DoD's $5.6M Irregular Warfare Center Support Contract Awarded to Morgan 6, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,644,528 ($5.6M)

Contractor: Morgan 6, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-09-01

End Date: 2026-08-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: THE DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY (DSCA) HAS A NEED FOR NON-PERSONAL SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE IRREGULAR WARFARE CENTER (IWC). PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT AND OTHER ASSOCIATED ATTACHMENTS FOR FURTHER DETAIL.

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $5.6 million to MORGAN 6, LLC for work described as: THE DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY (DSCA) HAS A NEED FOR NON-PERSONAL SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE IRREGULAR WARFARE CENTER (IWC). PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT AND OTHER ASSOCIATED ATTACHMENTS FOR FURTHER DETAIL. Key points: 1. Contract aims to provide non-personal services for the Irregular Warfare Center. 2. Awarded via full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process. 3. The contract has a firm-fixed-price structure, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. Duration of 364 days suggests a focused, project-based need rather than long-term sustainment. 5. The professional, scientific, and technical services NAICS code points to specialized expertise. 6. Virginia location may indicate proximity to key DoD facilities or personnel.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $5.64 million for a 364-day period appears reasonable for specialized support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for non-personal services in defense requires access to detailed performance work statements and pricing data. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests the government has negotiated a set price, which can be advantageous if the contractor can deliver efficiently. Without specific performance metrics or comparable contract data, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This specific procurement method implies that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were excluded for reasons not detailed in the provided data. The number of bidders (10) is a positive indicator of competition, suggesting multiple entities were interested and capable of performing the work. This level of competition should theoretically lead to competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The exclusion of sources, even if justified, warrants scrutiny to ensure it did not unduly limit competition and potentially increase costs for taxpayers. However, with 10 bidders, the competition level appears sufficient to drive a fair market price.

Public Impact

The Irregular Warfare Center (IWC) is the primary beneficiary, receiving essential support services. Services delivered are non-personal, focusing on expertise and technical assistance rather than labor. The contract is geographically focused within Virginia, likely supporting operations or personnel in that region. Workforce implications are indirect, as the contract is for non-personal services, meaning the contractor provides the expertise, not direct government personnel augmentation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'exclusion of sources' clause requires further investigation to understand the rationale and ensure fairness.
Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the contractor's efficiency and effectiveness.
The specific nature of 'irregular warfare' support can be sensitive and may involve classified or specialized knowledge.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process with 10 bidders, indicating market interest and capability.
Firm-fixed-price contract structure aligns cost and performance incentives for the contractor.
The contract duration is clearly defined, providing a predictable period for service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically NAICS code 541990. This broad category encompasses a wide range of specialized services, including research, consulting, and technical support. The defense sector often procures such services to augment internal capabilities, particularly in niche areas like irregular warfare. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific nature of the 'non-personal services' required by the IWC, which could range from strategic analysis to specialized training development.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications mandated by small business set-asides. The impact on the small business ecosystem is neutral in terms of direct set-aside benefits, though larger prime contractors may still engage small businesses for specialized support.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the Department of Defense's contracting and program management offices, specifically within the Washington Headquarters Services (WHS) and the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA). Accountability is driven by the firm-fixed-price contract terms and the performance work statement. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award notice, though detailed performance data may be less accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Irregular Warfare Support Programs
Specialized Defense Consulting Services
Professional and Technical Services Contracts
Department of Defense Non-Personal Services

Risk Flags

Exclusion of Sources
Potential for Undefined Scope
Reliance on Specialized Expertise

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $5.6 million to MORGAN 6, LLC. THE DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY (DSCA) HAS A NEED FOR NON-PERSONAL SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE IRREGULAR WARFARE CENTER (IWC). PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT AND OTHER ASSOCIATED ATTACHMENTS FOR FURTHER DETAIL.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MORGAN 6, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Washington Headquarters Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-01. End: 2026-08-31.

What is the specific nature of the 'non-personal services' required by the Irregular Warfare Center?

The provided data does not detail the specific 'non-personal services.' However, based on the Irregular Warfare Center's mission, these services likely involve providing expertise, analysis, strategic planning, or specialized training support related to unconventional warfare tactics, counter-insurgency, and other non-traditional military operations. The Performance Work Statement (PWS), referenced but not provided, would contain the granular details of tasks, deliverables, and performance standards. These services are distinct from personal services, meaning the contractor's personnel will not be directly supervised or integrated into government staff in a manner that creates an employer-employee relationship.

How does the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' procurement method impact cost and fairness?

This procurement method indicates that the agency initially intended to compete the contract broadly but subsequently excluded certain sources. The reasons for exclusion are critical and could range from specific capability requirements, past performance issues, or national security concerns. While 10 bidders participated, suggesting a competitive landscape, the exclusion of any potential bidders could theoretically limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs than a truly unrestricted full and open competition. The fairness hinges on the justification for the exclusions being valid and documented according to federal acquisition regulations.

What is the typical cost range for similar non-personal services contracts supporting defense centers?

The cost range for similar non-personal services contracts can vary significantly based on the complexity of the services, the required expertise, the duration, and the specific agency. For a 364-day contract valued at approximately $5.64 million, this breaks down to roughly $15,500 per day. This daily rate suggests a need for highly specialized skills or a significant volume of analytical or advisory work. Benchmarking requires comparing the specific tasks outlined in the PWS against contracts for strategic analysis, intelligence support, or specialized program management within defense organizations.

What are the potential risks associated with supporting 'irregular warfare' operations?

Supporting irregular warfare operations carries inherent risks due to the complex and often ambiguous nature of the operating environments. These can include geopolitical instability, evolving threat landscapes, the need for cultural and linguistic expertise, and the potential for mission creep. From a contracting perspective, risks include the difficulty in defining clear requirements and metrics for success, the potential for rapid changes in mission objectives, and the need for contractors to maintain high levels of security clearance and operational security. The contractor's ability to adapt to dynamic situations and provide relevant, timely support is crucial.

What is the track record of Morgan 6, LLC in providing similar defense support services?

Information regarding the specific track record of Morgan 6, LLC in providing similar defense support services is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing the contractor's past performance evaluations, previous contract awards, and any publicly available information on their capabilities and experience. The fact that they were awarded this contract suggests they met the minimum requirements and demonstrated capability during the competitive process. Further due diligence would involve examining their performance on prior government contracts, especially those involving specialized technical or professional services for defense agencies.

How does the firm-fixed-price contract type influence contractor performance and government oversight?

A firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type places the primary responsibility for cost control and performance efficiency on the contractor. The government agrees to pay a set price regardless of the contractor's actual costs, provided the contractor meets the contract's requirements. This incentivizes the contractor to manage resources effectively and deliver the specified services within budget. For the government, it simplifies financial management and provides cost certainty. However, it necessitates robust initial negotiation and clear definition of requirements in the PWS to prevent scope creep or disputes. Oversight focuses on verifying that the contractor is meeting the defined performance standards and delivering the contracted scope of work.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: HQ003425RE062

Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 997 MORRISON DR, CHARLESTON, SC, 29403

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,903,808

Exercised Options: $9,017,726

Current Obligation: $5,644,528

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline