DoD awards $3.97M contract for aircraft engine parts to General Electric, raising value-for-money questions
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,974,201 ($4.0M)
Contractor: General Electric Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2026-01-01
End Date: 2026-12-31
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.9K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: FY26 MPPST DO
Place of Performance
Location: LYNN, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01905
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $4.0 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: FY26 MPPST DO Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, established supplier suggests potential for higher pricing. 2. Lack of competition limits opportunities for cost savings and innovation. 3. Cost-plus-fixed-fee structure may incentivize higher spending without direct cost control. 4. Limited performance data available for this specific delivery order. 5. Contract falls within the established defense industrial base for aircraft components. 6. Oversight is crucial given the sole-source nature and fee-based payment structure.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this $3.97 million contract is challenging without comparable sole-source awards for similar aircraft engine parts. The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) pricing structure, while common for complex defense procurements, can lead to higher overall costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not managed diligently. The absence of competition means there's no market pressure to drive down prices, making it difficult to assess if the government is receiving optimal value for its investment. Further analysis of the fixed fee and estimated costs would be needed to provide a more precise value assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one vendor, General Electric Company, was solicited. This approach bypasses the standard competitive bidding process. While sole-source awards can be justified for unique capabilities or urgent needs, they inherently limit price discovery and can lead to higher costs for the government. The lack of multiple bidders means the Department of Defense did not benefit from the potential cost reductions and innovation that typically arise from a competitive environment.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competition. Without competing bids, there is less assurance that the price reflects the lowest possible cost for these aircraft engine parts.
Public Impact
The Department of the Navy benefits from the continued supply of critical aircraft engine parts, ensuring operational readiness. This contract supports the maintenance and sustainment of existing military aircraft fleets. The primary beneficiaries are the military personnel who rely on these aircraft for national defense missions. The contract's impact on the broader workforce is indirect, primarily supporting General Electric's manufacturing and supply chain operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition and potential cost savings.
- Cost-plus-fixed-fee structure may not incentivize maximum cost efficiency.
- Lack of transparency in detailed cost breakdown for the fixed fee.
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to specialized nature of aircraft engine parts.
Positive Signals
- Award to a known, established contractor with a track record in defense manufacturing.
- Ensures continued availability of critical components for military aircraft.
- Delivery order structure allows for phased procurement and management of specific needs.
Sector Analysis
The defense industrial base for aircraft engines and parts is a highly specialized and concentrated sector. Major players like General Electric dominate the market for advanced military aircraft propulsion systems. This contract fits within the broader category of aerospace manufacturing and sustainment, a critical component of national security spending. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish precisely due to the proprietary nature of engine components and the specific configurations required for military platforms.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to include a small business set-aside. General Electric Company is a large prime contractor. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans to small businesses within this specific delivery order. The absence of a set-aside or clear subcontracting goals could limit opportunities for small businesses to participate in this segment of the defense supply chain.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Given the sole-source nature and CPFF structure, rigorous oversight of cost accumulation and justification of the fixed fee is essential. Transparency regarding the specific engine parts and their necessity would be key. Inspector General involvement would typically be triggered by specific allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Engine Maintenance and Repair
- Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Procurement
- Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Contracts
- Aerospace Manufacturing and Parts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Cost-plus-fixed-fee pricing
- Lack of competition
- Potential for cost overruns
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, aircraft-engine-parts, general-electric-company, sole-source, cost-plus-fixed-fee, massachusetts, delivery-order, fy26, aircraft-engine-and-engine-parts-manufacturing
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $4.0 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. FY26 MPPST DO
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-01-01. End: 2026-12-31.
What is General Electric Company's track record with the Department of Defense for similar aircraft engine parts?
General Electric Company (GE) has a long-standing and extensive track record as a primary supplier of aircraft engines and related parts to the Department of Defense (DoD). They are a major contractor for various military aircraft platforms, including fighter jets, bombers, and transport planes. GE's history with the DoD involves numerous large-scale contracts for engine development, production, sustainment, and spare parts. While their overall performance is generally considered robust, specific contract details, including past performance on sole-source awards for engine components, would require deeper investigation into DoD procurement databases and performance reports. The sheer volume and criticality of their contributions suggest a deep integration into the defense supply chain, but also highlight the risks associated with sole-source reliance.
How does the cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) structure compare to other contract types for aircraft engine parts in terms of value?
The Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) contract type is often used when the exact costs are uncertain or difficult to estimate, such as in research and development or complex manufacturing where unforeseen issues may arise. For aircraft engine parts, CPFF can provide flexibility. However, compared to fixed-price contracts (like Firm-Fixed-Price or Fixed-Price Incentive), CPFF generally offers less incentive for the contractor to control costs, as the government agrees to pay all allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. This can lead to higher overall expenditures for the government. Value-for-money is typically considered better under competitive fixed-price arrangements where cost efficiency is directly rewarded. CPFF requires robust government oversight to manage costs effectively and ensure the fixed fee remains appropriate for the effort.
What are the primary risks associated with sole-source procurement of critical defense components like aircraft engine parts?
Sole-source procurement of critical defense components like aircraft engine parts carries several significant risks. Firstly, the absence of competition typically leads to higher prices than would be achieved in a competitive bidding process, resulting in reduced value for taxpayer money. Secondly, it can foster vendor lock-in, making it difficult and costly to switch suppliers in the future, even if performance issues arise or better alternatives become available. Thirdly, it reduces the incentive for the sole-source provider to innovate or improve efficiency, as they face no direct market pressure. Finally, it can create supply chain vulnerabilities if the single supplier experiences production issues, financial instability, or geopolitical disruptions. For critical components, this can directly impact military readiness.
What is the typical annual spending for aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing by the Department of Defense?
The Department of Defense (DoD) consistently allocates substantial funding towards aircraft engines and engine parts manufacturing, reflecting the critical nature of aviation in military operations. While precise annual figures fluctuate based on modernization programs, operational tempo, and specific platform needs, historical data indicates spending in the billions of dollars annually across all branches of the military. This includes funding for new engine development, production of engines for new aircraft, and sustainment contracts for maintaining and repairing existing engine fleets. The sector is dominated by a few large prime contractors, making individual contract awards, even those in the millions, part of a much larger, ongoing investment in air power.
How does the geographic location of the contractor (Massachusetts) potentially impact delivery timelines or costs for this DoD contract?
The geographic location of the contractor, General Electric Company in Massachusetts, can have several implications for this Department of Defense (DoD) contract. Proximity to major military installations or established defense hubs within the Northeast region could facilitate easier communication, site visits, and potentially faster delivery if the manufacturing facilities are well-connected to transportation networks. However, operating costs in Massachusetts, such as labor and overhead, might be higher compared to other regions, potentially influencing the overall cost structure of the contract, particularly under a cost-plus model. The specific impact on delivery timelines and costs would depend on the distribution network, the location of the end-user (e.g., naval air stations), and the efficiency of the logistics chain employed by GE.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1000 WESTERN AVE, LYNN, MA, 01905
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,803,140
Exercised Options: $11,803,140
Current Obligation: $3,974,201
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0042123G0004
IDV Type: BOA
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-01-01
Current End Date: 2026-12-31
Potential End Date: 2026-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-12
More Contracts from General Electric Company
- 200607!387702!1700!n00019!naval AIR Systems Command !N0001906C0088 !A!N! !N! ! !20060424!20090131!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01905!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000018238000!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !336412!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!u!j!1!001!n!1a!z!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! ! — $2.4B (Department of Defense)
- Adaptive Engine Transition Program (aetp) — $2.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200608!001069!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz06c0038 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051215!20101231!137488664!137488664!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1 Neumann WAY !cincinnati !oh!45215!15000!061!39!cincinnati !hamilton !ohio !+000177879422!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- 200210!004379!1700!AA427 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001901C0147 !A!N! !N!P00001 !20020508!20031130!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company Inc !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01910!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000060619860!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !2bjn!f414-Ge-400 !336412!E! !1! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1a!a!w!f! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.5B (Department of Defense)
- F414-GE-400 Engines — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)