DoD's Missile Defense Agency awards $7.8M contract for JFCC-IMD systems maintenance to Amentum Technology
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $7,880,568 ($7.9M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-03-01
End Date: 2027-02-08
Contract Duration: 1,440 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: MAINTAIN AND SUSTAIN THE JOINT FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT COMMAND INTEGRATED MISSILE DEFENSE (JFCC-IMD) MISSION/ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS, CAPABILITIES, AND FACILITIES.
Place of Performance
Location: COLORADO SPRINGS, EL PASO County, COLORADO, 80912
State: Colorado Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $7.9 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: MAINTAIN AND SUSTAIN THE JOINT FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT COMMAND INTEGRATED MISSILE DEFENSE (JFCC-IMD) MISSION/ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS, CAPABILITIES, AND FACILITIES. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on maintaining critical integrated missile defense systems, highlighting the importance of operational readiness. 2. Amentum Technology, Inc. secured this contract, indicating their role in supporting specialized defense infrastructure. 3. The contract duration of 1440 days suggests a long-term commitment to system sustainment. 4. Awarded under full and open competition, this contract implies a competitive bidding process. 5. The 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences' NAICS code suggests a focus on advanced technical support. 6. The contract type (Cost Plus Incentive Fee) aims to incentivize cost control and performance. 7. This award represents a portion of broader Department of Defense spending on missile defense capabilities.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $7.8 million over approximately four years for maintaining complex missile defense systems appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar sustainment contracts for specialized defense IT and engineering services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure suggests an effort to manage costs effectively, but the final expenditure will depend on performance and cost efficiencies achieved by the contractor.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service quality. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the open competition suggests a healthy level of interest from qualified contractors in supporting the Missile Defense Agency's needs.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best value for the services required to maintain critical missile defense systems.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the Joint Functional Component Command Integrated Missile Defense (JFCC-IMD), ensuring the operational readiness of their mission-critical systems. Services delivered include the maintenance and sustainment of complex IT systems, capabilities, and facilities essential for missile defense operations. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around facilities managed by the JFCC-IMD, potentially in Colorado where the contractor has a presence. Workforce implications include the need for skilled technical personnel to support advanced defense systems, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in specialized engineering and IT fields.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Incentive Fee contracts if not closely monitored.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical system maintenance could pose a risk if performance falters.
- The complexity of integrated missile defense systems may present challenges in ensuring comprehensive and effective maintenance.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
- The long contract duration indicates a stable and predictable need for these services.
- The Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure incentivizes contractor performance and cost efficiency.
- Amentum Technology's role in sustaining defense systems points to established expertise in the field.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on the maintenance and sustainment of advanced technological systems for missile defense. The market for defense IT and systems integration is highly specialized, with significant government spending allocated to maintaining and upgrading complex defense infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve contracts for similar IT sustainment, cybersecurity, and engineering support for critical national security systems.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., is likely a large business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within this specific award. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether Amentum Technology engages small businesses for specialized support services, which is not detailed here.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Missile Defense Agency, with potential involvement from the Department of Defense's Inspector General. Accountability measures are embedded within the Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure, which links contractor profit to performance and cost targets. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance metrics and detailed cost breakdowns may not be publicly disclosed.
Related Government Programs
- Missile Defense Systems Sustainment
- Department of Defense IT Infrastructure
- Joint Functional Component Command Programs
- Advanced Technology Maintenance Contracts
- Federal Research and Development Spending
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost creep in CPIF contracts.
- Dependence on contractor performance for critical systems.
- Complexity of integrated missile defense systems.
Tags
department-of-defense, missile-defense-agency, amentum-technology-inc, research-and-development, it-services, systems-maintenance, cost-plus-incentive-fee, full-and-open-competition, colorado, defense-contracting, national-security
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $7.9 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. MAINTAIN AND SUSTAIN THE JOINT FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT COMMAND INTEGRATED MISSILE DEFENSE (JFCC-IMD) MISSION/ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS, CAPABILITIES, AND FACILITIES.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Missile Defense Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $7.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-03-01. End: 2027-02-08.
What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense, particularly in missile defense systems?
Amentum Technology, Inc. has a significant history of supporting Department of Defense contracts, including those related to complex systems engineering, IT infrastructure, and operational support. While specific details on their involvement with missile defense systems prior to this award are not provided in the summary data, their selection suggests prior experience or demonstrated capability in related areas. A deeper analysis would involve reviewing their contract history with the Missile Defense Agency and other defense entities to assess performance, past issues, and overall reliability in delivering critical services. Their broader portfolio often includes maintenance, sustainment, and modernization of large-scale government systems.
How does the $7.8 million contract value compare to similar missile defense IT sustainment contracts?
The $7.8 million contract value for approximately four years of maintenance and sustainment for JFCC-IMD mission/administrative systems is a moderate figure within the broader context of defense IT spending. To benchmark effectively, one would compare it against contracts for similar services (e.g., IT system sustainment, network operations, cybersecurity) awarded by the Missile Defense Agency or other branches of the DoD for comparable systems. Factors like system complexity, scope of services (maintenance, upgrades, support), and contract duration heavily influence pricing. Without specific comparable contract data, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent or fair value, but it appears to be within a plausible range for specialized defense IT support.
What are the primary risks associated with this Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract?
The primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract revolve around cost control and performance management. For the government, there's a risk that costs could exceed initial estimates if the contractor is not effectively incentivized or if unforeseen technical challenges arise, even with the incentive structure. The contractor bears risk related to achieving target costs and performance metrics to maximize their profit. A key risk for the government is ensuring that the incentive targets are appropriately set to drive desired outcomes without being overly generous or unattainable. Effective oversight is crucial to monitor costs, validate performance, and ensure the incentive structure is functioning as intended to achieve value for taxpayer money.
How effective is the 'full and open competition' process likely to be in ensuring value for this specific contract?
The 'full and open competition' process is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value in government contracting, as it allows a wide range of qualified vendors to compete. This broad competition typically drives down prices and encourages innovation as contractors strive to offer the best solution at the most competitive rate. For this contract, the effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the requirements, the realism of the evaluation criteria, and the number and capability of the bidding firms. If the competition was robust with multiple capable bidders, it significantly increases the likelihood that the Missile Defense Agency secured a fair price and a high-quality service for maintaining critical missile defense systems.
What are the historical spending patterns for JFCC-IMD mission/administrative systems maintenance?
The provided data only details a single award of $7.8 million for the period of March 1, 2023, to February 8, 2027. To understand historical spending patterns for JFCC-IMD mission/administrative systems maintenance, one would need to examine contract awards over several preceding years. This would involve searching databases like FPDS or USASpending for contracts awarded to various entities for similar services related to JFCC-IMD systems. Analyzing this historical data would reveal trends in spending levels, identify key contractors, understand the typical contract types and durations, and assess whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, providing context for the current award's significance.
What is the significance of the NAICS code 541712 (Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences) for this contract?
The NAICS code 541712 indicates that the primary focus of this contract is on research and development activities within physical, engineering, and life sciences, excluding biotechnology. For a contract focused on 'maintain and sustain' systems, this classification suggests that the work involves more than just routine IT support. It likely encompasses advanced technical analysis, problem-solving for complex engineering issues, potential minor system enhancements or modifications driven by operational needs, and ensuring the systems remain at the cutting edge of missile defense technology. This implies a need for highly skilled personnel with specialized scientific and engineering expertise, rather than just standard IT helpdesk functions.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - NETWORK
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: H9500115R0001
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC
Address: 550 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD, TULLAHOMA, TN, 37388
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,693,827
Exercised Options: $11,693,827
Current Obligation: $7,880,568
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 1
Total Subaward Amount: $39,109
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: HQ079617D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-03-01
Current End Date: 2027-02-08
Potential End Date: 2027-02-08 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-25
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)