DoD awards $21.6M contract for fleet environmental training, with Science Applications International Corporation as prime
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $21,584,717 ($21.6M)
Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-09-29
End Date: 2026-09-28
Contract Duration: 1,460 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING OPERATION SUPPORT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND
Place of Performance
Location: NORFOLK, NORFOLK CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23551
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $21.6 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING OPERATION SUPPORT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized environmental training and operational support services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 4. Contract duration of four years provides stability for service delivery. 5. The award is for engineering services, aligning with the contractor's expertise. 6. This contract supports critical fleet readiness and environmental compliance for the U.S. Navy.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $21.6 million over four years for environmental training and operational support services for the U.S. Fleet Forces Command appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized government contracting. Benchmarking against similar large-scale environmental support contracts for military branches suggests that the pricing structure, given the scope and duration, is competitive. The firm-fixed-price nature of the award further indicates a commitment to cost control, as the contractor assumes the risk for cost overruns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specialized service. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, two offers in a niche area like fleet environmental training is not uncommon and suggests that the government received at least some competitive proposals.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition, even with two bidders, generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring that the government receives proposals from multiple qualified companies, fostering a more competitive pricing environment and reducing the risk of inflated costs.
Public Impact
U.S. Fleet Forces Command personnel will benefit from enhanced environmental training and operational support. Services delivered include environmental compliance, training program development, and operational readiness support. The geographic impact is primarily focused on naval operations and facilities within the United States. This contract supports a specialized workforce in environmental science and military operations support.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if training requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
- Dependence on contractor expertise could be a risk if key personnel depart.
- Ensuring consistent quality of training across all fleet units may require robust oversight.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive process.
- Long-term contract provides stability for service delivery and planning.
- Contractor's established presence in government services may indicate relevant experience.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting environmental compliance and operational readiness for a major federal agency. The market for government environmental consulting and support services is substantial, driven by regulatory requirements and the operational needs of defense and civilian agencies. Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is a significant player in this market, often competing for and winning large-scale contracts that require specialized technical and operational expertise.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. Given the prime contractor is Science Applications International Corporation, a large business, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. However, without specific subcontracting plans or set-aside provisions, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular award is likely limited unless proactively pursued by the prime.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance metrics and oversight activities are typically internal to the agency.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Compliance Services
- Military Training Programs
- Fleet Operations Support
- Defense Logistics Agency Contracts
- Naval Sea Systems Command Contracts
Risk Flags
- Contract duration is long (4 years), requiring sustained oversight.
- Fixed-price contract type may lead to higher initial bids to cover contractor risk.
- Competition level (2 bidders) is moderate, potentially limiting price negotiation.
Tags
environmental-services, training-services, department-of-defense, navy, fleet-forces-command, engineering-services, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, large-contract, operational-support, virginia
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $21.6 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING OPERATION SUPPORT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-09-29. End: 2026-09-28.
What is the track record of Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) in performing similar environmental training and operational support services for the Department of Defense?
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) has a substantial track record of providing a wide array of services to the Department of Defense (DoD), including environmental management, training, and operational support. They frequently secure large, complex contracts that require technical expertise, program management, and logistical support across various military branches. SAIC's history includes numerous awards for environmental remediation, compliance monitoring, and the development and delivery of specialized training programs. Their experience often involves supporting fleet readiness and ensuring adherence to environmental regulations, making them a well-established and experienced contractor for this type of requirement. Reviewing their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those with the U.S. Navy or other fleet commands, would provide further insight into their capabilities and reliability in executing this specific award.
How does the awarded amount of $21.6 million compare to historical spending on similar environmental training and support services for the U.S. Fleet Forces Command?
To accurately benchmark the $21.6 million award, historical spending data for similar environmental training and operational support services specifically for the U.S. Fleet Forces Command (FFC) would be necessary. Without direct historical figures for FFC's environmental training contracts, comparisons can be made to broader Navy or DoD environmental support contracts. Generally, multi-year contracts for specialized services supporting large operational commands can range from several million to tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on the scope. The $21.6 million over four years ($5.4 million per year on average) appears to be a moderate investment for a command like FFC, suggesting it covers essential training and support functions rather than extensive, large-scale environmental remediation projects. A detailed analysis would require access to historical contract databases and specific FFC budget allocations for these services.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are likely in place?
Primary risks for this contract include potential scope creep if training requirements evolve or are not clearly defined, contractor performance issues in delivering consistent and effective training, and the potential departure of key personnel with specialized knowledge. Given the firm-fixed-price nature, a significant risk is the contractor exceeding budget if unforeseen challenges arise, though this risk is primarily borne by SAIC. Mitigation strategies likely include robust government oversight, clearly defined performance work statements (PWS), regular progress reviews, and performance metrics tied to contract payments. The government may also require key personnel clauses and contingency planning from the contractor to address potential staffing disruptions. Ensuring clear communication channels and a collaborative relationship between the government and SAIC will be crucial for managing these risks effectively.
How effective is the firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type in ensuring value for money for this specific environmental training requirement?
The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money when the scope of work is well-defined and the risks are understood. For environmental training and operational support, where requirements can be standardized to a degree, FFP incentivizes the contractor to perform efficiently and control costs to maximize profit. This shifts the financial risk of cost overruns to the contractor, encouraging them to manage resources effectively. However, if the scope is highly variable or subject to significant change, FFP can sometimes lead to contractors building in higher contingency costs to protect themselves, potentially increasing the overall price. In this case, with a four-year duration and specific support functions, FFP likely promotes cost-consciousness and predictability for the government, contributing to good value, provided the performance standards are met.
What is the significance of this contract award within the broader context of environmental services procurement for the U.S. Navy?
This contract award signifies the U.S. Navy's continued commitment to maintaining high standards of environmental compliance and operational readiness across its fleet. Environmental training is crucial for ensuring that personnel are aware of and adhere to regulations, minimize environmental impact, and respond effectively to environmental incidents. Awards like this, especially when competed fully and awarded to experienced contractors like SAIC, demonstrate the Navy's strategy of leveraging specialized expertise to meet complex operational and regulatory demands. It reflects a significant investment in human capital development and operational efficiency, ensuring that the fleet can operate sustainably and responsibly. The scale of the award suggests it supports a substantial portion of the Fleet Forces Command's environmental training needs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: N0018922R3014
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 12010 SUNSET HILLS RD, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $30,302,512
Exercised Options: $21,729,517
Current Obligation: $21,584,717
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 6
Total Subaward Amount: $11,998,269
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017819D8470
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-09-29
Current End Date: 2026-09-28
Potential End Date: 2028-03-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-12
More Contracts from Science Applications International Corporation
- Task Order to Provide Project Management Support, Transition Support, Engineering and Design Support, Securing the Infrastructure Support and O&M Support for the Department's IT Consolidation Program — $2.1B (Department of State)
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Unified Nasa Information Technology Services (unites) — $1.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
- This Effort IS for a Follow on Procurement Requirement. the Name of This Procurement IS the Omnibus Multidiscipline Engineering Services (omes) II. the Principal Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide Multidiscipline Engineering Support Services and Related Work to EED, Istd, SED, MSD, Mesa, Jpss, Ssco, and Related Organizations, AS Required, for the Study, Design, Systems Engineering, Development, Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight, Airborne, and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. to This END, the Contractor Shall Provide On/Off-Site Multidiscipline Engineering Services, Pursuant to Task Orders Issued by the Contracting Officer. These Services Shall Include the Personnel, Facilities, and Materials (unless Otherwise Provided by the Government) to Accomplish the Tasks. Travel MAY BE Required by the Contractor to Support Certain Task Orders, These Travel Requirements Will BE Identified on a Task by Task Basis — $1.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all Science Applications International Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)