NASA's $9.9M training logistics contract to RGI, Inc. awarded under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $9,930,589 ($9.9M)
Contractor: RGI, Incorporated
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2003-09-15
End Date: 2009-03-31
Contract Duration: 2,024 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 51
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TRAINING LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: FALLS CHURCH, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22041
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $9.9 million to RGI, INCORPORATED for work described as: TRAINING LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value represents a modest portion of NASA's overall administrative services spending. 2. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract (over 5 years) indicates a need for sustained support. 4. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 5. The contractor, RGI, Inc., has a track record with this specific service for NASA. 6. The contract's value is relatively small compared to major NASA procurements.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $9.9 million over its lifespan appears reasonable for specialized training logistics support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for administrative and training services within government agencies suggests this pricing is within expected ranges. The firm-fixed-price structure incentivizes contractor efficiency, potentially leading to better value for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data indicates 51 offers were received, demonstrating a robust level of interest and competition for this requirement. A high number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors.
Taxpayer Impact: The strong competition for this contract likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition award. It ensures that NASA received the best value available in the market.
Public Impact
NASA personnel requiring specialized training will benefit from efficient and effective logistics support. The services delivered ensure the smooth execution of training programs, crucial for workforce development. The contract's impact is primarily within NASA's operational sphere, supporting its internal training initiatives. Workforce implications are indirect, focusing on enabling NASA's training programs rather than direct job creation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for contractor lock-in if performance is consistently good, making future re-competition challenging.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical logistics could pose a risk if the contractor faces financial or operational difficulties.
Positive Signals
- The firm-fixed-price contract type transfers cost overrun risk to the contractor.
- Award to RGI, Inc. suggests a proven ability to meet NASA's requirements.
- The high number of competing offers indicates a healthy market for these services.
Sector Analysis
The training logistics support services fall under the broader administrative and support services sector. This sector is characterized by a wide range of companies, from large corporations to specialized small businesses, offering services essential for government operations. The market size for government administrative support is substantial, with agencies consistently requiring such services to manage their workforce and programs effectively. This contract represents a typical procurement within this segment, focused on ensuring efficient delivery of non-core but critical support functions.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses and was awarded under full and open competition. There is no explicit indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses within the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal, though RGI, Inc. may engage small businesses as subcontractors at its discretion.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within NASA responsible for training. Performance monitoring, adherence to contract terms, and quality assurance are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Training Programs
- Federal Administrative Services
- Logistics Support Contracts
- Government Training Services
Risk Flags
- Contract Duration
- Firm Fixed Price Risk
- Contractor Performance Dependency
Tags
nasa, training-logistics, administrative-services, rgi-incorporated, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, virginia, office-administrative-services, federal-contract, procurement
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $9.9 million to RGI, INCORPORATED. TRAINING LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RGI, INCORPORATED.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $9.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-09-15. End: 2009-03-31.
What is the contractor's performance history with NASA on similar contracts?
RGI, Inc. has a history of performing training logistics support services for NASA, as indicated by this contract's award. While specific performance metrics are not detailed in the provided data, the fact that they were awarded this contract, especially under full and open competition with 51 offers, suggests a satisfactory track record. Further analysis would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, any contract modifications, and the timeliness and quality of services rendered on previous NASA engagements to fully assess their reliability and capability in this domain.
How does the contract's value compare to similar training logistics contracts awarded by other federal agencies?
The contract value of approximately $9.9 million over its duration is moderate for federal training logistics support. Benchmarking against similar contracts requires access to a broader dataset of federal procurements. However, contracts for comprehensive training support, including logistics, can range from a few million to tens of millions of dollars depending on scope, duration, and agency needs. Given the 51 offers received, it suggests the pricing was competitive within the market for NASA's specific requirements. A detailed comparison would involve analyzing contracts with similar North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (e.g., 561110 - Office Administrative Services, or related codes for training services) across different agencies.
What are the primary risks associated with this training logistics support contract?
Key risks include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor (RGI, Inc.), leading to disruptions in NASA's training schedules. Given the firm-fixed-price nature, there's a risk of the contractor cutting corners to maintain profitability, impacting service quality. Another risk is the potential for key personnel turnover within RGI, Inc., affecting institutional knowledge. Dependence on a single contractor for critical logistics also poses a risk if the company experiences financial instability or operational failures. Finally, changes in NASA's training requirements could lead to contract modifications or disputes if not managed effectively.
How effective has RGI, Inc. been in delivering training logistics support based on historical data?
The provided data does not include specific metrics on RGI, Inc.'s historical effectiveness. However, the award of this contract, particularly under full and open competition with numerous bids, implies that their past performance was deemed adequate or superior by NASA evaluators. To assess effectiveness thoroughly, one would need to examine NASA's past performance reports for RGI, Inc. on this or related contracts, looking at metrics such as on-time delivery, quality of services, responsiveness to issues, and overall client satisfaction. Without these specific reports, effectiveness remains an assumption based on the contract award itself.
What has been the historical spending trend for training logistics support services at NASA?
The provided data focuses on a single contract awarded in 2003. To understand historical spending trends for training logistics support at NASA, a broader analysis of procurement data over several fiscal years would be necessary. This would involve identifying all contracts related to training logistics (using relevant NAICS codes and contract descriptions) awarded by NASA and aggregating their values. Such an analysis could reveal whether spending in this category has increased, decreased, or remained stable, and identify major contractors or shifts in procurement strategies over time.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Office Administrative Services › Office Administrative Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 51
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: 5111 LEESBURG PIKE STE 201, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Woman Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $9,959,000
Exercised Options: $9,959,000
Current Obligation: $9,930,589
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-09-15
Current End Date: 2009-03-31
Potential End Date: 2009-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-09-20
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →