze a dataset of similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense over a comparable period. Key comparison points would include contract duration, scope of services (e.g., janitorial, maintenance, security), geographic location, and the specific military branch or agency. If this contract is for a one-year duration and covers a broad range of general facilities support, the $13.8M figure should be compared against the average annual cost of similar contracts. A higher or lower value could indicate differences in service intensity, facility size, or market competitiveness. Without access to a comprehensive database of comparable contracts, a precise comparison is difficult, but the figure appears substantial, suggesting a significant scope of services or a large facility footprint.

What are the primary performance risks associated with this firm-fixed-price contract for facilities support?

The primary performance risk for the government in a firm-fixed-price contract is that the contractor may cut corners on quality or service delivery to maximize profit, especially if unforeseen issues arise that increase their costs. For TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC, the risk lies in accurately estimating all costs associated with providing comprehensive facilities support for the full duration of the contract. If unexpected maintenance needs, labor cost increases, or supply chain disruptions occur, the contractor bears the financial burden. The government's risk is mitigated by robust performance standards and quality assurance surveillance, but ensuring the contractor maintains adequate staffing and resources throughout the contract term is critical.

What is the expected effectiveness of TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC in delivering facilities support services based on the contract terms?

The expected effectiveness of TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC hinges on their ability to meet the performance standards and service level agreements outlined in the contract. As a firm-fixed-price award under full and open competition, the expectation is that they possess the capability and resources to deliver high-quality services efficiently. The contract's success will be measured by factors such as facility uptime, response times to maintenance requests, adherence to safety protocols, and overall client satisfaction from the Department of the Navy. Regular performance reviews and quality assurance checks by the government will be instrumental in ensuring these services are delivered effectively throughout the contract period.

How has federal spending on facilities support services, particularly within the Department of Defense, trended in recent years?

Federal spending on facilities support services, including those managed by the Department of Defense, has generally remained substantial due to the extensive infrastructure the government maintains. Trends often reflect shifts in defense posture, base realignments, and the increasing reliance on private sector expertise for specialized services. In recent years, there has been a continued emphasis on optimizing facility operations for cost-efficiency and sustainability. Spending levels can fluctuate based on budget appropriations, major construction or renovation projects, and the strategic decisions regarding outsourcing versus in-house management of facilities. Analyzing historical spending data for NAICS code 561210 across the DoD would reveal specific trends and investment priorities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N6247018R3006

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 301 A STREET, IDAHO FALLS, ID, 83402

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,862,797

Exercised Options: $13,862,797

Current Obligation: $13,862,797

Actual Outlays: $5,580

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6247021D0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline