DoD's $279M Navy contract for fleet training range support awarded to Science Applications International Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,938,472 ($27.9M)

Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2017-08-31

End Date: 2022-09-28

Contract Duration: 1,854 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT FOR FLEET TRAINING RANGE COMPLEXES AND OPERATIONS WHILE MEETING OPTIMIZED FLEET RESPONSE PLAN (OFRP) REQUIREMENTS.

Place of Performance

Location: NORFOLK, NORFOLK CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23551

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $27.9 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT FOR FLEET TRAINING RANGE COMPLEXES AND OPERATIONS WHILE MEETING OPTIMIZED FLEET RESPONSE PLAN (OFRP) REQUIREMENTS. Key points: 1. Contract provides comprehensive operational and environmental support for fleet training range complexes. 2. Services are critical for meeting Optimized Fleet Response Plan (OFRP) requirements. 3. The contract duration of 1854 days indicates a long-term need for these specialized services. 4. Awarded under a full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 5. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 6. Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the sole awardee for this delivery order. 7. The contract value of approximately $279 million over its term represents significant investment in naval readiness.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $279.4 million over approximately five years for comprehensive operational and environmental support for fleet training range complexes appears reasonable given the scope. While specific cost breakdowns are not provided, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests an effort to manage costs. Benchmarking against similar large-scale support contracts for military training infrastructure would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment, but the duration and breadth of services indicate a substantial requirement.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data shows one award, which is typical for a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle. The level of competition for the initial award (not detailed here) would have influenced price discovery, but the fact that it was open to all suggests a robust process.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to more favorable pricing and innovative solutions, ensuring the government receives the best value.

Public Impact

Naval forces benefit from enhanced readiness and operational capabilities through well-maintained training ranges. Services ensure environmental compliance and operational efficiency at critical fleet training complexes. The contract supports the Department of the Navy's mission to maintain a global presence. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for engineers, environmental specialists, and support staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs, despite firm-fixed-price.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical operational support could pose a risk.
Environmental compliance challenges may arise in complex training range operations.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type helps control costs.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive award process.
Long contract duration indicates a stable, ongoing requirement and potential for contractor expertise development.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting defense infrastructure. The market for defense engineering and operational support services is substantial, driven by the continuous need for military readiness and modernization. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale contracts for base operations, training support, and environmental services within the Department of Defense and other federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside for this particular delivery order. Analysis of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would require further investigation into SAIC's subcontracting plan. Without this information, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear, though large prime contractors often utilize small businesses for specialized support.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program executive office within the Department of the Navy. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though detailed operational oversight specifics are not publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Naval Training Support Contracts
Fleet Readiness Programs
Environmental Compliance Services for DoD
Engineering Services for Military Infrastructure

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Sole Awardee for Delivery Order
Critical Infrastructure Support

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $27.9 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. IGF::OT::IGF COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT FOR FLEET TRAINING RANGE COMPLEXES AND OPERATIONS WHILE MEETING OPTIMIZED FLEET RESPONSE PLAN (OFRP) REQUIREMENTS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-08-31. End: 2022-09-28.

What is the historical spending pattern for fleet training range support by the Department of the Navy?

Historical spending on fleet training range support by the Department of the Navy has been substantial and consistent, reflecting the critical nature of these facilities for maintaining naval readiness. While specific figures for 'fleet training range support' as a distinct category can vary, overall spending on base operations, infrastructure maintenance, and specialized training services often runs into billions of dollars annually across the Navy. Contracts like the one awarded to SAIC are part of a broader strategy to ensure these ranges are operational, environmentally compliant, and capable of supporting evolving fleet requirements. Analyzing past contract awards, including their values, durations, and the contractors involved, reveals a trend of long-term commitments to maintaining and enhancing these vital assets. This consistent investment underscores the enduring importance of effective training environments for naval personnel and equipment.

How does the awarded value compare to similar contracts for operational and environmental support at military installations?

The awarded value of approximately $279.4 million over roughly five years for comprehensive operational and environmental support at fleet training range complexes is significant, aligning with the scale of major service contracts for military infrastructure. Similar contracts for base operations, facility management, and environmental services at large military installations often range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on the scope, duration, and specific services required. For instance, large-scale base operating support contracts can exceed $1 billion over several years. Given that this contract focuses on specialized 'training range complexes and operations,' which involve unique environmental and logistical challenges, the price point appears commensurate with the complexity and criticality of the services. A precise comparison would necessitate examining contracts with identical service scopes and geographic coverage, but the magnitude suggests it is within the expected range for such a vital defense function.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for a contract of this nature, providing operational and environmental support for fleet training range complexes, would likely focus on ensuring mission readiness and compliance. These could include metrics related to the availability and functionality of training range equipment and facilities, response times for operational issues, and the successful execution of training exercises without interruption due to support failures. Environmental KPIs would likely involve adherence to all environmental regulations, successful waste management, pollution prevention, and timely remediation of any environmental incidents. Furthermore, metrics related to safety performance, personnel qualifications, and adherence to schedules and budgets would also be critical. The contract's success hinges on SAIC's ability to maintain a high level of operational readiness for the ranges while ensuring all environmental obligations are met effectively and efficiently.

What is Science Applications International Corporation's (SAIC) track record with similar Department of Defense contracts?

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) has a substantial and extensive track record of performing complex services for the Department of Defense (DoD) and other federal agencies. They are a well-established prime contractor with significant experience in areas such as engineering, IT solutions, logistics, and mission support. SAIC has historically secured and successfully executed numerous large-scale contracts involving operational support, technical services, and environmental management for various military branches. Their portfolio often includes work on training ranges, simulation systems, and command and control infrastructure. While specific performance details for every contract are not always public, SAIC's continued success in winning and performing on high-value DoD contracts indicates a generally strong capability and a positive performance history in delivering complex technical and operational solutions to the military.

What are the potential risks associated with relying on a single contractor for critical fleet training range support?

Relying on a single contractor, such as SAIC in this instance, for critical fleet training range support presents several potential risks. Firstly, there's a risk of vendor lock-in, where the government may become overly dependent on the contractor's specific processes and technologies, making future transitions difficult or costly. Secondly, reduced competition could potentially lead to complacency or less aggressive pricing in future contract renewals or modifications, although the initial award was competitive. Thirdly, if the contractor experiences financial difficulties, labor disputes, or significant management issues, it could directly disrupt essential training operations, impacting fleet readiness. Finally, a single point of failure in oversight or performance management could have widespread consequences across multiple training ranges. Mitigating these risks often involves robust contract management, clear performance standards, and contingency planning.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0018917R3070

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12010 SUNSET HILLS RD, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $31,269,354

Exercised Options: $28,300,600

Current Obligation: $27,938,472

Actual Outlays: $1,180,135

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 23

Total Subaward Amount: $77,600,665

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4119

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline