DoD's $11.2M Remote Minehunting System Support Contract Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,232,975 ($11.2M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-04-26

End Date: 2012-10-04

Contract Duration: 1,988 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: REMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM TDA AND ISEA SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: LINTHICUM HEIGHTS, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 21090, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.2 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC for work described as: REMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM TDA AND ISEA SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton for $11.2M for TDA and ISEA support. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration was 1988 days, indicating a long-term engagement. 4. The primary sector is Defense, with a focus on Engineering Services. 5. No small business participation was noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF), which can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar CPAF contracts for engineering services is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing. However, the CPAF structure means the final price is influenced by performance incentives.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is positive for taxpayer value. The CPAF structure requires careful oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable and performance is achieved.

Public Impact

Supports critical minehunting capabilities for the Department of Defense. Ensures technological readiness and operational effectiveness of naval assets. Potential for technological advancements in remote sensing and autonomous systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract type can incentivize cost overruns.
  • Lack of small business participation limits opportunities for smaller innovative firms.
  • Long contract duration may not adapt well to rapidly evolving technology.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition, promoting market efficiency.
  • Supports a critical national security function (minehunting).
  • Experienced contractor (Booz Allen Hamilton) likely brings significant expertise.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically engineering services supporting advanced military technology. Spending benchmarks for similar complex system support contracts can vary widely based on scope and duration.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded to small businesses, as indicated by 'sb': false. This suggests that large businesses dominated the bidding process for this particular requirement.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract utilized a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure, which necessitates robust oversight from the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) to ensure cost control and performance targets are met.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF structure.
  • Lack of small business involvement.
  • Long contract duration may lead to technology obsolescence.
  • Dependence on a single large contractor for critical support.

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, md, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.2 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC. REMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM TDA AND ISEA SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-04-26. End: 2012-10-04.

What specific technical capabilities does the Remote Minehunting System TDA and ISEA support entail, and how do these align with current defense needs?

The TDA (Technical Data Package) and ISEA (In-Service Engineering Activity) support likely encompasses the maintenance, upgrade, and sustainment of the Remote Minehunting System's hardware and software. This includes ensuring the system's operational readiness, providing technical documentation, and addressing engineering challenges. The alignment with current defense needs is crucial for maintaining maritime security and neutralizing underwater threats effectively.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure competitive pricing for this Cost Plus Award Fee contract?

While full and open competition is designed to foster competitive pricing, the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure introduces variables. The base cost is negotiated, but the final award fee is tied to performance metrics. Effective competition would have driven down the initial base cost, while strong performance management by the agency is critical to prevent excessive fee payouts, ensuring overall value despite the CPAF mechanism.

What is the long-term strategic value of investing in remote minehunting systems and their associated engineering support, considering evolving threats?

Investing in remote minehunting systems offers significant strategic value by reducing risk to personnel and platforms in hazardous environments. Continuous engineering support ensures these systems remain effective against evolving threats, such as advanced naval mines and countermeasures. This sustained investment is vital for maintaining freedom of navigation, protecting naval forces, and projecting power in maritime domains.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0002407R3157

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 2551 RIVA ROAD, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 21401

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $197,916,800

Exercised Options: $86,384,500

Current Obligation: $11,232,975

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4016

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-04-26

Current End Date: 2012-10-04

Potential End Date: 2012-10-04 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-10-05

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending