DoD's $14.8M contract for analyst support services awarded to Kenney Business Solutions Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,862,539 ($14.9M)

Contractor: Kenney Business Solutions Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-05-15

End Date: 2025-09-03

Contract Duration: 1,207 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: ANALYST (OGC) SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ALEXANDRIA, ALEXANDRIA CITY County, VIRGINIA, 22311

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.9 million to KENNEY BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC for work described as: ANALYST (OGC) SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the scope of analyst support services required. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with performance context suggesting a need for ongoing oversight. 4. The contract is positioned within the administrative and support services sector for the Department of Defense. 5. The duration of the contract indicates a long-term need for these specialized services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's value of approximately $14.8 million over its period of performance appears reasonable for specialized analyst support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for OGC support services is challenging without more granular data on specific tasks and deliverables. However, the pricing structure, likely based on labor hours, necessitates careful monitoring to ensure efficiency and prevent cost overruns. The award amount suggests a significant investment in analytical capabilities for the Department of Defense.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of three bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. This competitive process is expected to drive more favorable pricing and service quality for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process that aims to secure the best value for the services rendered, potentially leading to cost savings compared to a sole-source or limited competition award.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense's Office of General Counsel (OGC), which receives essential analytical support. Services delivered include document preparation and analytical support crucial for legal and policy functions. The geographic impact is primarily within Washington D.C. and Virginia, where the agency operates. Workforce implications include the potential for skilled analysts to be engaged through the contractor, supporting government operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if task orders are not clearly defined.
Reliance on contractor personnel may pose knowledge transfer challenges.
Ensuring consistent quality across all analytical tasks requires robust oversight.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive market.
Contract duration suggests a stable, long-term need for these services.
The contractor, Kenney Business Solutions Inc., is likely experienced in providing such support.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically supporting administrative and legal functions within the federal government. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized analytical and document preparation capabilities. Comparable spending benchmarks for OGC support services can vary widely based on the complexity and duration of the required analysis.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the most capable vendor through open competition, rather than prioritizing small business participation. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are indirectly involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program or technical point of contact within the Department of Defense. Accountability measures would be tied to performance metrics and deliverables outlined in the contract. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed task-level performance data may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Administrative Support Contracts
Legal Services Support Contracts
Analyst Support Services
Document Preparation Services

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues if contractor personnel lack necessary expertise.
Risk of cost overruns if labor hours are not managed effectively.
Need for clear definition of analytical tasks to avoid scope creep.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.9 million to KENNEY BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC. ANALYST (OGC) SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KENNEY BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Washington Headquarters Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-05-15. End: 2025-09-03.

What is the track record of Kenney Business Solutions Inc. in providing similar analyst support services to the federal government?

Assessing Kenney Business Solutions Inc.'s track record requires a review of their past performance on federal contracts. This would involve examining contract databases for previous awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any reported issues or successes. A strong history of delivering high-quality analytical and document preparation services on time and within budget would indicate a lower performance risk for this current contract. Conversely, a history of performance issues, disputes, or contract terminations would raise concerns about their capability to meet the Department of Defense's requirements effectively.

How does the awarded amount of $14.8 million compare to similar analyst support contracts within the Department of Defense or other federal agencies?

Direct comparison of the $14.8 million award requires detailed knowledge of the specific services, labor categories, duration, and geographic locations of comparable contracts. However, for specialized analyst support and document preparation services, this figure suggests a substantial, multi-year engagement. Agencies often procure such services to augment internal capabilities for complex policy analysis, legal reviews, or program management. Benchmarking would ideally involve looking at contracts with similar North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (e.g., 561410 for Document Preparation Services, or related professional, scientific, and technical services codes) and similar contract types (labor hours). Without more granular data, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents high or low value, but it signifies a significant investment.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are likely in place?

Primary risks for this contract include potential scope creep, where the requirements expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost overruns. Another risk is contractor performance variability, where the quality or timeliness of analytical support may fluctuate. Dependence on key contractor personnel could also pose a risk if those individuals leave. Mitigation strategies likely include robust contract management, clearly defined task orders and deliverables, regular performance reviews, and potentially requiring the contractor to maintain a pool of qualified personnel. The use of labor hours also necessitates careful monitoring of hours expended against progress to ensure efficiency.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach in ensuring optimal value for taxpayer dollars in this specific contract?

The 'full and open competition' approach is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring optimal value for taxpayer dollars, as it allows the widest possible pool of qualified vendors to compete. This competition drives down prices and encourages innovation. For this $14.8 million contract, having three bidders suggests that the market was sufficiently robust to support competition. The effectiveness is further realized if the evaluation criteria were well-defined and focused on both technical capability and price. However, the true measure of value also depends on the quality of the services delivered and whether they meet the Department of Defense's needs efficiently over the contract's duration.

What is the historical spending pattern for analyst support services within the Department of Defense's Washington Headquarters Services (WHS)?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for analyst support services within WHS requires access to detailed federal procurement data over several fiscal years. This would involve identifying contracts awarded by WHS for similar services (e.g., under NAICS code 561410 or related professional services codes) and aggregating the spending. Understanding these patterns can reveal trends in contract volume, average award values, dominant contractors, and the evolution of service requirements. It can also highlight whether spending on such services has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, providing context for the current $14.8 million award and informing future budget projections and procurement strategies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Business Support Services › Document Preparation Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: HQ003422R0011

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7217 LOCKPORT PL, LORTON, VA, 22079

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,647,223

Exercised Options: $14,862,539

Current Obligation: $14,862,539

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSMA18D08QG

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline