DoD awards $3.39M engineering services task order to Greenfield Engineering Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,393,138 ($3.4M)

Contractor: Greenfield Engineering Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-01-28

End Date: 2026-01-27

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: NEW TASK ORDER UNDER AVIONICS GROUP TO SUPPORT PMA 261 H53E/K AND TECH PUBS.

Place of Performance

Location: PATUXENT RIVER, SAINT MARYS County, MARYLAND, 20670

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $3.4 million to GREENFIELD ENGINEERING CORPORATION for work described as: NEW TASK ORDER UNDER AVIONICS GROUP TO SUPPORT PMA 261 H53E/K AND TECH PUBS. Key points: 1. Task order supports critical H53E/K helicopter programs and technical publications. 2. Contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, allowing for flexibility in project scope. 3. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a competitive process. 4. Contract duration is one year, indicating a focused, short-term need. 5. The award is a Delivery Order under an existing IDIQ contract. 6. The task order is for engineering services, a vital component of defense readiness.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.39 million for a one-year engineering services task order appears reasonable given the scope of supporting H53E/K helicopter programs and technical publications. Benchmarking against similar engineering services contracts within the Department of Defense for specialized aviation support would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type allows for cost reimbursement plus a fixed fee, which can be appropriate for projects with evolving requirements, but requires careful oversight to manage costs effectively.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' basis. This indicates that while the competition was open, there might have been specific criteria or prior exclusions that narrowed the initial pool of potential bidders. The exact number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competitive environment was intended, which generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process, even with initial source exclusions, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through market forces. This approach helps prevent sole-source situations that could lead to inflated costs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Navy and the U.S. Marine Corps, who rely on the H53E/K helicopter fleet. Services delivered include essential engineering support and the creation/updating of technical publications for these aircraft. The geographic impact is primarily within the defense sector, supporting naval aviation readiness. Workforce implications include specialized engineering roles and technical writing positions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently.
The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type warrants further investigation to understand the rationale and potential impact on competition breadth.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical engineering support could pose a risk if not mitigated by strong performance monitoring.

Positive Signals

Awarding a task order under an existing IDIQ contract suggests a streamlined procurement process.
The focus on engineering services for a critical helicopter platform indicates alignment with core defense mission requirements.
The one-year duration allows for focused execution and reassessment of needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting defense aerospace. The market for specialized aerospace engineering services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of supporting complex platforms like the H53E/K. Spending in this sub-sector is driven by defense modernization, sustainment, and readiness requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within the broader DoD's aviation procurement and sustainment budgets.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary focus is on large business participation. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this specific task order, which is a common requirement for larger defense contracts and could represent missed opportunities for the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this task order will likely be managed by the Department of the Navy's Program Executive Office (PEO) for Unmanned Aviation and Strike Weapons (PMA-261), which oversees the H53 programs. Accountability measures would be tied to the Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract terms, performance metrics, and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, though detailed performance reports are typically internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

H53E/K Helicopter Program Support
Naval Aviation Maintenance and Sustainment
Defense Technical Publications
Aerospace Engineering Services Contracts
Department of Defense IDIQ Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF contract type.
Limited transparency on the specific rationale for 'exclusion of sources' in competition.
Lack of explicit small business subcontracting requirements noted in the award data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $3.4 million to GREENFIELD ENGINEERING CORPORATION. NEW TASK ORDER UNDER AVIONICS GROUP TO SUPPORT PMA 261 H53E/K AND TECH PUBS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GREENFIELD ENGINEERING CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-01-28. End: 2026-01-27.

What is Greenfield Engineering Corporation's track record with the Department of Defense, particularly on aviation support contracts?

Greenfield Engineering Corporation has a history of performing services for the Department of Defense. While specific details on their track record for H53E/K support are not provided in this data snippet, their selection for this task order suggests they possess relevant capabilities and have likely performed similar engineering or technical services for the DoD in the past. A deeper dive into their contract history, past performance reviews, and any reported issues would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment. Their ability to secure this task order under a competitive process implies a baseline level of qualification and experience deemed sufficient by the contracting agency.

How does the $3.39 million value compare to similar engineering support contracts for heavy-lift helicopters?

The $3.39 million value for a one-year task order supporting H53E/K programs and technical publications is within a typical range for specialized engineering services in the defense aerospace sector. However, a precise comparison requires benchmarking against contracts with similar scopes, durations, and complexity. Factors such as the specific technical challenges, the level of engineering expertise required, and the number of bidders influence pricing. Without access to a database of comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent, fair, or concerning value. The CPFF structure also means the final cost could vary based on actual effort expended.

What are the primary risks associated with this Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this specific task order?

The primary risk with a CPFF contract is the potential for cost overruns, as the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs plus a fixed fee. If project requirements are not clearly defined or if scope creep occurs without proper management, costs can escalate beyond initial estimates. For this task order, risks include unforeseen technical complexities in supporting the H53E/K platforms or in developing/updating technical publications, which could increase labor hours and material costs. Effective oversight by the Navy is crucial to monitor expenditures, ensure costs are reasonable and allocable, and manage the scope to prevent uncontrolled cost growth beyond the fixed fee.

How effective is the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method in ensuring optimal value for taxpayers in this context?

The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method aims to balance broad market access with specific requirements. It suggests that while the competition was open, certain sources were initially excluded based on predefined criteria (e.g., capability, past performance, security clearances). This can lead to a more focused competition among qualified vendors, potentially resulting in better-tailored solutions and competitive pricing. However, if the exclusions were too restrictive or not well-justified, it could limit the number of bidders and potentially reduce the competitive pressure, impacting price discovery. The effectiveness for taxpayers hinges on whether the exclusions were necessary and if sufficient competition remained.

What is the historical spending trend for engineering services related to the H53E/K program by the Department of the Navy?

Historical spending data for engineering services specifically tied to the H53E/K program by the Department of the Navy would reveal trends in investment for sustainment, upgrades, and operational support. Analyzing this data over several fiscal years would indicate whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and whether it aligns with the program's lifecycle stage (e.g., sustainment vs. new development). Significant fluctuations might signal changes in program priorities, technological advancements, or emerging sustainment challenges. This context is vital for understanding the long-term financial commitment and resource allocation for the H53E/K fleet.

Are there any performance concerns or positive performance indicators associated with Greenfield Engineering Corporation on previous DoD contracts?

Assessing Greenfield Engineering Corporation's performance requires accessing historical contract data, including past performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS reports) and any documented issues or commendations. Without this specific data, it's impossible to definitively state their performance record. However, their ability to win this task order suggests they meet the minimum performance requirements set by the DoD. Positive indicators might include consistent on-time delivery, adherence to budget, high-quality deliverables, and strong communication. Conversely, concerns could involve missed deadlines, cost overruns, or quality deficiencies. A thorough review of their past performance is essential for a complete risk assessment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N0042124R0007

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 20319 BEAUVUE CT, LEONARDTOWN, MD, 20650

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,874,479

Exercised Options: $3,445,268

Current Obligation: $3,393,138

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0042125D0026

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline