DoD's $92.4M engine parts contract awarded to General Electric Company raises value concerns
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $92,437,965 ($92.4M)
Contractor: General Electric Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2021-05-01
End Date: 2021-08-31
Contract Duration: 122 days
Daily Burn Rate: $757.7K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: DELIVERY ORDER FOR POP 01 MAY 2021 THROUGH 31 AUG 2021
Place of Performance
Location: LYNN, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01905
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $92.4 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: DELIVERY ORDER FOR POP 01 MAY 2021 THROUGH 31 AUG 2021 Key points: 1. The contract's value appears high relative to its short duration, suggesting potential overpayment. 2. Lack of competition limits price discovery and may indicate a missed opportunity for cost savings. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts risk to the government, especially with potential for cost overruns. 4. Performance context is limited due to the short delivery period and lack of detailed metrics. 5. This contract falls within the aircraft engine and parts manufacturing sector, a critical defense industry. 6. The sole-source nature warrants scrutiny regarding the necessity of this specific award method.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's total value of $92.4 million over a 122-day period averages approximately $757,688 per day. This daily burn rate is exceptionally high and warrants further investigation. Without comparable contract data for similar engine parts or maintenance services, it is difficult to definitively benchmark the value. However, the short duration coupled with the substantial cost suggests a potential lack of cost-effectiveness or an inflated price. The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type, while providing cost certainty, means the government bears the risk if costs exceed the fixed price, which is concerning given the high daily expenditure.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded using the 'NOT COMPETED' method, indicating a sole-source procurement. The specific justification for this approach is not provided in the data. A sole-source award bypasses the competitive bidding process, which typically drives down prices and encourages innovation. Without competition, there is no direct market pressure to ensure the government receives the best possible price or terms. This raises questions about whether alternative suppliers were considered or if there were unique circumstances necessitating a non-competitive award.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition means taxpayers may not have benefited from the cost savings typically achieved through a bidding process. This could translate to higher overall defense spending than necessary for these critical engine parts.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Navy, ensuring operational readiness of aircraft. The services delivered involve the provision of aircraft engine parts, crucial for maintaining and repairing military aircraft. The geographic impact is primarily within Massachusetts, where the contract was awarded, and potentially extends to naval bases where the aircraft are deployed. Workforce implications include supporting jobs within General Electric Company's manufacturing and supply chain operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- High daily expenditure rate over a short period suggests potential overpricing.
- Sole-source award limits price discovery and competitive pressure.
- Firm-fixed-price contract shifts cost overrun risk to the government.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes assessing efficiency difficult.
- Absence of competition raises questions about market research and alternatives.
Positive Signals
- Contract awarded to a known entity (General Electric Company) with established capabilities in aircraft engines.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Ensures availability of critical engine parts for naval aviation readiness.
Sector Analysis
The aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing sector (NAICS 336412) is a vital component of the aerospace and defense industry. This sector is characterized by high barriers to entry, significant research and development costs, and stringent quality control requirements. Spending in this area is often driven by defense procurement needs, commercial aviation demand, and technological advancements. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without more specific part details, but the defense sector's reliance on specialized, high-performance components means contracts can be substantial. This contract fits within the broader defense procurement landscape for maintaining aging aircraft fleets and ensuring operational readiness.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a sole-source award to a large corporation, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses mentioned. This contract does not appear to contribute to the small business ecosystem through set-asides or mandated subcontracting goals. The focus is on fulfilling a direct need with a large, established prime contractor.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Defense's contracting and financial management systems. The Department of the Navy is the contracting agency. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature and the lack of publicly available detailed performance metrics or justifications for the award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected. Accountability relies on the contractual terms and the agency's internal oversight processes.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Aircraft Procurement
- Naval Aviation Maintenance and Repair
- Aircraft Engine Manufacturing
- Defense Logistics Agency Contracts
Risk Flags
- High Value, Short Duration
- Sole Source Award
- Lack of Competition
- Potential for Overpricing
- Limited Transparency
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, aircraft-engine-parts, manufacturing, sole-source, not-competed, firm-fixed-price, massachusetts, high-value, short-term
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $92.4 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. DELIVERY ORDER FOR POP 01 MAY 2021 THROUGH 31 AUG 2021
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $92.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-05-01. End: 2021-08-31.
What is the historical spending pattern for aircraft engine parts with General Electric Company by the Department of the Navy?
Analyzing historical spending patterns between the Department of the Navy and General Electric Company for aircraft engine parts is crucial for context. Without access to specific historical contract data, it's challenging to provide precise figures. However, General Electric is a major supplier to the U.S. military for aircraft engines and components. Past spending would likely show significant, multi-year contracts for engine production, spare parts, and maintenance services. The frequency and value of these contracts would depend on the specific aircraft platforms in the Navy's inventory that utilize GE engines. A review of historical data would help determine if the current $92.4 million for a short delivery period is an anomaly or part of a consistent, high-value procurement trend. It would also help assess if previous sole-source awards have been common for similar requirements or if competitive processes have yielded better value in the past.
How does the daily cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar aircraft engine parts?
Benchmarking the daily cost of this contract ($92.4 million over 122 days, averaging ~$757,688/day) against industry standards for similar aircraft engine parts is difficult without specific part identification and detailed market data. The aerospace and defense sector involves highly specialized, technologically advanced components where costs can vary dramatically based on complexity, materials, and certification requirements. General Electric is a leading manufacturer, and their pricing often reflects proprietary technology and extensive R&D investment. However, a daily expenditure of this magnitude, even for critical components, warrants scrutiny. Industry benchmarks for high-performance engine parts might range from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per part, depending on the specific item. The sheer volume or criticality of parts covered under this contract would need to be substantial to justify such a high daily burn rate. A lack of competitive bidding further complicates direct comparison, as market-driven pricing is absent.
What are the specific risks associated with a sole-source award for critical aircraft engine parts?
Sole-source awards for critical aircraft engine parts carry several significant risks. Firstly, the absence of competition means the government cannot leverage market forces to secure the best possible price, potentially leading to overpayment and inefficient use of taxpayer funds. Secondly, it can stifle innovation, as there is less incentive for the sole provider to improve efficiency or develop cost-saving alternatives when their position is guaranteed. Thirdly, it creates a dependency on a single supplier, which can be risky if that supplier experiences production issues, financial instability, or decides to significantly increase prices in the future. For critical components like aircraft engine parts, supply chain disruptions or quality control failures by the sole provider could have severe operational impacts on military readiness. The government's negotiating power is also diminished in a sole-source scenario.
What is the justification provided by the Department of the Navy for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?
The provided data indicates the contract was awarded under the 'NOT COMPETED' category, signifying a sole-source procurement. However, the specific justification or rationale behind this decision by the Department of the Navy is not included in the dataset. Typically, sole-source awards require a formal justification, often citing reasons such as urgency, unique capabilities of a single source, or the unavailability of comparable supplies or services from other sources. Without this official justification, it is impossible to assess the validity of the non-competitive award. Agencies are generally required to document and publicly justify sole-source procurements, especially for significant dollar amounts, to ensure transparency and accountability. Further investigation into the contract file or agency records would be necessary to uncover the official reasoning.
What performance metrics or deliverables are associated with this contract to ensure accountability?
The provided data for this contract does not include specific performance metrics, deliverables, or key performance indicators (KPIs). It only states the contract type as 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' and provides the delivery period (May 1, 2021, to August 31, 2021). For a contract of this magnitude ($92.4 million), detailed performance expectations are crucial for ensuring accountability and value for money. These would typically include specifications for the engine parts (quality, quantity, technical standards), delivery schedules, and potentially warranties or defect correction clauses. The firm-fixed-price nature implies the contractor is responsible for delivering the specified goods within the agreed price, but without defined metrics, it's challenging to objectively measure the contractor's performance or the government's satisfaction with the outcome. The lack of explicit performance data makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of this procurement.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1000 WESTERN AVE, LYNN, MA, 01905
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $92,437,965
Exercised Options: $92,437,965
Current Obligation: $92,437,965
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0038317DBG01
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-05-01
Current End Date: 2021-08-31
Potential End Date: 2021-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-02-07
More Contracts from General Electric Company
- 200607!387702!1700!n00019!naval AIR Systems Command !N0001906C0088 !A!N! !N! ! !20060424!20090131!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01905!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000018238000!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !336412!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!u!j!1!001!n!1a!z!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! ! — $2.4B (Department of Defense)
- Adaptive Engine Transition Program (aetp) — $2.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200608!001069!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz06c0038 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051215!20101231!137488664!137488664!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1 Neumann WAY !cincinnati !oh!45215!15000!061!39!cincinnati !hamilton !ohio !+000177879422!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- 200210!004379!1700!AA427 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001901C0147 !A!N! !N!P00001 !20020508!20031130!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company Inc !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01910!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000060619860!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !2bjn!f414-Ge-400 !336412!E! !1! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1a!a!w!f! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.5B (Department of Defense)
- F414-GE-400 Engines — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)