DoD Awards $25.8M Maintenance Contract to DynCorp for Fleet & Industrial Supply Center
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $25,847,238 ($25.8M)
Contractor: Dyncorp Technical Services Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2000-05-12
End Date: 2005-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,967 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200009!1700!00J183!RA13A !FLEET & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENTER!N0014000CD500 !A!*!* !20000512!20010930!026424572!003242013!003242013!N!SF746!DYNCORP !6500 WEST FWY STE 600 !FORT WORTH !TX!76116!* !* !KU!* !* !KUWAIT !0001!+000011950762!Y!N!000000000000!J010!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/WEAPONS !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8711!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!003!B!* !Z!N!Z!* !* !N!M!*!*!*!A!A!A!A!* !*!N!A!B!N!*!*!*!*!*!
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $25.8 million to DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC for work described as: 200009!1700!00J183!RA13A !FLEET & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENTER!N0014000CD500 !A!*!* !20000512!20010930!026424572!003242013!003242013!N!SF746!DYNCORP !6500 WEST FWY STE 600 !FORT WORTH !TX!76116!* !* !KU!* !* … Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $25.8 million, was awarded to DynCorp Technical Services Inc. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract covers maintenance and repair of equipment and weapons systems. 4. The sector is primarily defense services, with potential implications for military readiness.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $25.8 million appears reasonable for a multi-year maintenance and repair services contract for military equipment. Benchmarking against similar large-scale defense service contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing as multiple vendors have the opportunity to bid.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is likely to result in cost savings for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operational readiness of military equipment and weapons systems. Supports the Department of the Navy's logistical and maintenance capabilities. DynCorp's role in maintaining critical defense assets highlights the importance of private sector support in military operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in cost-plus contracts if not closely monitored.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical maintenance services.
- Scope creep could increase the final cost beyond the initial award amount.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, promoting cost-effectiveness.
- Contract duration of nearly 2 years ensures continuity of essential services.
- Supports military readiness and operational capabilities.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically focusing on maintenance and repair of equipment and weapons. Spending in this area is critical for maintaining military readiness and operational effectiveness, with benchmarks often tied to the complexity and type of equipment being serviced.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that the prime contractor is DynCorp Technical Services Inc., and there is no explicit mention of small business participation or subcontracting in the provided details. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Navy, is responsible for overseeing this contract. Standard procurement regulations and oversight mechanisms are expected to be in place to ensure performance and financial accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract type (CPFF) can lead to cost uncertainty.
- Lack of explicit small business participation details.
- Potential for scope creep in maintenance contracts.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical services.
Tags
department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $25.8 million to DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC. 200009!1700!00J183!RA13A !FLEET & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENTER!N0014000CD500 !A!*!* !20000512!20010930!026424572!003242013!003242013!N!SF746!DYNCORP !6500 WEST FWY STE 600 !FORT WORTH !TX!76116!* !* !KU!* !* !KUWAIT !0001!+000011950762!Y!N!000000000000!J010!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/WEAPONS !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8711!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $25.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2000-05-12. End: 2005-09-30.
What specific types of equipment and weapons systems are covered under this maintenance contract, and how does their complexity influence the cost?
The contract specifies 'MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/WEAPONS'. The complexity of these systems, ranging from standard vehicles to advanced weaponry, directly impacts the labor, specialized tools, and expertise required. Highly complex or sensitive equipment necessitates more skilled technicians and rigorous quality control, driving up costs. Without a detailed breakdown of the equipment, a precise cost analysis is challenging.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and performance standards established for DynCorp to ensure effective maintenance and repair services?
Effective oversight would involve clearly defined KPIs such as response times for repair requests, equipment uptime percentages, quality of repair work (e.g., defect rates post-repair), and adherence to safety protocols. The Department of the Navy would likely track these metrics through regular performance reviews and potentially site inspections to ensure DynCorp meets contractual obligations and maintains the readiness of the assets.
How does the 'COST PLUS FIXED FEE' (CPFF) contract type potentially impact the final cost and the government's ability to control expenditures?
A CPFF contract means the government reimburses the contractor for all allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. While it incentivizes the contractor to control costs to maximize their fee, it can lead to higher final costs if initial cost estimates are inaccurate or if unforeseen issues arise. The government's ability to control expenditures relies heavily on robust cost accounting standards and diligent oversight to ensure only reasonable and allocable costs are reimbursed.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Contractor Details
Address: 6500 WEST FWY STE 600, FORT WORTH, TX, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2000-05-12
Current End Date: 2005-09-30
Potential End Date: 2005-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-08-23
More Contracts from Dyncorp Technical Services Inc
- Federal Contract — $233.4M (Department of Defense)
- Labor Svcs to Perform AIR Test and Evaluation AOA Indirect/Direct Maintenance Requirements — $174.7M (Department of Defense)
- Maintenance and Modification of Nasa JSC Assigned Aircraft — $113.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200411!000709!5700!GD15 !oc-Alc/Lidac !F3460197D0422 !A!N! !N!0138 ! !20040823!20050823!608461898!003242013!009581091!n!dyncorp International LLC !6500 West Freeway, Suite 6!fort Worth !tx!76116!26736!027!48!fort Hood !bell !texas !+000036119625!n!n!000000000000!j016!maint & Repair of Eq/Aircraft Comps & Accys !a1c!other Aircraft Equipment !000 !* !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!y!2!004!b! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y!2100! !0001! ! — $74.2M (Department of Defense)
- 200607!000750!5700!fa8108!oc-Alc/Lad CFT !F3460197D0422 !A!N! !N!0177 ! !20060206!20070205!608461898!003242013!009581091!n!dyncorp International LLC !13500 Heritage Parkway !fort Worth !tx!76177!26736!027!48!fort Hood !bell !texas !+000000300000!n!n!000000000000!j015!maint & Repair of Eq/Aircraft Structural Comps !a1c!other Aircraft Equipment !000 !NOT Discernable !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!y!2!004!b! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y!2100! !0001! ! — $70.7M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)