DoD's $10.2M Patient Safety Services contract to Eagle Technologies, Inc. awarded in 2007, ending 2011

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,237,039 ($10.2M)

Contractor: Eagle Technologies, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-09-26

End Date: 2011-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,465 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: PATIENT SAFETY SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: BETHESDA, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20889

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.2 million to EAGLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: PATIENT SAFETY SERVICES Key points: 1. The contract's value of over $10 million for patient safety services represents a significant investment in healthcare support. 2. Awarded as a sole-source contract, it suggests limited market options or specific capabilities required from Eagle Technologies. 3. The duration of the contract (over 3 years) indicates a long-term need for these patient safety services. 4. Fixed pricing suggests cost certainty for the government, but may limit flexibility if requirements change. 5. The absence of a small business set-aside indicates the primary contractor is not a small business, and subcontracting opportunities are not explicitly mandated. 6. The contract falls under Facilities Support Services, highlighting the operational and logistical aspects of patient safety. 7. Performance occurred primarily in Maryland, indicating a localized impact for this specific contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without comparable patient safety service contracts from the same period. The total award amount of $10.2 million over approximately four years suggests an average annual spend of $2.55 million. This figure needs to be assessed against the scope and complexity of the patient safety services provided. Given the sole-source nature, it's difficult to ascertain if the pricing reflects competitive market rates or a premium for specialized services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This typically occurs when a specific contractor possesses unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or when there are urgent needs that preclude a full and open competition. The lack of competition limits the government's ability to leverage market forces to drive down prices and ensure the best possible value.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source award means taxpayers did not benefit from competitive bidding, potentially leading to a higher price than if multiple firms had vied for the contract. This also raises questions about the availability of alternative providers or the justification for not seeking competition.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are likely military personnel and their families receiving care within facilities managed by the Department of the Navy. The services delivered are crucial for maintaining a safe healthcare environment, potentially reducing medical errors and improving patient outcomes. The geographic impact is concentrated in Maryland, where the services were performed. Workforce implications include the direct employment of individuals by Eagle Technologies, Inc. to deliver these patient safety services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits price discovery and potentially increases costs for taxpayers.
Lack of explicit small business subcontracting requirements may limit opportunities for smaller firms in this sector.
Contract duration without clear performance metrics (if not detailed elsewhere) could pose a risk to sustained quality.

Positive Signals

Award to a single entity suggests specialized expertise in patient safety services.
Definitive contract structure provides a clear framework for service delivery.
Fixed-price contract offers cost predictability for the government.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader healthcare support services sector, specifically focusing on patient safety. The market for such services is driven by regulatory compliance, quality improvement initiatives, and the increasing complexity of healthcare delivery. While specific benchmarks for patient safety services are scarce, the overall facilities support services market is substantial. This contract represents a niche within that larger market, addressing critical aspects of healthcare operations.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of mandatory subcontracting requirements. This suggests that Eagle Technologies, Inc. is likely a larger entity capable of performing the services independently. The absence of a small business focus means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors, were likely limited.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is often limited for sole-source contracts, but contract award details are usually publicly available through federal procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Healthcare Contracts
Facilities Support Services
Patient Safety Initiatives
Navy Medical Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Sole-source award justification requires scrutiny.
Lack of performance metrics in summary data.
Potential for uncompetitive pricing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.2 million to EAGLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. PATIENT SAFETY SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EAGLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-09-26. End: 2011-09-30.

What specific patient safety services were provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'PATIENT SAFETY SERVICES' under NAICS code 561210 (Facilities Support Services). While the specific services are not detailed, they likely encompassed a range of activities aimed at enhancing patient safety within Department of the Navy facilities. This could include areas such as infection control support, patient identification systems, safety protocol development and implementation, incident reporting analysis, and potentially training for healthcare staff on safety best practices. The 'Facilities Support Services' classification suggests a focus on the operational and environmental aspects that contribute to patient safety, rather than direct clinical care.

How does the $10.2 million award compare to similar patient safety service contracts?

Direct comparison of this $10.2 million award for patient safety services is difficult without access to a comprehensive database of similar contracts from the same period (2007-2011) and with comparable scopes. However, considering it was a sole-source award over approximately four years, the annual average of roughly $2.55 million suggests a substantial commitment. The value needs to be contextualized by the size and type of facilities supported and the criticality of the safety functions performed. Without competitive data, it's hard to definitively state if this represents a high, low, or average value for the services rendered.

What are the risks associated with a sole-source award for patient safety services?

The primary risk of a sole-source award for patient safety services is the potential for inflated costs due to the lack of competitive pressure. Taxpayers may end up paying more than necessary if alternative providers could have offered similar services at a lower price. Another risk is a potential lack of innovation, as the incumbent contractor may have less incentive to improve services or adopt new technologies if they are not facing competition. Furthermore, it raises questions about the market's ability to support such critical services and whether the government adequately explored all options for competition before resorting to a sole-source justification.

What was Eagle Technologies, Inc.'s track record prior to this award?

Information regarding Eagle Technologies, Inc.'s specific track record prior to this 2007 award is not provided in the data. However, the fact that they were awarded a sole-source definitive contract by the Department of the Navy for patient safety services suggests they possessed specialized capabilities or had a prior relationship that justified this non-competitive award. Further investigation into their contract history, past performance reviews, and financial stability would be necessary to fully assess their track record.

How effective were the patient safety services provided under this contract?

The provided data does not include information on the effectiveness or performance outcomes of the patient safety services delivered by Eagle Technologies, Inc. under this contract. To assess effectiveness, one would need to examine performance metrics, quality assurance reports, patient safety incident rates within the supported facilities during the contract period, and any feedback from the Department of the Navy. Without such data, it is impossible to determine the contract's success in achieving its patient safety objectives.

What is the historical spending trend for patient safety services within the Department of the Navy?

The provided data only pertains to a single contract awarded in 2007. To understand historical spending trends for patient safety services within the Department of the Navy, a broader analysis of procurement data over multiple fiscal years would be required. This would involve identifying all contracts related to patient safety, facilities support, and healthcare services, aggregating their values, and analyzing trends in spending, contract types, and competition levels over time. This single data point does not provide sufficient information to establish any meaningful spending trends.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0018907RZ081

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 9301 ANNAPOLIS RD STE 200, LANHAM, MD, 20706

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,310,959

Exercised Options: $10,237,039

Current Obligation: $10,237,039

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline