DoD's $11.65M GAPS Program Aims to Isolate High-Risk Transactions with Provable Security Architectures
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,650,707 ($11.7M)
Contractor: General Electric Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2019-08-28
End Date: 2026-04-30
Contract Duration: 2,437 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: THE GOAL OF THE GUARANTEED ARCHITECTURE FOR PHYSICAL SECURITY (GAPS) PROGRAM IS TO DEVELOP HARDWARE SECURITY AND SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES WITH PROVABLE SECURITY INTERFACES TO PHYSICALLY ISOLATE HIGH RISK TRANSACTIONS.
Place of Performance
Location: SCHENECTADY, SCHENECTADY County, NEW YORK, 12309
State: New York Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.7 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: THE GOAL OF THE GUARANTEED ARCHITECTURE FOR PHYSICAL SECURITY (GAPS) PROGRAM IS TO DEVELOP HARDWARE SECURITY AND SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES WITH PROVABLE SECURITY INTERFACES TO PHYSICALLY ISOLATE HIGH RISK TRANSACTIONS. Key points: 1. Focuses on developing advanced hardware and software security architectures for high-risk transactions. 2. Contract awarded to General Electric Company, a major player in defense and technology. 3. Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (NAICS 541715) category. 4. Long-duration contract (2019-2026) suggests a complex, multi-phase development effort. 5. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a broad search for qualified contractors. 6. Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type implies potential for cost overruns but incentivizes contractor efficiency.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $11.65 million for a multi-year R&D effort in advanced security architectures appears reasonable given the complexity and specialized nature of the work. Benchmarking against similar DARPA programs would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type, while common for R&D, carries inherent risks of cost escalation if not closely managed. Without specific performance metrics or deliverables tied to the funding, a definitive value assessment is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors were likely solicited and evaluated. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, driving innovation and potentially leading to more favorable pricing. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery and ensuring the government receives the best available solution.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by promoting a wider range of solutions and encouraging competitive pricing, which can lead to more efficient use of public funds.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense (DoD) is the primary beneficiary, aiming to enhance the security of high-risk transactions. The program will deliver novel hardware and software security architectures with provable security interfaces. Geographic impact is primarily within the United States, with potential for broader application in secure transaction systems. Workforce implications include specialized roles in cybersecurity, hardware engineering, and software development.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost overruns are a potential risk with Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts if not rigorously monitored.
- The long duration of the contract could lead to scope creep or evolving technological requirements.
- Measuring the 'provable security' of developed architectures may present significant validation challenges.
Positive Signals
- Focus on developing 'provable security' indicates a commitment to rigorous and verifiable solutions.
- Awarding to a major defense contractor like General Electric suggests access to significant technical expertise and resources.
- Full and open competition increases the likelihood of selecting the most innovative and cost-effective approach.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical and engineering sciences. The market for advanced cybersecurity and transaction security solutions is highly competitive and rapidly evolving. DARPA's GAPS program aims to push the boundaries of current capabilities, potentially creating new market standards for secure transaction architectures. Comparable spending in this niche R&D area is difficult to pinpoint without more specific technical details, but DARPA's overall R&D budget provides context for the scale of such exploratory projects.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-asides. General Electric Company is a large business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific contract appears limited, though large prime contractors often engage small businesses for specialized support.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) program managers, who are responsible for monitoring technical progress, adherence to schedule, and financial expenditures. As a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract, financial oversight is crucial to manage costs effectively. Transparency is generally maintained through program reviews and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- DARPA Research Programs
- DoD Cybersecurity Initiatives
- Advanced Transaction Security Systems
- Hardware Security Research
- Software Architecture Development
Risk Flags
- Cost Overrun Potential (CPFF Contract)
- Long-Term Project Scope Management
- Validation of 'Provable Security'
Tags
research-and-development, department-of-defense, darpa, cybersecurity, transaction-security, hardware-security, software-architecture, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, new-york, large-business
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.7 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. THE GOAL OF THE GUARANTEED ARCHITECTURE FOR PHYSICAL SECURITY (GAPS) PROGRAM IS TO DEVELOP HARDWARE SECURITY AND SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES WITH PROVABLE SECURITY INTERFACES TO PHYSICALLY ISOLATE HIGH RISK TRANSACTIONS.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-08-28. End: 2026-04-30.
What is the specific definition of 'provable security interfaces' within the context of the GAPS program, and how will it be validated?
The GAPS program aims to develop hardware and software architectures with 'provable security interfaces' to physically isolate high-risk transactions. Within this context, 'provable security' likely refers to formal methods and rigorous mathematical proofs demonstrating that the system meets specific security properties, such as confidentiality, integrity, and resistance to certain types of attacks. Validation would involve a combination of formal verification techniques, extensive testing under adversarial conditions, and potentially third-party audits. The specific metrics and methodologies for validation are critical components that DARPA would define and oversee throughout the contract's lifecycle. The success of the program hinges on the ability to move beyond traditional testing and achieve a higher degree of assurance in the security guarantees provided by the developed architectures.
How does the $11.65 million funding compare to other DARPA R&D contracts in similar technology areas?
The $11.65 million funding for the GAPS program appears to be within the typical range for DARPA research contracts, especially those involving complex hardware and software development over several years. DARPA projects often range from a few million to tens of millions of dollars, depending on the scope, duration, and technological ambition. For instance, other DARPA programs focused on advanced computing, artificial intelligence, or materials science have seen funding levels in a similar bracket. The specific nature of developing 'provable security architectures' for transaction isolation suggests a high degree of technical challenge and specialized expertise, justifying this level of investment. A direct comparison would require identifying contracts with identical technical objectives and timelines, which are often classified or not publicly detailed.
What are the potential risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for a long-term R&D project like GAPS?
The primary risk with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract, like the one awarded for the GAPS program, is the potential for cost overruns. While the 'fixed fee' provides the contractor with a defined profit margin, the 'cost plus' element means the government reimburses the contractor for all allowable costs incurred. If the project encounters unforeseen technical challenges, requires more resources than initially estimated, or if cost tracking is not rigorous, the total cost to the government can exceed initial projections. For a long-term R&D project, the evolving nature of technology and research can lead to scope adjustments or the need for additional resources, increasing this risk. Effective oversight, detailed cost reporting, and strong program management are essential to mitigate these risks and ensure the project stays within budget.
What is General Electric Company's track record in delivering complex R&D projects for the Department of Defense?
General Electric (GE), through its various divisions including GE Aviation and GE Research, has a long and extensive track record of delivering complex R&D projects and advanced technologies for the Department of Defense and other government agencies. They have been involved in numerous high-technology initiatives, including aerospace, advanced materials, power systems, and increasingly, digital and cybersecurity solutions. GE's experience spans fundamental research to system integration and production. Their involvement in projects requiring sophisticated engineering and adherence to stringent security requirements is well-established. While specific details of past DARPA contracts may vary, GE's overall capacity and history suggest they possess the technical expertise and project management capabilities necessary to undertake a program like GAPS.
How might the success of the GAPS program impact future DoD transaction security protocols?
The success of the GAPS program could significantly influence future DoD transaction security protocols by introducing a new paradigm based on 'provable security.' If the developed architectures can demonstrably and reliably isolate high-risk transactions, it could lead to a shift away from traditional, often vulnerability-prone, security measures. This could result in more robust defenses against sophisticated cyber threats, ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of sensitive data during critical operations. Furthermore, the methodologies and standards developed for 'provable security' might become benchmarks for future DoD acquisitions and system designs, fostering a culture of higher assurance security across various platforms and applications. This could ultimately enhance the overall cybersecurity posture of the DoD.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › DEFENSE (OTHER) R&D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: BASIC RESEARCH
Solicitation ID: HR001119S0017
Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 RESEARCH CIR, NISKAYUNA, NY, 12309
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,698,463
Exercised Options: $11,698,463
Current Obligation: $11,650,707
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-08-28
Current End Date: 2026-04-30
Potential End Date: 2026-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-22
More Contracts from General Electric Company
- 200607!387702!1700!n00019!naval AIR Systems Command !N0001906C0088 !A!N! !N! ! !20060424!20090131!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01905!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000018238000!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !336412!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!u!j!1!001!n!1a!z!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! ! — $2.4B (Department of Defense)
- Adaptive Engine Transition Program (aetp) — $2.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200608!001069!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz06c0038 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051215!20101231!137488664!137488664!001367960!n!general Electric Company !1 Neumann WAY !cincinnati !oh!45215!15000!061!39!cincinnati !hamilton !ohio !+000177879422!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- 200210!004379!1700!AA427 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001901C0147 !A!N! !N!P00001 !20020508!20031130!001408509!001408509!001367960!n!general Electric Company Inc !1000 Western AVE !lynn !ma!01910!37490!009!25!lynn !essex !mass !+000060619860!n!n!000000000000!2840!gas Turbines and JET Engines, Acft & Comps !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !2bjn!f414-Ge-400 !336412!E! !1! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!j!1!001!n!1a!a!w!f! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.5B (Department of Defense)
- F414-GE-400 Engines — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)