Naval Air Warfare Center awards $16.9M engineering services contract to Compliance Corporation for technical support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,966,726 ($17.0M)

Contractor: Compliance Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2001-10-01

End Date: 2007-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,190 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200206!008144!1700!A8102 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042101C0400 !A!N! !N! !20011001!20020930!070186812!070186812!070186812!N!COMPLIANCE CORPORATION !21617 SOUTH ESSEX DRIVE !LEXINGTON PARK !MD!20653!69525!037!24!ST. INIGOES !ST. MARY S !MARYLAND !+000000000000!N!N!000003301143!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!U!2!001!K! !C!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!C! ! ! !B!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT INIGOES, ST. MARY'S County, MARYLAND, 20684

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.0 million to COMPLIANCE CORPORATION for work described as: 200206!008144!1700!A8102 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042101C0400 !A!N! !N! !20011001!20020930!070186812!070186812!070186812!N!COMPLIANCE CORPORATION !21617 SOUTH ESSEX DRIVE !LEXINGTON PARK !MD!20653!69525!037!24!ST. INIGOES !ST. M… Key points: 1. Contract provides essential engineering and technical services to support naval aviation warfare capabilities. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract suggests a need for sustained support in a critical defense area. 4. The awarded amount represents a significant investment in maintaining and advancing naval air systems. 5. The contractor, Compliance Corporation, has a track record in providing specialized technical services. 6. The contract's focus on engineering services highlights the importance of technical expertise in defense operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $16.9 million over approximately two years appears reasonable for specialized engineering and technical services in the defense sector. Benchmarking against similar contracts for engineering support to naval aviation programs would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, given the duration and scope, the pricing is likely competitive due to the full and open competition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which implies that the opportunity was broadly advertised, and multiple bidders were likely considered. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensures that the government receives offers from a wide range of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award suggests that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently, as multiple companies vied for the contract, likely driving down costs through competitive bidding.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Naval Air Warfare Center and the U.S. Navy, receiving critical engineering and technical support. Services delivered include engineering and technical support essential for naval aviation systems and operations. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around naval air facilities, particularly in Maryland where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include the employment of engineers, technicians, and support staff by Compliance Corporation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if initial requirements are not clearly defined.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical technical services could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Contract duration indicates a stable need for the services, allowing for focused expertise development.
The contractor's specialization in engineering services aligns with the contract's requirements.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader aerospace and defense industry. The market for defense engineering services is substantial, driven by the continuous need for research, development, testing, and sustainment of complex military systems. Spending in this area is often characterized by long-term contracts and specialized expertise, with significant government investment to maintain technological superiority.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans was not explicitly detailed in the provided data. However, the 'full and open competition' award type suggests that the primary contract was not exclusively set aside for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were mandated or utilized for small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the Naval Air Warfare Center's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be established through performance metrics and reporting requirements outlined in the contract. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance details may be sensitive.

Related Government Programs

Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Contracts
Department of Defense Engineering Services
Aerospace Engineering Support Contracts
Naval Warfare Technology Development

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues over a long contract duration.
Need for continuous monitoring of technical relevance and evolving requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.0 million to COMPLIANCE CORPORATION. 200206!008144!1700!A8102 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042101C0400 !A!N! !N! !20011001!20020930!070186812!070186812!070186812!N!COMPLIANCE CORPORATION !21617 SOUTH ESSEX DRIVE !LEXINGTON PARK !MD!20653!69525!037!24!ST. INIGOES !ST. MARY S !MARYLAND !+000000000000!N!N!000003301143!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COMPLIANCE CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2001-10-01. End: 2007-09-30.

What is the specific nature of the engineering and technical services provided under this contract?

The contract, N0042101C0400, awarded to Compliance Corporation, is for Engineering Technical Services. While the data specifies the NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services), the precise breakdown of services is not detailed. Generally, such contracts support the development, testing, integration, and sustainment of complex systems, including aircraft, weapons, and related technologies. This could encompass areas like systems engineering, software engineering, test and evaluation, logistics support, and program management, all crucial for maintaining the operational readiness and technological advancement of naval air assets.

How does the contract value compare to similar engineering support contracts within the Navy?

The contract value of approximately $16.9 million over its duration (October 1, 2001, to September 30, 2007, though the data shows an award date of 20020601 and an end date of 20020930, suggesting a potential discrepancy or modification) needs context. For specialized engineering services supporting naval aviation, this amount is moderate. Larger, more complex programs can run into hundreds of millions or billions. However, without knowing the exact scope and duration intended by the end date of 2007, a direct comparison is difficult. The key is that it was competitively procured, suggesting a fair market price for the defined scope.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a contract of this nature?

Key risks include performance deficiencies, where the contractor may fail to meet technical specifications or delivery timelines, impacting naval readiness. Cost overruns are another risk, particularly if the scope of work expands beyond initial estimates or if unforeseen technical challenges arise. There's also a dependency risk; the Navy relies on Compliance Corporation's expertise, and any disruption to their service could have operational consequences. Furthermore, ensuring continued compliance with evolving security and regulatory requirements is an ongoing risk management area for both the contractor and the government.

What is Compliance Corporation's track record in providing services to the Department of Defense?

Compliance Corporation, identified as the contractor, has been awarded this contract by the Department of the Navy. The data indicates they are located in Lexington Park, MD, which is geographically close to major naval commands like the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR). While this specific contract award suggests capability, a comprehensive track record assessment would involve reviewing their past performance on other government contracts, including customer satisfaction ratings, history of contract modifications, and any past performance issues or awards.

How does the contract's duration (2190 days) influence its overall value and risk?

The duration of 2190 days (approximately 6 years) suggests a long-term need for the engineering and technical services. This extended period allows for deeper integration of the contractor's expertise into naval programs and can lead to greater efficiencies and knowledge retention. For the government, it provides stability in support. However, a longer duration also increases the risk of technological obsolescence, changes in program requirements, and potential contractor performance degradation over time. Robust oversight and contract management are crucial to mitigate these risks throughout the contract's life.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED (NO)

Contractor Details

Address: 21617 SOUTH ESSEX DRIVE, LEXINGTON PARK, MD, 05

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,301,143

Current Obligation: $16,966,726

Timeline