Dod's $19.8M Facilities Support Contract Awarded to Techflow Mission Support, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,833,344 ($19.8M)

Contractor: Techflow Mission Support, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2014-02-26

End Date: 2015-03-31

Contract Duration: 398 days

Daily Burn Rate: $49.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF OPTION YEAR 4 FFP WORK

Place of Performance

Location: CAMP LEJEUNE, ONSLOW County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28547

State: North Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.8 million to TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF OPTION YEAR 4 FFP WORK Key points: 1. The contract value represents a significant investment in facilities support services for the Department of the Navy. 2. TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC secured this award through a competitive process. 3. The contract's firm-fixed-price structure aims to provide cost certainty. 4. The duration of the contract is approximately 13 months. 5. The award falls under facilities support services, a critical operational category. 6. The contract was awarded as a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this specific delivery order is challenging without knowing the scope of services and the overall contract it falls under. However, the award amount of $19.8 million for a 13-month period suggests a substantial operational budget. Further analysis would require comparing the per-unit costs of specific services (e.g., maintenance, janitorial, security) against industry benchmarks and similar government contracts to determine if the pricing is competitive and reflects good value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a broad solicitation process where all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 12 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A competitive environment generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition indicates that taxpayer dollars are likely being used efficiently, as multiple companies vied to provide the best value, driving down costs and improving service quality.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from essential facilities support services, ensuring operational readiness. Personnel at the Navy facility will experience maintained and improved infrastructure. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and support services sector. Services are delivered within North Carolina, impacting the local economy.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The specific details of the services provided are not fully elaborated in the provided data, making a comprehensive risk assessment difficult.
The contract's duration of approximately 13 months may necessitate future re-competition, leading to potential transition costs and service interruptions if not managed proactively.

Positive Signals

The award was made under a full and open competition, suggesting a thorough vetting of potential contractors.
The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability for the government.
The existence of 12 bidders indicates a competitive market for these services.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services is a broad category within the services sector, encompassing a wide range of activities from building maintenance and repair to custodial services and groundskeeping. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services across its numerous installations. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the total federal expenditure on facilities management across agencies, as well as the average contract values for similar service scopes and durations.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract, nor does it detail subcontracting plans. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem. However, the 'Full and Open Competition' nature suggests that small businesses were eligible to bid, and if they were among the 12 bidders, they had an opportunity to secure this work.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, though detailed performance metrics and oversight reports may not always be publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support (BOS)
Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Government Facilities Maintenance
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep if not clearly defined.
Contractor performance risk.
Dependence on specific contractor capabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.8 million to TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF OPTION YEAR 4 FFP WORK

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-02-26. End: 2015-03-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the Department of the Navy?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the Department of the Navy requires access to comprehensive federal procurement data over several fiscal years. Generally, the Navy, like other branches of the Department of Defense, allocates substantial resources to maintaining its vast infrastructure. This spending fluctuates based on infrastructure needs, modernization efforts, and budget appropriations. Trends often show a consistent demand for services such as maintenance, repair, custodial, and security, with contract values varying based on the size and complexity of the facilities. Benchmarking this specific $19.8 million award against historical averages for similar scope contracts would provide context on whether this represents a typical, elevated, or reduced investment for comparable facilities support.

How does TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC's track record influence the assessment of this contract's risk?

Assessing the risk associated with TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC requires a review of their past performance on similar government contracts. Key indicators include their history of meeting deadlines, delivering quality services, adhering to budgets, and compliance with contract terms. A contractor with a proven track record of successful project completion and positive past performance reviews generally presents lower risk. Conversely, a history of performance issues, contract disputes, or quality deficiencies would elevate the perceived risk. Without specific data on TECHFLOW MISSION SUPPORT, LLC's performance history, it is prudent to assume a moderate level of risk, which is standard for any new contract award, and to rely on the government's oversight mechanisms to mitigate potential issues.

What are the potential implications of the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award type?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award type is a specific procurement method that allows for broad competition but may involve excluding certain sources based on pre-defined criteria, often related to specific capabilities or existing contract vehicles. In this case, it implies that while the competition was open to all eligible responsible sources, there might have been reasons to exclude others, perhaps due to the nature of the requirement or the existing contract structure. The fact that 12 bidders participated suggests that the exclusion criteria did not unduly limit the competitive pool. This method aims to balance the benefits of open competition with the need for specific requirements or efficiencies, potentially leading to a balance between cost savings and tailored solutions.

How does the firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type affect value for money and contractor risk?

The Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract type is generally favored by the government for its cost certainty. Under an FFP contract, the contractor agrees to a set price for a defined scope of work, regardless of the actual costs incurred. This shifts the risk of cost overruns from the government to the contractor. For value for money, FFP contracts can be advantageous when the scope of work is well-defined and stable, as it incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently to maximize profit. However, if the scope is subject to change or unforeseen complexities arise, the contractor may build in higher contingency costs, potentially leading to a less competitive initial price. The contractor's incentive is to perform the work at or below the fixed price.

What is the typical market size for federal facilities support services?

The federal government is one of the largest consumers of facilities support services globally, managing an extensive portfolio of buildings, grounds, and infrastructure. The market size for these services is substantial, encompassing a wide array of needs from routine maintenance and janitorial services to specialized technical support and groundskeeping. Annual federal spending on facilities management and related services runs into the tens of billions of dollars across all agencies. This includes contracts for operating and maintaining military bases, government office buildings, research facilities, and more. The demand is consistent due to the continuous need to preserve and operate government assets, making it a significant and stable sector for service providers.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N4008508R8463

Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Techflow, Inc. (UEI: 014125442)

Address: 301 A STREET, IDAHO FALLS, ID, 83402

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,833,344

Exercised Options: $19,833,344

Current Obligation: $19,833,344

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N4008510D0213

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline