NASA awards $27.7M contract for OSB Building II construction to Clancy & Theys Construction Co
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,729,586 ($27.7M)
Contractor: Clancy & Theys Construction CO
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2003-01-15
End Date: 2010-08-31
Contract Duration: 2,785 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: CONSTRUCTION OF OSB BUILDING II
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, BREVARD County, FLORIDA, 32899
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $27.7 million to CLANCY & THEYS CONSTRUCTION CO for work described as: CONSTRUCTION OF OSB BUILDING II Key points: 1. The contract value is $27.7 million, awarded by NASA. 2. Clancy & Theys Construction Co. secured the contract. 3. The project falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. 4. The award date was January 15, 2003, with an end date of August 31, 2010. 5. The contract was awarded under full and open competition.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $27.7 million for a large construction project appears within a reasonable range for similar institutional building projects. However, without specific details on the building's size, complexity, and location, a precise benchmark is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to competitive pricing as multiple qualified bidders submit proposals.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally ensures taxpayer funds are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces.
Public Impact
Construction of a significant facility for NASA's operations. Potential for job creation in the Florida region during the construction period. Impact on the local economy through material procurement and labor.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (2785 days) could indicate potential for cost overruns or scope creep.
- Lack of specific details on the building's purpose and size makes it hard to assess value comprehensively.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically institutional building construction. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on project scale, location, and economic conditions. NASA's infrastructure projects are typically large-scale and critical to its operations.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by NASA, a federal agency with established oversight mechanisms. The duration and fixed-price nature suggest a degree of accountability for project completion within budget.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration.
- Potential for scope creep over an extended project timeline.
- Limited information on specific building requirements and final cost performance.
- Lack of data on small business participation.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, fl, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $27.7 million to CLANCY & THEYS CONSTRUCTION CO. CONSTRUCTION OF OSB BUILDING II
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CLANCY & THEYS CONSTRUCTION CO.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-01-15. End: 2010-08-31.
What was the final cost compared to the initial bid or estimated cost?
The provided data does not include information on the initial bid or estimated cost, nor the final expenditure relative to the awarded amount. To assess value, a comparison of the awarded contract value ($27.7M) against the initial estimates and any change orders would be necessary.
Were there any significant delays or cost overruns during the contract period?
The contract duration was 2785 days (approximately 7.6 years), which is substantial for a construction project. While the data doesn't explicitly state delays or overruns, such a long period increases the inherent risk of scope changes, unforeseen site conditions, or market fluctuations impacting the final cost.
How does the cost per square foot compare to similar institutional buildings in Florida?
Without the building's square footage or detailed specifications, a cost-per-square-foot benchmark cannot be calculated. To assess this, one would need the total square footage of the OSB Building II and comparable data for similar NASA or government institutional buildings in the Florida region.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: HSD
Contractor Details
Address: 516 W CABARRUS ST, RALEIGH, NC, 02
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,729,586
Exercised Options: $27,729,586
Current Obligation: $27,729,586
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-01-15
Current End Date: 2010-08-31
Potential End Date: 2010-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-05-06
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →