NASA's $12.4M RLV Propulsion Risk Reduction contract with Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc. for space research
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,400,783 ($12.4M)
Contractor: Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2001-05-21
End Date: 2009-09-26
Contract Duration: 3,050 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 51
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: TECHONOLOGY AREA 8 (TAB) PROPULSION RISK REDUCTION SECOND GENERATION REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE (RLV)
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35812
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $12.4 million to AEROJET ROCKETDYNE INC for work described as: TECHONOLOGY AREA 8 (TAB) PROPULSION RISK REDUCTION SECOND GENERATION REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE (RLV) Key points: 1. Contract focused on reducing risks for reusable launch vehicle propulsion systems. 2. Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc. was the sole awardee under full and open competition. 3. The contract spanned over 8 years, indicating a long-term research and development effort. 4. Cost-plus incentive fee structure suggests performance-based incentives for the contractor. 5. The contract was awarded by NASA's Space Launch System program office. 6. This initiative aligns with NASA's broader goals for advanced space exploration and technology.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this specific contract is challenging due to its specialized nature in RLV propulsion risk reduction and its historical context (2001-2009). The cost-plus incentive fee (CPIF) structure aims to balance cost control with performance, but actual value depends heavily on the achieved risk reduction milestones. Without detailed performance data and comparable contracts for similar R&D efforts, a definitive value assessment is difficult. The duration of the contract suggests a significant investment in technology development.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited. However, the fact that only one award was made suggests that Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc. was the most qualified or competitive bidder for this specific, highly specialized RLV propulsion risk reduction effort. The level of competition for such niche R&D can be limited by the availability of specialized expertise.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to bid, potentially driving down costs and ensuring the best value is obtained. However, for highly specialized R&D, the number of capable bidders may be inherently limited.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA's Space Launch System program by advancing critical propulsion technologies. Enhances the safety and reliability of future reusable launch vehicles. Contributes to the development of advanced aerospace engineering capabilities within the US. Supports the growth of specialized aerospace manufacturing and research sectors. Potential long-term impact on reducing the cost of space access through reusable technology.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (8 years) could lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- CPIF contracts can sometimes incentivize contractors to incur higher costs if incentives are not perfectly aligned with overall program goals.
- Specialized nature of the technology may limit the pool of potential competitors for future related contracts.
Positive Signals
- Focus on risk reduction directly addresses critical aspects of launch vehicle development.
- Full and open competition, even with a single award, suggests an attempt to find the best solution.
- The contract's completion within the specified timeframe (though long) indicates progress in a complex field.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Aerospace and Defense sector, specifically focusing on space launch vehicle technology. The market for RLV propulsion is highly specialized, dominated by a few key players with extensive R&D capabilities. NASA's spending in this area is crucial for maintaining technological leadership and enabling future space missions. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish due to the unique nature of risk reduction efforts, but investments in propulsion systems are typically substantial.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. Given the highly specialized nature of reusable launch vehicle propulsion risk reduction, it is unlikely that small businesses would be the primary contractors for such a complex R&D effort. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist in specific component manufacturing or support services, but the prime contract is with a large aerospace firm.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would have been managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers. As a cost-plus incentive fee contract, performance metrics and milestones would be closely monitored to ensure the achievement of risk reduction goals and control costs. Transparency would be facilitated through regular reporting requirements from the contractor. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Space Launch System (SLS)
- Advanced Propulsion Systems Research
- Reusable Launch Vehicle Development Programs
- NASA Research and Development Contracts
Risk Flags
- Long-term R&D contract duration
- Specialized technology area
- Sole awardee under full and open competition
Tags
nasa, aerojet-rocketdyne-inc, space-research-and-technology, definitive-contract, cost-plus-incentive-fee, full-and-open-competition, reusable-launch-vehicle, propulsion-systems, risk-reduction, alabama, 2001-2009
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $12.4 million to AEROJET ROCKETDYNE INC. TECHONOLOGY AREA 8 (TAB) PROPULSION RISK REDUCTION SECOND GENERATION REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE (RLV)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AEROJET ROCKETDYNE INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2001-05-21. End: 2009-09-26.
What specific propulsion technologies were targeted for risk reduction under this contract?
The contract, 'TECHNOLOGY AREA 8 (TAB) PROPULSION RISK REDUCTION SECOND GENERATION REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE (RLV)', focused on mitigating risks associated with advanced propulsion systems for future reusable launch vehicles. While the provided data does not detail the specific technologies, such efforts typically involve areas like engine reliability, thermal management, fuel efficiency, materials science for high-stress environments, and advanced manufacturing techniques for complex engine components. The goal was to mature these technologies to a point where their integration into operational RLVs would be less risky and more predictable, thereby reducing the likelihood of mission failure or significant cost overruns during later development phases.
How did the cost-plus incentive fee (CPIF) structure influence Aerojet Rocketdyne's performance?
The Cost-Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure is designed to incentivize the contractor to perform efficiently by sharing in cost savings or cost overruns. In this contract, Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc. would have had a target cost, a target profit, and a fee-sharing formula. If the final cost was below the target, both NASA and Aerojet would share in the savings, with Aerojet receiving a higher profit. Conversely, if costs exceeded the target, Aerojet's profit would be reduced, and potentially they could incur a loss if costs went significantly over. This structure encourages the contractor to manage costs effectively while meeting performance objectives related to risk reduction, aiming to achieve a balance between cost control and technological advancement.
What was the significance of the contract's duration (2001-2009) for RLV development?
The contract's extensive duration of approximately 8 years (from May 2001 to September 2009) highlights the complex and long-term nature of developing advanced propulsion systems for reusable launch vehicles (RLVs). Such R&D efforts require significant time for research, design, prototyping, testing, and iterative refinement. A multi-year timeline allows for thorough investigation of technical challenges, exploration of innovative solutions, and rigorous validation of performance and reliability. This extended period suggests that the contract was focused on fundamental technology maturation rather than the assembly of a near-ready system, aiming to lay a robust foundation for subsequent RLV programs.
Were there any performance issues or cost overruns reported during the contract's lifecycle?
The provided data does not contain specific details regarding performance issues or cost overruns for this particular contract. However, the nature of Cost-Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contracts means that cost performance is inherently monitored and shared. Without access to NASA's internal contract performance reports, audit findings, or program reviews from that era, it is impossible to definitively state whether the contract experienced significant deviations from its planned costs or performance targets. The long duration and R&D focus suggest that some level of adjustment and re-evaluation of targets may have occurred.
How does this contract compare to other NASA investments in propulsion technology?
This contract represents a specific investment in risk reduction for second-generation RLV propulsion, distinct from broader engine development or procurement contracts. NASA invests heavily in propulsion across various programs, including the Space Launch System (SLS), Commercial Crew/Cargo, and advanced concepts. This $12.4 million contract, while significant for its focused R&D scope, is likely a component within a larger portfolio of propulsion-related spending. Its value lies in its targeted approach to mitigating risks for future reusable systems, potentially enabling more cost-effective and reliable space access in the long run, compared to contracts focused solely on building or testing existing engine designs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Public Administration › Space Research and Technology › Space Research and Technology
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Space R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: BASIC RESEARCH
Offers Received: 51
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 001316330)
Address: HWY 50 & AEROJET ROAD, RANCHO CORDOVA, CA, 95742
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $12,421,850
Exercised Options: $12,421,850
Current Obligation: $12,400,783
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Timeline
Start Date: 2001-05-21
Current End Date: 2009-09-26
Potential End Date: 2009-09-26 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-03-02
More Contracts from Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc
- Exploration Upper Stage Engines Msfc Will Procure TEN (10) RL10 Flight Engines From Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. to Support the Space Launch System (SLS) Exploration Missions 2 and 3 (EM-2 and EM-3). Each Flight Will Require a Four (4) Engine Cluster. Additionally, TWO (2) Spare Engines Will BE Procured. Corresponding to These Specific RL10 Engines, Nasa Msfc Will Procure Vehicle and Program Integration Support, Flight Support, and Human Rating Compliance Review Support — $285.1M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Nasa, Through the Space Technology Mission Directorate (stmd,) Seeks to Demonstrate an Advanced Solar Electric Propulsion (EP) System That Will Enable Future Deep Space Human and Robotic Exploration Applicable to the United States Private and Public Sector Space Needs. the Purpose of the Advanced Electric Propulsion (EP) System (aeps) Contract IS the Development and Delivery of EP String Sets to Support an Advanced SEP Demonstration Mission. During the Contract Base Period of Performance, the Contractor Will Develop, Test, and Deliver Engineering Development END Items That Will Reduce the Risk of Developing the Flight END Items. During the Option Period of Performance, IF Exercised, the Contractor Will Develop, Verify, and Deliver the Flight END Items — $230.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Technical Effort - Analysis and Design Engine Assembly (adea) - Hydrocarbon Boost to Provide High Operability and Flight Reliability AS Related to Reusable Liquid Rocket Engine (LRE) — $175.9M (Department of Defense)
- Stinger Flight Motors Increase — $53.6M (Department of Defense)
- Research and Development (R&D) - Stage 2 Large Class Tech Demo — $51.4M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →