Department of the Interior awarded $13.1M to BearingPoint for computer systems design services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,110,575 ($13.1M)

Contractor: Deloitte Consulting LLP

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2004-09-20

End Date: 2005-12-31

Contract Duration: 467 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.1K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: BEARINGPOINT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20240

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $13.1 million to DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP for work described as: BEARINGPOINT Key points: 1. The contract value of $13.1M for computer systems design services appears reasonable given the duration and scope. 2. Competition dynamics for this delivery order were not fully detailed, but the presence of multiple bidders suggests a degree of market engagement. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with a firm-fixed-price contract type generally mitigating cost overrun risks. 4. Performance context is limited to the service category, with no specific performance metrics provided. 5. This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically computer systems design. 6. The award was a delivery order under a larger contract, indicating a phased approach to service acquisition.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.1 million for computer systems design services over approximately 1.5 years appears to be within a reasonable range for similar government IT projects. Benchmarking against other contracts for similar services and durations would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the scope and cost, which is a positive indicator for cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this specific task order. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government receives services at a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely resulted in a more favorable price compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Department of the Interior, which receives essential computer systems design services. The services delivered are focused on enhancing or developing the department's IT infrastructure and capabilities. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia, where the Department of the Interior is headquartered. Workforce implications include the employment of IT professionals by BearingPoint to fulfill the contract requirements.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the quality and effectiveness of the services provided.
The specific nature of the computer systems design work is not elaborated, leaving room for potential scope creep if not managed tightly.
Reliance on a single delivery order for a significant IT project could indicate a fragmented approach to IT modernization.

Positive Signals

The contract was awarded competitively, suggesting a fair market price was likely achieved.
The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The award to a known entity like BearingPoint suggests a degree of confidence in their capabilities.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically in the area of computer systems design services. This is a critical area for government operations, as modern IT infrastructure underpins most federal agency functions. The market for IT services is highly competitive, with numerous large and small businesses offering specialized expertise. The value of this contract, $13.1 million, is moderate within the broader context of federal IT spending, which can range into billions annually for complex system designs and implementations.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses, nor is there information about subcontracting plans. Given the nature of computer systems design services and the prime contractor, it is possible that larger firms are involved, but the extent of small business participation is not detailed in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of the Interior. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed budget. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available.

Related Government Programs

IT Services
Computer Systems Design
Department of the Interior IT Modernization
Federal IT Procurement

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics
Limited scope definition in provided data

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $13.1 million to DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP. BEARINGPOINT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Departmental Offices).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-09-20. End: 2005-12-31.

What was the specific nature of the computer systems design services provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Computer Systems Design Services' (NAICS code 541512) awarded to BearingPoint by the Department of the Interior. However, the specific nature of these services is not detailed. This could encompass a wide range of activities, such as designing new software systems, integrating existing systems, developing network architectures, or planning IT infrastructure upgrades. Without further documentation or a detailed statement of work, it is impossible to ascertain the precise technical tasks performed. Understanding the specific services is crucial for evaluating the contract's effectiveness and relevance to the Department's mission.

How does the $13.1 million contract value compare to similar IT services contracts awarded by the Department of the Interior or other federal agencies?

Benchmarking the $13.1 million contract value requires comparing it to similar 'Computer Systems Design Services' contracts (NAICS 541512) awarded by the Department of the Interior and other agencies over comparable timeframes (approximately 1.5 years). Federal IT spending varies significantly based on complexity, duration, and specific requirements. While $13.1 million is a substantial sum, it may be considered moderate for a comprehensive systems design project. For instance, larger agencies like the Department of Defense or HHS often award multi-year, multi-million dollar contracts for enterprise-wide IT solutions. A detailed analysis would involve querying contract databases for comparable awards to assess if this contract represents good value for money or if it appears to be priced above or below market rates for similar services.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract, and how was performance measured?

The provided data does not include information on Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or specific deliverables for this contract. For a 'Computer Systems Design Services' contract, typical KPIs might include adherence to project timelines, successful completion of design milestones, quality of technical documentation, and user acceptance testing results. Performance measurement would usually involve regular progress reports, technical reviews, and final acceptance of the designed systems or components. The absence of this information makes it challenging to assess the contractor's performance and the overall success of the project from a quality and efficiency standpoint. Effective contract management relies on clearly defined and measurable performance standards.

What is BearingPoint's track record with federal IT contracts, particularly in computer systems design?

BearingPoint, as a consulting firm, has a history of working with federal agencies on various IT and management consulting projects. While the provided data shows this specific $13.1 million award, a comprehensive assessment of their track record would involve reviewing their past performance on similar contracts, including client feedback, any past performance issues or disputes, and their success in delivering complex IT solutions. Their experience in computer systems design would be a key factor. Examining contract databases for other awards to BearingPoint, their performance ratings (if available), and the types of IT services they have provided to the government would offer a clearer picture of their capabilities and reliability in this domain.

Were there any significant risks identified or mitigation strategies employed for this contract?

The provided data does not explicitly detail any specific risks identified or mitigation strategies employed for this contract. However, general risks associated with IT system design contracts can include technical challenges, scope creep, integration issues with existing systems, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and schedule delays. The firm-fixed-price contract type helps mitigate financial risks for the government by establishing a ceiling on costs. Other potential mitigation strategies could involve robust project management, clear communication protocols, phased delivery, and thorough testing. The competitive award process itself can also be seen as a risk mitigation factor, as it tends to select contractors with a proven ability to deliver.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Deloitte LLP (UEI: 014127109)

Address: 4301 N FAIRFAX DR STE 210, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,110,575

Exercised Options: $13,110,575

Current Obligation: $13,110,575

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F4338D

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline