DoD's $107M F414 Depot Component Support contract awarded to GE without competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $107,024,324 ($107.0M)

Contractor: General Electric Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-09-01

End Date: 2023-12-31

Contract Duration: 121 days

Daily Burn Rate: $884.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: F414 DEPOT COMPONENT SUPPORT PERFORMANCE BASED LOGISITICS

Place of Performance

Location: LYNN, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01905

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $107.0 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: F414 DEPOT COMPONENT SUPPORT PERFORMANCE BASED LOGISITICS Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting price discovery and potentially increasing costs. 2. Performance-based logistics approach aims to ensure readiness and reduce downtime for critical aircraft engines. 3. High value suggests significant reliance on GE for specialized support of F414 engines. 4. Short duration (121 days) may indicate a bridge contract or a specific, time-bound support need. 5. Lack of competition raises questions about whether alternative providers could offer comparable services at a lower cost. 6. Focus on depot component support highlights the importance of maintenance and repair for operational readiness.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Benchmarking the value of this sole-source contract is challenging without competitive bids. The $107 million value over approximately four months suggests a high per-diem cost. While performance-based logistics can offer value through improved readiness, the absence of competition prevents a direct comparison to market rates or alternative providers. The contract's structure and pricing should be scrutinized to ensure it reflects fair market value, especially given the lack of a competitive bidding process.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one bidder, General Electric Company, was solicited. This approach is typically used when only one responsible source is available or when a compelling justification exists for not seeking competition. The lack of multiple bidders means there was no opportunity for price negotiation or comparison against other potential suppliers, which can lead to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive pressure. Without competing bids, it's difficult to ascertain if the government secured the best possible price for these essential depot component support services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Navy and potentially other F414 engine operators within the Department of Defense, ensuring operational readiness. Services delivered include depot-level component support, crucial for maintaining the functionality and longevity of F414 engines. Geographic impact is likely concentrated around naval aviation facilities and maintenance depots where F414 engines are serviced. Workforce implications may involve specialized technicians at GE's facilities and potentially within the Navy's maintenance commands.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and potentially increases costs for taxpayers.
  • Lack of transparency in the procurement process due to non-competitive award.
  • Short contract duration raises questions about long-term strategic planning for F414 component support.
  • High dollar value without competition warrants close scrutiny of cost-effectiveness.

Positive Signals

  • Performance-based logistics contract aims to improve engine readiness and reduce operational downtime.
  • Focus on depot component support ensures critical maintenance for advanced aircraft engines.
  • Award to General Electric, the original equipment manufacturer, suggests access to specialized expertise and parts.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on aircraft engine components. The market for specialized depot support for complex military engines like the F414 is often dominated by the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) due to proprietary knowledge, tooling, and certifications. Comparable spending benchmarks for such specialized support are difficult to establish publicly due to the proprietary nature of the services and the limited number of qualified providers.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. Furthermore, the prime contractor is General Electric Company, a large corporation. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within this specific award notice. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless GE actively engages small businesses for specialized support services not covered by this direct contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are embedded within the performance-based logistics framework, linking payment to achieved performance metrics. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

  • F414 Engine Maintenance and Repair Contracts
  • Department of the Navy Aircraft Component Support
  • Performance-Based Logistics Contracts
  • Sole-Source Defense Procurements

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • High dollar value without competitive bidding
  • Short contract duration

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, aircraft-engine-support, sole-source, performance-based-logistics, firm-fixed-price, general-electric, f414-engine, component-support, massachusetts, large-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $107.0 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. F414 DEPOT COMPONENT SUPPORT PERFORMANCE BASED LOGISITICS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $107.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-09-01. End: 2023-12-31.

What is General Electric Company's track record with sole-source contracts for F414 engine support?

General Electric Company (GE) is the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) for the F414 engine, which powers aircraft like the F/A-18 Super Hornet and the F-15EX Eagle II. As the OEM, GE possesses unique expertise, proprietary data, and specialized tooling essential for the maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) of these complex engines. Consequently, GE frequently receives sole-source or limited-competition contracts for F414 depot component support. While this ensures access to critical capabilities, it also means that the government relies heavily on GE's pricing and performance. Analyzing historical sole-source awards to GE for similar F414 support can provide context on pricing trends and performance expectations, though direct comparisons are often difficult due to varying contract scopes and durations.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar F414 support contracts awarded previously?

Comparing the $107 million value of this 121-day contract to previous F414 support contracts requires careful consideration of scope, duration, and contract type. This award represents a significant daily expenditure, approximately $884,000 per day. Previous contracts, whether sole-source or competitively awarded, may have had longer durations, broader scopes (e.g., including full engine overhauls versus component support), or different pricing structures (e.g., cost-plus vs. firm-fixed-price). Without access to detailed historical contract data and a clear understanding of the specific services included in each award, a precise value comparison is challenging. However, the magnitude of this award underscores the substantial investment required for maintaining the F414 engine fleet.

What are the primary risks associated with awarding a sole-source contract for critical engine component support?

The primary risk associated with awarding a sole-source contract for critical engine component support is the potential for inflated pricing due to the lack of competitive pressure. Without competing bids, the government may not achieve the best possible value for its expenditure. Another risk is vendor lock-in, where the government becomes overly dependent on a single supplier, limiting future flexibility and negotiation leverage. Furthermore, sole-source awards can reduce transparency in the procurement process, making it harder to justify costs to taxpayers. There's also a risk that innovation may be stifled, as there is less incentive for the sole provider to develop more cost-effective or efficient support methods when competition is absent.

How does the performance-based logistics (PBL) structure aim to ensure program effectiveness for F414 engine support?

The performance-based logistics (PBL) structure is designed to shift the focus from transactional support to achieving desired outcomes, such as engine readiness and availability. For F414 engine component support, this means the contract likely establishes specific performance metrics (e.g., turnaround times for repairs, component reliability rates, on-time delivery of parts) that General Electric must meet. Payments are then tied to the achievement of these metrics, incentivizing GE to proactively manage inventory, optimize maintenance processes, and ensure high levels of operational readiness. This approach aims to improve overall program effectiveness by ensuring the engines are available when needed, reducing unplanned downtime, and potentially lowering the total cost of ownership over the system's lifecycle.

What is the historical spending pattern for F414 engine support within the Department of the Navy?

Historical spending on F414 engine support within the Department of the Navy has been substantial, reflecting the critical role of these engines in naval aviation. The Navy operates a significant number of aircraft that rely on the F414, including the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet. Spending typically encompasses a range of activities, from routine maintenance and component repair to depot-level overhauls and spare parts procurement. Given the complexity and high operational tempo of naval aviation, consistent and significant investment in engine support is a recurring requirement. Awards for F414 support have often been sole-source or limited-competition due to GE's OEM status, leading to a pattern of substantial, ongoing expenditures directed towards ensuring the readiness of the F414 fleet.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1000 WESTERN AVE, LYNN, MA, 01905

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $107,024,324

Exercised Options: $107,024,324

Current Obligation: $107,024,324

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 7

Total Subaward Amount: $1,327,450

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0038321DZN01

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-09-01

Current End Date: 2023-12-31

Potential End Date: 2023-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-11-30

More Contracts from General Electric Company

View all General Electric Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending