DoD's $21.2M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to Rogers, Lovelock & Fritz, Inc. for Maryland Operations

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,243,114 ($21.2M)

Contractor: Rogers, Lovelock & Fritz, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-11-03

End Date: 2020-12-30

Contract Duration: 4,075 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 25

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FUND ACRN AA

Place of Performance

Location: ANDREWS AFB, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20762

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $21.2 million to ROGERS, LOVELOCK & FRITZ, INC. for work described as: FUND ACRN AA Key points: 1. Contract value of $21.2 million over 11 years suggests a significant, long-term need for engineering services. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The duration of the contract (4075 days) is substantial, requiring careful performance monitoring. 5. The contractor, Rogers, Lovelock & Fritz, Inc., has secured a large award, indicating a strong track record or specialized capabilities. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330 points to specialized engineering services within the defense sector. 7. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, highlighting its specific requirements within the DoD. 8. The presence of 25 bids suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

Benchmarking the value of this $21.2 million contract requires more granular data on the specific engineering services provided. However, the duration of over 11 years for a firm-fixed-price contract suggests a potentially stable and predictable cost structure. The fact that it was awarded under full and open competition with 25 bidders could indicate that the pricing achieved was competitive. Without specific deliverables or labor rates, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive landscape is a positive indicator.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 25 bids indicates a robust level of competition for these engineering services. A higher number of bidders generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government, as contractors vie to win the award.

Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition for this contract suggests that taxpayer dollars were likely used efficiently, as multiple firms competed to offer their services at the best possible price.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Navy and potentially other entities within the Department of Defense requiring specialized engineering expertise. The services delivered are engineering services, likely encompassing design, analysis, consulting, and project management related to defense infrastructure or systems. The geographic impact is centered in Maryland, where the contractor is located and likely where the services are performed or managed. The contract supports a workforce of engineers and technical professionals employed by Rogers, Lovelock & Fritz, Inc.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration (over 11 years) could lead to scope creep or evolving requirements that may not be optimally priced over time.
Lack of specific detail on the engineering services provided makes it difficult to assess if the $21.2M represents optimal value.
The contract is not set aside for small businesses, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller specialized firms.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition with 25 bidders, indicating a competitive pricing environment.
Firm Fixed Price contract type shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor.
The significant contract value suggests the contractor possesses specialized expertise highly valued by the Department of the Navy.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. The defense sector represents a substantial market for engineering firms, particularly those with security clearances and experience in complex government projects. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale engineering service contracts awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies for similar types of support, considering factors like contract duration, scope, and geographic location.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The large value and nature of the services may lend themselves to larger, established firms. The absence of small business considerations in the award details means there's no direct positive impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific contract's structure, though the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price structure, which incentivizes the contractor to manage costs effectively. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award data being publicly available. Depending on the nature of the services, an Inspector General may have jurisdiction for audits and investigations into fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Engineering Services Contracts
Navy Professional Services Awards
Federal Engineering Consulting Contracts
Long-Term Government Service Contracts
Maryland Federal Contracts

Risk Flags

Long contract duration
Lack of specific service details
No small business set-aside noted

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $21.2 million to ROGERS, LOVELOCK & FRITZ, INC.. FUND ACRN AA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ROGERS, LOVELOCK & FRITZ, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-11-03. End: 2020-12-30.

What is the specific nature of the engineering services provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Engineering Services' under NAICS code 541330. This broad category typically encompasses a wide range of activities, including architectural, mechanical, electrical, civil, and aerospace engineering. For this specific contract with the Department of the Navy, it could involve design, analysis, testing, consultation, and project management related to naval infrastructure, weapon systems, or operational platforms. Without further details from the contract's statement of work, the precise services remain unspecified, making it difficult to ascertain the exact technical scope and deliverables.

How does the $21.2 million value compare to similar engineering service contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy?

Comparing the $21.2 million value requires context regarding the duration and scope. This contract spans over 11 years (4075 days), making its annual value approximately $1.9 million. The Department of the Navy awards numerous engineering service contracts, ranging from small, specialized task orders to large, multi-year programs. Contracts of this magnitude and duration are substantial but not uncommon for major defense procurements requiring long-term engineering support. A more precise comparison would involve analyzing contracts with similar NAICS codes, durations, and specific service requirements within the Navy's portfolio.

What are the key risks associated with a contract of this duration and value?

Key risks for a contract valued at $21.2 million over 11 years include: 1. **Scope Creep:** Requirements may evolve significantly over such a long period, potentially leading to unpriced or underpriced changes if not managed carefully. 2. **Technological Obsolescence:** The engineering solutions or technologies involved might become outdated before the contract concludes. 3. **Contractor Performance Degradation:** Maintaining consistent high performance over more than a decade can be challenging. 4. **Economic Fluctuations:** Unforeseen economic changes could impact the value or necessity of the services. 5. **Loss of Key Personnel:** The contractor might lose critical expertise over the contract's lifespan. The firm-fixed-price nature mitigates some financial risk for the government, but performance and relevance risks remain.

What does the high number of bidders (25) suggest about the contractor's position and the market for these services?

The high number of 25 bidders for this engineering services contract suggests a competitive market and potentially a well-defined, attractive requirement. It indicates that multiple firms possessed the capability and interest to pursue this work. For the winning contractor, Rogers, Lovelock & Fritz, Inc., securing this award against significant competition implies they likely offered a compelling technical solution and competitive price, or possess unique qualifications. For the Department of the Navy, it signifies a robust bidding process that likely yielded good value and demonstrated the availability of qualified providers in the market for these specific engineering services.

How has federal spending on engineering services (NAICS 541330) trended, and where does this contract fit?

Federal spending on engineering services (NAICS 541330) has historically been substantial, driven largely by the Department of Defense, transportation infrastructure projects, and research and development initiatives. Spending often fluctuates based on national priorities, infrastructure investment cycles, and defense budgets. This $21.2 million contract, awarded in 2009 and ending in 2020, represents a significant, long-term investment within the defense sector. Its value and duration place it among larger, more strategic engineering support contracts rather than smaller, project-specific engagements. Analyzing historical spending trends for this NAICS code would reveal the overall market size and the typical scale of contracts awarded by agencies like the Navy.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102

Offers Received: 25

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 145 LINCOLN AVE, WINTER PARK, FL, 32789

Business Categories: Category Business, Community Developed Corporation Owned Firm, Community Development Corporation, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $21,243,114

Exercised Options: $21,243,114

Current Obligation: $21,243,114

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline